Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7bb4899584-j8xrj Total loading time: 0.466 Render date: 2023-01-26T21:54:04.606Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

Developing a polar bear co-management strategy in Ontario through the indigenous stewardship model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

Matthew Kakekaspan
Affiliation:
Fort Severn Cree Nation, Fort Severn, ON P0V 1W0, Canada
Brian Walmark
Affiliation:
Keewaytinook Okimakanak Research Institute (KORI), 216 South Algoma Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 3C2, Canada
Raynald Harvey Lemelin
Affiliation:
Centre for Northern Studies, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 5E1, Canada (harvey.lemelin@lakeheadu.ca)
Martha Dowsley
Affiliation:
Centre for Northern Studies, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 5E1, Canada (harvey.lemelin@lakeheadu.ca)
Dawne Mowbray
Affiliation:
Centre for Northern Studies, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 5E1, Canada (harvey.lemelin@lakeheadu.ca)

Abstract

On 27 January 2011, the Fort Severn Cree nation presented its perspectives on the management of wabusk (Cree term for polar bear meaning the great wandering one) or polar bear (Ursus maritimus) to the international community. The following article provides an overview of the events that have transpired since the Conférence internationale mondes polaires held in Paris, France, on 26–28 January 2011. It begins by discussing the current state of the southern Hudson Bay polar bear sub-population and describing Cree interactions with polar bears before highlighting how the Fort Severn Cree nation is developing a co-management strategy through the indigenous stewardship model for polar bear management in its traditional territory in northern Ontario, Canada.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkes, F. 2008. Sacred ecology. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bird, L. 2007. The spirit lives in the mind: Omushkego stories, lives, and dreams. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, P. 2000. Indian country, God's country: native Americans and the national parks. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Carlsson, L., and Berkes, F.. 2005. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 6576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castro, A.P., and Nielsen, E.. 2001. Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environmental Science and Policy 4: 229239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, M. 2005. Addressing aboriginal land and treaty rights in Ontario: an analysis of past policies and options for the future. Prepared for the Ipperwash Inquiry. http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/english/collections/e-records/ipperwash/policy_part/meetings/pdf/Land_and_treaty_rights_Apr_29.pdf (accessed 12 February 2012).Google Scholar
De Lacey, T., and Lawson, B.. 1997. The Uluru/Kakadu model: joint management of indigenous -owned national parks in Australia. In: Stevens, S. (editor). Conservation through cultural survival: indigenous peoples and protected areas. Washington, D.C.: Island Press: 155187.Google Scholar
Dowsley, M., Lemelin, R.H. and the Fort Severn first nation. In press. Scenario planning in a polar bear-swampy Cree social-ecological system. Society and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Fidler, A., Lemelin, R.H., Peerla, D. and Walmark, B.. 2008. Hearing the voices of all parties. WWF Arctic Bulletin 1 (8): 1516.Google Scholar
Honderich, J.E. 1991. Wildlife as a hazardous resource: an analysis of the historical interaction of humans and polar bears in the Canadian arctic. Unpublished MA dissertation. Waterloo, Ontario: University of Waterloo, Geography Department.Google Scholar
Kakekaspan, M., Miles, T., Lemelin, H., Dowsley, M., Beaulieu, M., Taylor, M., Siebel, F. and Walmark, B.. 2010. Giving voice to bear: Cree observations and documentation of wabusk in Ontario: research report. Centre for Northern Studies and Keewaytinook Okimakanak Research Institute. Thunder Bay, Ontario.Google Scholar
Lemelin, R.H. 2010. Understanding mukadae makwa (black bear): black bear–human interactions in northwestern Ontario. In: Dunk, T. (editor). Transitions in marginal zones in the age of globalization: case studies from the north and south. Thunder Bay, ON: Centre for Northern Studies Press: 249281.Google Scholar
Lemelin, R.H., and Bennett, N.. 2010. The proposed Pimachiowin-Aki world heritage site in northern Canada: a collaborative initiative. Leisure/Loisir 34 (2): 169187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemelin, R.H., Dowsley, M., Walmark, B., Siebel, F., Bird, L., Hunter, G., Myles, T., Mack, M., Gull, M., Kakekaspan, M., the Washaho Cree Nation at Fort Severn and the Weenusk Cree Nation at Peawanuck. 2010. Wabusk of the Omushkegouk: Cree–polar bears (Ursus maritimus) interactions in northern Ontario. Human Ecology 38 (6): 803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemelin, R.H., Peerla, D. and Walmark, B.. 2008. Voices from the margins: the Muskekowuck Athinuwick/Cree people of northern Ontario and the management of wapusk/polar bear. Arctic 61 (1): 101103.Google Scholar
Long, J.S. 1995. Who got what at Winisk? Beaver 75: 2331.Google Scholar
Long, J.S. 2010. Treaty no. 9: making the agreement to share the land in far northern Ontario in 1905. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D.D.P., Graham, D., Whitelaw, G.S., Anderson, S., Cowan, D., McGarry, F., Robins, A., Gardner, H.L., Barbeau, C.D., Charania, N.A., General, Z., Liedtke, J., Sutherland, C., Alencar, P., Leonard, J.S. and Tsuji, L.J.S.. 2012. Collaborative geomatics and the Mushkegowuk Cree first nations: fostering adaptive capacity for community-based sub-arctic natural resource management. Geoforum 43: 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, D. 2009. Linking traditional knowledge and environmental practice in Ontario. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'Études Canadiennes 43 (3): 69100.Google ScholarPubMed
Obbard, M.E. 2007. Ontario report to the 39th meeting of the Federal-Provincial Polar Bear Technical Committee, 6–9 February 2007, Edmonton, Canada. Ontario recovery strategy for polar bear in Ontario, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wildlife Research and Development Section, Peterborough, Canada. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
OMNR (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources). 2008. State of resources reporting: polar bears in Ontario. URL: http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@sorr/documents/document/263710.pdf (accessed 3 December 2011).Google Scholar
Ontario. 2007. Endangered Species Act, 2007, S.O. 2007, chapter 6. URL: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_07e06_e.htm (accessed 14 December 2011).Google Scholar
Peacock, E., Derocher, A.E., Lunn, N.J. and Obbard, M.E.. 2010. Polar bear ecology and management in Hudson Bay in the face of climate change. In: Ferguson, S.H., Loseto, L.L. and Mallory, M.L. (editors). A little less Arctic: top predators in the world's largest northern inland sea, Hudson Bay. New York: Springer: 93116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peloquin, C., and Berkes, F.. 2009. Local knowledge, subsistence harvests and social-ecological complexity in James Bay. Human Ecology 375: 533545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragen, T.J., Huntington, H.P. and Hovelsrud, G.K.. 2008. Conservation of Arctic marine mammals faced with climate change. Ecological Applications 18: S166S174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, A., Pickering Sherman, K., Snodgrass, J.G., Delcore, H.D. and Sherman, R.. 2011. Indigenous peoples and the collaborative stewardship of nature: knowledge binds and institutional conflicts. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Spielmann, R., and Unger, M.. 2000. Towards a model of co-management of provincial parks in Ontario. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 2: 455486.Google Scholar
Stirling, I., and Parkinson, C.L.. 2006. Possible effects of climate warming on selected populations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian arctic. Arctic 59: 261275.Google Scholar
Taiepa, T., Lyver, P., Horsley, P., Davis, J., Brag, M. and Moller, J.. 1997. Co-management of New Zealand's conservation estate by Maori and Pakeha: a review. Environmental Conservation 24: 236250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonge, M.B., and Pulfer, T.L.. 2011. Recovery strategy for polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario.Google Scholar
3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Developing a polar bear co-management strategy in Ontario through the indigenous stewardship model
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Developing a polar bear co-management strategy in Ontario through the indigenous stewardship model
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Developing a polar bear co-management strategy in Ontario through the indigenous stewardship model
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *