Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-r9chl Total loading time: 0.365 Render date: 2021-06-22T21:38:25.161Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Article contents

Communicating traditional environmental knowledge: addressing the diversity of knowledge, audiences and media types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Eleanor Bonny
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, 70 Dysart Rd., Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
Fikret Berkes
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, 70 Dysart Rd., Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada

Abstract

Although there are a number of distinct audiences (for example students, hunter and trapper organisations, and co-management agencies) for traditional environmental knowledge, little work has been done in analysing how indigenous knowledge can be best communicated to these different groups. Using examples mainly from northern Canada and Alaska, we explore the challenge of collecting and communicating different kinds of traditional environmental knowledge; the media types or communication modes that can be used; and the appropriateness of these kinds of media for communicating with different audiences. A range of communication options is available, including direct interaction with knowledge holders, use of print media, maps, DVD/video, audio, CD ROM, and websites. These options permit a mix-and-match to find the best fit between kinds of knowledge, the intended audience, and the media type used. This paper does not propose to replace traditional methods of communication with technology. Rather, we examine how technology can serve community and other needs. No single option emerges as a clear best choice for communicating indigenous knowledge. Nevertheless, various media types offer avenues through which northern people can meet their educational, cultural, and political needs, and build cross-cultural understanding.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Andre, A., and Fehr, A.. 2001. Gwich'in ethnobotany: plants used by the Gwich'in for food, medicine, shelter and tools. Tsiigehtchic, NT: Gwich'in Social and Cultural Institute and Aurora Research Institute.Google Scholar
Atleo, E.R. (Umeek). 2004. Tsawalk: a Nuu-chah-nulth worldview. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Auld, J., and Kershaw, R.. 2005. The Sahtu atlas: maps and stories from the Sahtu settlement area in Canada's Northwest Territories. Norman Wells, NWT: Sahtu Renewable Resource Board.Google Scholar
Battiste, M., and Youngblood Henderson (Sa'ke'j), J.. 2000. Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage. Saskatoon: Purich.Google Scholar
Bearskin, J., Lameboy, G., Matthew, R., Pepabano, J., Pisinaquan, A., Ratt, W., and Rupert, D.. 1989. Cree trappers speak (compiler and editor Berkes, F.). Chisasibi, Quebec: Cree Trappers Association's Committee of Chisasibi and the James Bay Cree Cultural Education Centre.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 2008. Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Kislalioglu, M, Folke, C., and Gadgil, M.. 1998. Exploring the basic ecological unit: ecosystem-like concepts in traditional societies. Ecosystems 1: 409415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F., Diduck, A., Fast, H., Huebert, R., and Manseau, M. (editors). 2005. Breaking ice: integrated ocean management in the Canadian north. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Bird, L. 2005. Telling our stories: Omushkego legends and histories from Hudson Bay. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Blondeau, M., Roy, C., Cuevrier, A., and Avatay Cultural Institute, . 2004. Atlas des plantes des villages du Nunavik. Sainte-Foy, Quebec: Editions MultiMondes.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, J. 1998. The social life of stories. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, J. 2001. Glaciers and climate change: perspectives from oral tradition. Arctic 54: 377393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFU (Ethnographic Film Unit). 2008. University of British Columbia: Department of Anthropology, Ethnographic Film Unit. URL: http://www.anthfilm.anth.ubc.ca (accessed 22 January 2008).Google Scholar
Eamer, J. 2006. Keep it simple and be relevant: the first ten years of the Arctic borderlands ecological knowledge co-op. In: Reid, W.V., Berkes, F., Wilbanks, T., and Capistrano, D. (editors). Bridging scales and knowledge systems. Washington DC: Island Press: 185206.Google Scholar
Emery, A.R. 1997. Guidelines for environmental assessment and traditional knowledge: a report from the Centre of Traditional Knowledge to the World Council of Indigenous People. Ottawa: Centre for Traditional Knowledge.Google Scholar
Feit, H.A. 1992. Waswanipi Cree management of land and wildlife: Cree ethnoecology revisted. In: Cox, B. (editor). Native people, native lands: Canadian, Indians, Inuit and Metis. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
Fienup-Riordan, A. 1994. Boundaries and passages: rule and ritual in Yup'ik Eskimo oral tradition. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
FJMC (Fisheries Joint Management Committee). 2008. URL: http://www.fjmc.ca (accessed: 22 January 2008).Google Scholar
Fox, S. 2003. When the weather is uggianaqtuq: Inuit observations of environmental change (CD-ROM). Boulder, Colorado: Cartography Lab, Geography, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Freeman, M.R. (editor). 1976. Inuit land use and occupancy project. Ottawa: Department of Indian and Northern Affairs.Google Scholar
Gwich'in Elders. 1997. Gwich'in words about the land. Inuvik: Gwich'in Renewable Resource Board.Google Scholar
Gwich'in Elders. 2001. More Gwich'in words about the land. Inuvik: Gwich'in Renewable Resource Board.Google Scholar
Hart, E., and Amos, B.. 2004. Learning about marine resources and their use through Inuvialuit oral history. Inuvik: Inuvialuit Cultural Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Hay, K., Aglukark, D., Igutsaq, D., Ikkidluak, J., and Mike, M.. 2000. Final report of the Inuit bowhead knowledge study. Iqaluit: Nunavut Wildlife Management Board.Google Scholar
IHTI (Inuit Heritage Trust Incorporated). 2002. Report on the Inuit heritage trust place names workshop: 14–15 February 2002. Iqaluit: Inuit Heritage Trust Incorporated.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IISD (International Institute of Sustainable Development). 2000. Sila alangotok: Inuit observations of climate change. Winnipeg: IISD (Video: 42 mins).Google Scholar
Keith, D. (editor). 2005. Inuit qaujimaningit nanurnut: Inuit knowledge of polar bears: a project of the Gjoa Haven HTO. Calgary: Gjoa Haven HTO and CCI Press.Google Scholar
Kendrick, A., Lyver, P. O'B., and Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation, . 2005. Denesoline (Chipewyan) knowledge of barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) movements. Arctic 58: 175191.Google Scholar
Kublu, A., Laugrand, F., and Oosten, J.. 1999. Introduction. In: Nakasuk, S., Paniaq, H., Ootoova, E., and Angmaalik, P.Interviewing Inuit elders 1: introduction. Iqaluit: Nunavut Arctic College: 112.Google Scholar
Legat, A. (editor). 1991. Report of the traditional knowledge working group. Yellowknife: Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Culture and Communications.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. 1949. A sand county almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Main-Johnson, L. 2000. ‘A place that's good.’ Gitksan landscape perception and ethnoecology. Human Ecology 28: 301325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manseau, M., Parlee, B., Bill, L., Kendrick, A., and Rainbow Bridge Communications (producers), . 2005. Watching, listening, learning, understanding changes in the environment: community-based monitoring in northern Canada. In: Berkes, F., Huebert, R., Fast, H., Manseau, M., and Diduck, A. (editors). Breaking ice: renewable resource and ocean management in the Canadian north. Calgary: University of Calgary Press (Backcover - DVD: 28 mins).Google Scholar
Marles, R., Clavelle, C., Monteleone, L., Tays, N., and Burns, D.. 2000. Aboriginal plant use in Canada's northwest boreal forest. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, M., Arragutainaq, L., and Novalinga, Z.. 1997. Voices from the Bay: traditional ecological knowledge of Inuit and Cree in the Hudson Bay bioregion. Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resources Committee and Environmental Committee of Municipality of Sanikiluaq.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. 2004. Traditional ecological knowledge and sustainable development: towards co-existence. In: Blaser, M., Feit, H.A., and McRae, G. (editors). In the way of development. Indigenous peoples, life projects and globalization. London and New York: Zed Books: 7291.Google Scholar
Menzies, C.R. (editor). 2006. Traditional ecological knowledge and natural resource management. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
M'Lot, M. 2002. Ka isinakwak askiy: using Cree knowledge to perceive and describe the landscape of the Wapusk National Park area. Masters thesis. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Natural Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Moore, P., and Hennessy, K.. 2006. New technologies and contested ideologies: the Tagish First Voices project. The American Indian Quarterly 30 (1 and 2); 119137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadasdy, P. 1999. The politics of TEK: power and the ‘integration’ of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36: 118.Google Scholar
Nakashima, D.J. 1991. The ecological knowledge of Belcher Island Inuit: a traditional basis for contemporary wildlife co-management. Ph.D. thesis. Montreal: McGill University, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
Nichols, T., Berkes, F., Jolly, D., Snow, N.B., and the Community of Sachs Harbour, . 2004. Climate change and sea ice: local observations from the Canadian western Arctic. Arctic 57: 6879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, M. 1992. Arctic homeland: kinship, community and development in northwest Greenland. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
NWMB (Nunavut Wildlife Management Board). 2004. Nunavut wildlife harvest study. Iqaluit: Nunavut Wildlife Management Board.Google Scholar
Oozeva, C., Noongwook, C., Alowa, G., and Krupnik, I.. 2004. Watching ice and weather our way. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution, Arctic Studies Center.Google Scholar
Parlee, B., Manseau, M., and Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation. 2005a. Using traditional knowledge to adapt to ecological change: Denesoline monitoring of caribou movements. Arctic 58: 2637.Google Scholar
Parlee, B., Berkes, F, and the Teetl'it Gwich'in Renewable Resources Council. 2005b. Health of the land, health of the people: a case study on Gwich'in berry harvesting from northern Canada. EcoHealth 2: 127137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, R.J. 2002. Cree narrative. Expressing the personal meanings of events. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press (second edition).Google Scholar
Riedlinger, D., and Berkes, F.. 2001. Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record 37: 315328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riewe, R. 1992. Nunavut atlas. Edmonton: Canadian Circumpolar Institute and the Tungavik Federation of Nunavut.Google Scholar
Scott, C. 2006. Spirit and practical knowledge in the person of the bear among Wemindji Cree hunters. Ethnos 71: 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuegraf, M. 2005. Breaking ice: renewable resource and ocean management in the Canadian north (plain language version). Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Natural Resources Institute. URL: http://umanitoba.ca/institutes/natural_resources/nri_cbrm_publications.htmlGoogle Scholar
Simpson, L. 2005. Traditional ecological knowledge among aboriginal peoples in Canada. In: Taylor, B.R. (editor). Encyclopedia of religion and nature. London and New York: Thoemmes Continuum: 16491651.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M.G. 2006. The possibility of difference: rethinking co-management. Human Organization 65: 167180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiga Net. 2008. Arctic borderlands ecological knowledge co-op. URL: http://www.taiga.net (accessed 22 January 2008).Google Scholar
Takano, T. 2005. Connections with the land: land-skills courses in Igloolik, Nunavut. Ethnography 6: 463486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, A. 1979. Bringing home animals: religious ideology and mode of production of the Mistassini Cree hunter. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Thorpe, N., Hakongak, N., Eyegetok, S., and the Kitikmeot Elders, . 2001. Thunder on the tundra: Inuit quajimajatuqangit of the Bathurst caribou. Vancouver: Generation Printing.Google Scholar
Ticasuk. 1987. Tales of Ticasuk: Eskimo legends and stories. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
Tobias, T. 2000. Chief Kerry's moose: a guidebook to land use and occupancy mapping, research design and data collection. Vancouver: Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs.Google Scholar
Turner, N.J. 2004. Plants of Haida Gwaii. Winlaw, BC: Sono Nis Press.Google Scholar
Turner, N.J. 2005. The earth's blanket: traditional teachings for sustainable living. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Usher, P.J. 2000. Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53: 183193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, G.W. 2004. From TEK to IQ: Inuit qaujimajatuqangit and Inuit cultural ecology. Arctic Anthropology 41: 238250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WFMC (Whitefeather Forest Management Corporation). 2008. Whitefeather forest initiative. Pikangikum, Ontario. URL: www.whitefeatherforest.com (accessed 22 January 2008).Google Scholar
20
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Communicating traditional environmental knowledge: addressing the diversity of knowledge, audiences and media types
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Communicating traditional environmental knowledge: addressing the diversity of knowledge, audiences and media types
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Communicating traditional environmental knowledge: addressing the diversity of knowledge, audiences and media types
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *