Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:18:54.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Theory of the Engaging Narrator: Earnest Interventions in Gaskell, Stowe, and Eliot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Robyn R. Warhol
Robyn R. Warhol*
Affiliation:
University of Vermont, Burlington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Narrative theorists generally assume that narratees in novels are distinct from actual readers, as narrators are from authors. In early novels by Stowe, Gaskell, and Eliot, however, “engaging narrators” encourage actual readers to identify with the “you” that appears in narrative interventions. These novelists explicitly hoped to stir actual readers' sympathy for real-world sufferers, possibly even to move readers to action. An engaging narrator, unlike a “distancing” one, calls the narratee “you” (not “the reader”); assumes that the narratee sympathizes with the story; claims that the characters are “real”; and consistently directs the actual reader to consider the parallels between the fiction and “real life.” Since these strategies seem to originate in certain nineteenth-century women's texts, narrative theory's omission of them may have implications for gender criticism.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 101 , Issue 5 , October 1986 , pp. 811 - 818
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ammons, Elizabeth, ed. Critical Essays on Harriet Beecher Stowe. Boston: Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. “Dante's Addresses to the Reader.” Gesammelte Aufsätze zur romanischen Philologie. Bern: Francke, 1967. 145–55.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983.10.7208/chicago/9780226065595.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. “The Preface to The Nigger of the ‘Narcissus.”‘ The Nigger of the “Narcissus.” Ed. Kimbrough, Robert. New York: Norton, 1979. 705–17.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Adam Bede. Ed. Paterson, John. Boston: Houghton, 1968.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Adam Bede. Ed. John Paterson. Scenes of Clerical Life. Ed. Lodge, David. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Suzanne. “The Face in the Mirror: Authorial Presence in the Multiple Vision of Third-Person Impressionist Narrative.” Criticism 21 (1979): 230–50.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling. Ed. Baker, Sheridan. New York: Norton, 1973.Google Scholar
Ford, Ford Madox. “Impressionism and Fiction.” Critical Writings of Ford Madox Ford. Ed. MacShane, Frank. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1964. 33–103.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. Mary Barton. Ed. Gill, Stephen. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Trans. Lewin, Jane E. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Nouveau discours du récit. Paris: Seuil, 1980.Google Scholar
Gibson, Walker. “Authors, Speakers, Readers, and Mock Readers.” Tompkins, Reader-Response Criticism 1–6.Google Scholar
Gmelin, Hermann. “Die Anrede an den Leser in Dantes Göttlicher Komödie.” Deutsches Dante-Jahrbuch 29–30 (1951): 130–40.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. J. “The Omniscient Author Convention.” The Art of George Eliot. London: Chatto, 1961. 64–89.Google Scholar
James, Henry. Partial Portraits. London: Macmillan, 1888.Google Scholar
Monod, Sylvère. “Charlotte Brontë and the Thirty ‘Readers’ of Jane Eyre.” Jane Eyre. By Charlotte Brontë. Ed. Richard J. Dunn. New York: Norton, 1971. 496–507.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. S.J. “The Writer's Audience Is Always a Fiction.” PMLA 90 (1975): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinney, Thomas, ed. The Essays of George Eliot. London: Routledge, 1963.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. Toward a Speech-Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald. “Introduction to the Study of the Narratee.” Trans. Francis Mariner. Tompkins, Reader-Response Criticism 7–25.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald. “The Narratee Revisited.” Second Colloquium on Twentieth-Century Literature in French. Ann Arbor, 20 Oct. 1984. Forthcoming in Readers and Authors. Spec. issue of Style 19.2 (1985).Google Scholar
Smith, Jane S. “The Reader as Part of the Fiction: Middlemarch.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 19 (1977): 188–203.Google Scholar
Spady, Carol Howe. “The Dynamics of Reader Response in Middlemarch.” Rackham Literary Studies 9 (1978): 64–75.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. “The Addresses to the Reader in the Commedia.” Romanische Literaturstudien. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1959. 574–95.Google Scholar
Stang, Richard. The Theory of the Novel in England, 1850–1870. New York: Columbia UP, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, Harriet Beecher. A Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin. Leipzig: Tauchnitz, 1853.Google Scholar
Stowe, Harriet Beecher. Uncle Tom's Cabin. Ed. Douglas, Ann. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1981.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan. “Of Readers and Narratees: The Experience of Pamela.” L'esprit créateur 21 (1981): 89–97.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan, and Crosman, Inge. Introduction. The Reader in the Text. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1980. 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Vanity Fair. Ed. Stewart, J. I. M. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane P. “An Introduction to Reader-Response Criticism.” Tompkins, Reader-Response Criticism ix–xxvi.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane P., ed. Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane P., “Sentimental Power: Uncle Tom's Cabin and the Politics of Literary History.” Glyph 8 (1981): 93–95.Google Scholar
Warhol, Robyn R. “Poetics and Persuasion: Uncle Tom's Cabin as a Realist Novel.” Essays in Literature. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. Daniel. “Readers in Texts.” PMLA 96 (1981): 848–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar