Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:43:11.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of stable genotypes and genotype by environment interaction for grain yield in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Massaoudou Hamidou*
Affiliation:
Departement des cultures pluviales, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), BP: 429 Niamey, Niger
Oumarou Souleymane
Affiliation:
Departement des cultures pluviales, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), BP: 429 Niamey, Niger
Malick N. Ba
Affiliation:
International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), BP 12404 Niamey, Niger
Eric Yirenkyi Danquah
Affiliation:
West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana Legon, Accra, PMB: 30, Ghana
Issoufou Kapran
Affiliation:
Departement des cultures pluviales, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), BP: 429 Niamey, Niger
Vernon Gracen
Affiliation:
West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana Legon, Accra, PMB: 30, Ghana
Kwadwo Ofori
Affiliation:
West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana Legon, Accra, PMB: 30, Ghana
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: hmassaoud@yahoo.fr

Abstract

Sorghum is a staple food crop in Niger and its production is constrained by sorghum midge and the use of low yielding, local sorghum varieties. To improve sorghum productivity, it is crucial to provide farmers with high yielding sorghum cultivars that are resistant to midge. We evaluated 282 genotypes in four environments of Niger Republic. Alpha (0.1) lattice with two replications was the experimental design. Genotype and genotype by environment (GGE) biplot analysis was used to study grain yield (GY) stability and G × E interactions. The results revealed that two distinct mega environments were present. Genotype L232 was the best genotype for GY in the first planting date at Konni and the first and second planting dates (PDs) at Maradi. Genotype L17 was the best for GY in the second PD at Konni. The second PD at Konni was the most discriminating environment while the first PD at Konni is suitable for selecting widely adapted genotypes for GY.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adugna, A (2007) Assessment of yield stability in sorghum. African Crop Science Journal 15: 167171.Google Scholar
Al-Naggar, AMM, Abd El-Salam, RM, Hovny, MRA and Walaa, YSY (2018) Genotype×environment interaction and stability of Sorghum bicolor lines for some agronomique and yield traits in Egypt. Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research 1: 114.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, S and Grando, S (2007) Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155: 349360.Google Scholar
De Figueiredo, UJ, Nunes, JAR, Parrella, RDC, Souza, ED, da Silva, AR, Emygdio, BM, Machado, JRA and Tardin, FD (2015) Adaptability and stability of genotypes of sweet sorghum by GGE biplot and Toler methods. Genetics and Molecular Research 14: 1121111221.Google Scholar
Diawara, B (2012) Effect of planting date on growth, development and yield of grain sorghum hybrids. M.Sc. Thesis, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Ezzat, EM, Ali, MA and Mahmoud, AM (2010) Agronomic performance, genotype×environment interactions and stability analysis of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Asian Journal of Crop Science 2: 250260.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2014) Statistical Yearbook. World Food and Agriculture. FAO Food Agric. Organziation UN Rome Italy. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx (Accessed 19 March 2015).Google Scholar
Hamidou, M (2016) Breeding sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) for high grain yield and resistance to sorghum midge (Stenodiplosis sorghicola Coquillett) in Niger. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ghana.Google Scholar
Maman, N, Mason, SC, Lyon, DJ and Dhungana, P (2004) Yield components of pearl millet and grain sorghum across environments in the Central Great Plains. Crop Science 44: 21382145.Google Scholar
Menezes, CB, Saldanha, DC, Santos, CV, Andrade, LC, Júlio, MM, Portugal, AF and Tardin, FD (2015) Evaluation of grain yield in sorghum hybrids under water stress. Genetics and Molecular Research 14: 1267512683.Google Scholar
Teodoro, PE, Almeida, FJ, Daher, RF, Menezes, CB, Cardoso, MJ, Godinho, VP and Tardin, FD (2016) Identification of sorghum hybrids with high phenotypic stability using GGE biplot methodology. Genetics and Molecular Research: GMR 15: 234239.Google Scholar
Yan, W, Hunt, LA, Sheng, Q and Szlavnics, Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40: 597605.Google Scholar