Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:00:07.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity of Sorghumhalepense (L.) Pers. in Iran as revealed by IRAP markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2015

Azimeh Karimi
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Isfahan, 81746-73441, Isfahan, Iran
Hojjatollah Saeidi*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Isfahan, 81746-73441, Isfahan, Iran
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ho.saeidi@sci.ui.ac.ir

Abstract

Sorghum halepense grows in a vast range of ecological regions of Iran. In this study, inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP) markers were used to assess the genetic diversity of 38 accessions of S. halepense and two accessions of Sorghum bicolor (used as out groups) collected from different regions of Iran. In total, 180 DNA fragments were amplified from eight combinations of IRAP primers, from which 178 (98.9%) were polymorphic. The IRAP-based trees and two-dimensional plot of principal coordinate analysis demonstrated six different groups corresponding to their geographical origin in Iranian germplasm of S. halepense: (1) in the south-west region; (2) in the west along the Zagros Mountains; (3) in the north-west of the country; (4) in the centre of the country; (5) and (6) in the northern region along the eastern and western coast of Caspian Sea. The most variable populations were found in the centre and the west of Iran. The results showed high gene flow among different regions, although the south-western accessions were well differentiated from those growing in other regions. The accessions collected from western coast of Caspian Sea were differentiated from neighbouring regions in both morphological characters and IRAP data. The measured genetic distances were independent of geographical distances. This survey demonstrates high genetic dynamism in Iranian germplasm of S. halepense and indicates that the present germplasm is of great value in terms of sampling for new alleles for crop improvement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhavan, A, Saeidi, H and Rahiminejad, MR (2010) Genetic diversity of Secale cereale L. in Iran as measured using microsatellites. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 415422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnaud, A, Deu, M, Garine, E, Mckey, D and Joly, HI (2007) Local genetic diversity of Sorghum in a village in northern Cameroon: structure and dynamics of landraces. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 237248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bor, NL (1960) The Grasses of Burma, Ceylon, India, and Pakistan. Oxford: Pergmon Press.Google Scholar
Bor, NL (1970) Gramineae. In: Rechinger, KH (ed.) Flora Iranica. Graz, Austria: Akademisch Druk- und Veragsanatalt, Wienaa 70, pp. 528530.Google Scholar
Boyko, E, Kalendar, R, Korzun, V, Gill, B and Schulman, AH (2002) Combined mapping of Aegilops tauschii by retrotransposon, microsatellite, and gene markers. Plant Molecular Biology 48: 767790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branco, CJS, Vieira, EA, Malone, G, Kopp, MM, Malone, E, Bernardes, A, Mistura, CC, Carvalho, FIF and Oliveira, CA (2007) IRAP and REMAP assessments of genetic similarity in rice. Journal of Applied Genetics 48: 107113.Google Scholar
Celarier, RP (1958) Cytotaxonomic notes on the subsection Halepensia of the genus Sorghum . Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 85: 4962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wet, JMJ and Huckabay, JP (1967) The origin of Sorghum bicolor. II. Distribution and domestication. Evolution 21: 787802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Wet, JMJ and Harlan, JR (1971) The origin and domestication of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Economic Botany 25: 128135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, SL, Lawrence, PK and Henry, RJ (2001) The use of ribosomal ITS to determine phylogenetic relationships within Sorghum . Plant Systematics and Evolution 230: 97110.Google Scholar
Dillon, SL, Lawrence, PK, Henry, RJ, Ross, L, Price, HJ and Johnston, JS (2004) Sorghum laxiflorum and S. macrospermum, the Australian native species most closely related to the cultivated S. bicolor based on ITS1 and ndhF sequence analysis of 25 Sorghum species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 249: 233246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doggett, H (1988) Sorghum. 2nd edn. London: Longman Scientific and Technics, p. 529.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT(2013) Plant genetic resources of forage crops, pasture and rangelands. http://faostat.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/../thematicstudy_forage.pdf (accessed accessed 2013).Google Scholar
Fernández, L, De Haro, LA, Distefano, AJ, Martínez, MC, Lía, V, Papa, JC, Olea, I, Tosto, D and Hopp, HE (2013) Population genetics structure of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance. Ecology and Evolution 3: 33883400.Google Scholar
Flavell, AJ, Smith, DB and Kumar, A (1992) Extreme heterogeneity of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons in plants. Molecular and General Genetics 231: 233242.Google Scholar
Gawel, NJ and Jarret, RL (1991) A modified CTAB extraction procedure for Musa and Ipomoea . Plant Molecular Biology Reports 9: 262266.Google Scholar
Harlan, JR and De Wet, JMJ (1972) A simplified classification of cultivated sorghum. Crop Science 12: 172176.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, JS, Brandes, A, Taketa, S, Schmidt, T, Vershinin, AV, Alkhimova, EG, Kamm, A, Doudrick, RL, Schwarzacher, T, Katsiotis, A, Kubis, S, Kumar, A, Pearce, SR, Flavell, AJ and Harrison, GE (1997) The chromosomal distributions of Ty1-copia group retrotransposable elements in higher plants and their implications for genome evolution. Genetica 100: 197204.Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Donald, P, Pancho, JV and Herberger, JP (1977) The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, Hawaii: The University Press of Hawaii, p. 609.Google Scholar
House, LR (1985) A Guide to Sorghum Breeding. 2nd edn: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics, India, p. 203.Google Scholar
Jaccard, P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44: 223270 (Cited and implemented in NTSYSpc program, version 2.02e).Google Scholar
Jenabi, T, Saeidi, H and Rahiminejad, MR (2011) Biodiversity of Secale strictum in Iran measured using microsatellites. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 58: 497505.Google Scholar
Kalendar, R, Grab, T, Regina, M, Suoniemi, A and Schulman, AH (1999) IRAP and REMAP: two new retrotransposon-based DNA fingerprinting techniques. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 704711.Google Scholar
Kalendar, R, Tanskanen, J, Immonen, S, Nevo, E and Schulman, AH (2000) Genome evolution of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) by BARE-1 retrotransposon dynamics in response to sharp microclimatic divergence. Proceedings of Natural Academy of Science USA 97: 66036607.Google Scholar
Khodayari, H, Saeidi, H, Akhavan, A, Pourkheirandish, M and Komatsuda, T (2014) Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum) using different sampling methods in Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 20: 4150.Google Scholar
Liu, K and Muse, SV (2005) PowerMarker: integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21: 21282129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, A, Harris, S and Ashton, P (2004) Ecological Genetics; Design, Analysis and Application. Blackwell Publishing, p. 326.Google Scholar
Manninen, O, Kalendar, R, Robinson, J and Schulman, AH (2000) Application of BAR/M retrotransposon markers to the mapping of a major resistance gene for net blotch in barley. Molecular and General Genetics 264: 325334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, A (2008) Utilization of genomic retrotransposons as cladistics markers. Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology 7: 1728.Google Scholar
Maxted, N, Kell, S and Ford-Lloyd, B (2008) Crop wild relative conservation and use: establishing the context. In: Maxted, N, Ford-Lloyd, B, Kell, S, Iriondo, JM, Dulloo, E and Turok, J (eds) Crop Wild Relative Conservation and Use. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 330.Google Scholar
Meredith, D (1955) The Grasses and Pastures of South Africa. Johannesburg: Cape Times, Parow University of South Africa.Google Scholar
Morden, CW, Doebley, J and Schertz, KE (1990) Allozyme variation among the spontaneous species of Sorghum section Sorghum (Poaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80: 296304.Google Scholar
Morrell, PL, Williams-Coplin, TD, Lattu, AL, Bowers, JE, Chandler, JM and Paterson, AH (2005) Crop-to-weed introgression has impacted allelic composition of Johnsongrass populations with and without recent exposure to cultivated sorghum. Molecular Ecology 14: 21432154.Google Scholar
Mousavifard, SS, Saeidi, H, Rahiminejad, MR and Shamsadini, M (2015) Molecular analysis of diversity of diploid Triticum species in Iran using ISSR markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution DOI: 10.1007/s10722-014-0160-z.Google Scholar
Naghavi, MR, Malaki, M, Alizadeh, H, Pirseiedi, M and Mardi, M (2009) An assessment of genetic diversity in wild diploid wheat Triticum boeoticum from west of Iran using RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology 11: 585598.Google Scholar
Nei, M and Li, WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 76: 52695273 (Cited and implemented in NTSYSpc program, version 2.02e).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, D (1993) The Nature Conservancy Element Stewardship Abstract for Sorghum Halepense . Available at http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/sorghal.html. Virginia: The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
Ng'uni, D (2011) Phylogenetics of the Genus Sorghum, Genetic Diversity and Nutritional Value of its Cultivated Species. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden, p. 59. (Doctoral Thesis).Google Scholar
Paterson, AH, Schertz, KF, Lin, YR, Liu, SC and Chang, YL (1995) The weediness of wild plants: molecular analysis of genes influencing dispersal and persistence of Johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 92: 61276131.Google Scholar
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (2000) NTSYSpc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System User Guide. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Saeidi, H, Rahiminejad, MR and Heslop-Harrison, JS (2008) Retroelement insertional polymorphisms, diversity and phylogeography within diploid, D-genome Aegilops tauschii (Triticeae, Poaceae) sub-taxa in Iran. Annals of Botany 101: 855861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharifi-Rigi, P, Saeidi, H and Rahiminejad, MR (2014) Genetic diversity and geographic distribution of variation of Hordeum murinum as revealed by retroelement insertional polymorphisms in Iran. Biologia 69: 469477.Google Scholar
Sherwin, WB, Jabot, F, Rush, R and Rossetto, M (2006) Measurement of biological information with applications from genes to landscapes. Molecular Ecology 15: 28572869.Google Scholar
Shimamura, M, Yasue, H, Ohshima, K, Abe, H, Kato, H, Kishiro, T, Goto, M, Munechika, I and Okada, N (1997) Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature 388: 666670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenhouse, JW, Prasada Rao, KE, Gopal Reddy, V and Appa Rao, S (1997) Sorghum . In: Fuccillo, D, Sears, L and Stapleton, P (eds) Biodiversity in Trust, Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources in CGIAR Centers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 292308.Google Scholar
Teo, CH, Tan, SH, Ho, CL, Faridah, QZ, Othman, YR, Heslop-Harrison, JS, Kalendar, R and Schulman, AH (2005) Genome constitution and classification using retrotransposon-based markers in the orphan crop banana. Journal of Plant Biology 48: 96105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI and Black, LD (1983) The biology of Canadian weeds. 61. Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63: 9971014.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Karimi and Saeidi supplementary material

Table S1

Download Karimi and Saeidi supplementary material(File)
File 16.4 KB