Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:03:40.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing genetic diversity of potato genotypes using inter-PBS retrotransposon marker system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2017

Ufuk Demirel Open the ORCID record for Ufuk Demirel [Opens in a new window] ,
İlknur Tındaş ,
Caner Yavuz ,
Faheem Shehzad Baloch  and
Mehmet Emin Çalışkan
Ufuk Demirel*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Genetic Engineering, Ömer Halisdemir University, 51240 Nigde, Turkey
İlknur Tındaş
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Genetic Engineering, Ömer Halisdemir University, 51240 Nigde, Turkey
Caner Yavuz
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Genetic Engineering, Ömer Halisdemir University, 51240 Nigde, Turkey
Faheem Shehzad Baloch
Affiliation:
Department of Field Crops, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey
Mehmet Emin Çalışkan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Genetic Engineering, Ömer Halisdemir University, 51240 Nigde, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ufukdemirel@ohu.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Having knowledge on genetic similarity and DNA profile of potato genotypes facilitates a breeder's decision for parent selection and provides accurate variety identification. Fingerprinting and identification of genetic similarity among 151 potato genotypes were achieved using an inter-primer-binding sites (iPBS) retrotransposon marker system. Our study is the first application of iPBS markers for fingerprinting and distinguishing large numbers of Solanum tuberosum genotypes. Initially, 16 potato genotypes were screened using 45 iPBS retrotransposon markers to identify polymorphisms. Seventeen of these primers were selected for fingerprinting the whole set of accessions due to strong, reproducible and polymorphic bands. The 17 iPBS primers produced 290 scorable bands of which 224 were polymorphic. The number of bands per primer ranged from 10 to 26 with an average of 17.1. The number of polymorphic bands per primer was between 6 and 21. The polymorphism percentage per primer ranged from 46.2 to 100.0% with an average of 77.2% per primer. The mean polymorphism information content (PIC) values of iPBS primers varied from 0.12 to 0.31 per primer. Genetic similarity based on Jaccard's coefficient of potato genotypes ranged from 0.61 to 0.93 with an average of 0.73. The data produced herein may be used for selection of appropriate parents and variety description in the future. The findings of the present study suggest that iPBS retrotransposons are powerful and easy DNA markers for fingerprinting the large samples of potato germplasm.

Keywords

genetic similarityiPBS primersmolecular characterizationpotatoTurkey
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 137 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkale, C, Yildirim, Z, Yildirim, MB, Kaya, C, Öztürk, G and Tanyolaç, B (2010) Assessing genetic diversity of some potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes grown in Turkey using the AFLP marker technique. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 15: 73–78.Google Scholar
Alhani, MC and Wilkinson, MJ (1998) Inter simple sequence repeat polymerase chain reaction for the detection of somaclonal variation. Plant Breeding 117: 573–575.Google Scholar
Andeden, EE, Baloch, FS, Derya, M, Kilian, B and Özkan, H (2013) iPBS-Retrotransposons-based genetic diversity and relationship among wild annual Cicer species. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 22: 453–466.Google Scholar
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana . Nature 408: 796–815.Google Scholar
Baloch, FS, Derya, M, Andeden, EE, Alsaleh, A, Cömertpay, G, Kilian, B and Özkan, H (2015a) Inter-primer binding site retrotransposon and inter-simple sequence repeat diversity among wild Lens species. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 58: 162–168.Google Scholar
Baloch, FS, Alsaleh, A, de Miera, LES, Hatipoğlu, R, Çiftçi, V, Karaköy, T, Yıldız, M and Özkan, H (2015b) DNA based iPBS-retrotransposon markers for investigating the population structure of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm from Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 61: 244–252.Google Scholar
Côté, MJ, Leduc, L and Reid, A (2013) Evaluation of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers established in Europe as a method for the identification of potato varieties grown in Canada. American Journal of Potato Research 90: 340–350.Google Scholar
Demeke, T, Kawchuk, LM and Lynch, DR (1993) Identification of potato cultivars and clonal variants by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. American Potato Journal 70: 561–569.Google Scholar
Doyle, JJ (1991) DNA protocols for plants. In: Hewitt, G, Johnson, AWB and Young, JPW (eds) Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 283–293.Google Scholar
Fang-Yong, C and Ji-Hong, L (2014) Germplasm genetic diversity of Myrica rubra in Zhejiang Province studied using inter-primer binding site and start codon-targeted polymorphism markers. Scientia Horticulturae 170: 169–175.Google Scholar
Gailīte, A, Ievinsh, G and Ruņģis, D (2011) Genetic diversity analysis of Latvian and Estonian Saussurea esthonica populations. Environmental and Experimental Biology 9: 115–119.Google Scholar
Ghislain, M, Spooner, DM, Rodríguez, F, Villamón, F, Núñez, J, Vásquez, C, Waugh, R and Bonierbale, M (2004) Selection of highly informative and user-friendly microsatellites (SSRs) for genotyping of cultivated potato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 881–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, DL, Guo, MX, Hou, XG and Zhang, GH (2014) Molecular diversity analysis of grape varieties based on iPBS markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 52: 27–32.Google Scholar
Hawkins, JS, Kim, H, Nason, JD, Wing, RA and Wendel, JF (2006) Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium . Genome Research 16: 1252–1261.Google Scholar
Hinze, LL, Fang, DD, Gore, MA, Scheffler, BE, Yu, JZ, Frelichowski, J and Percy, RG (2015) Molecular characterization of the Gossypium diversity reference set of the US National Cotton Germplasm Collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128: 313–327.Google Scholar
Jaccard, P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44: 233–270.Google Scholar
Kalendar, R and Schulman, AH (2006) IRAP and REMAP for retrotransposon-based genotyping and fingerprinting. Nature Protocols 1: 2478–2484.Google Scholar
Kalendar, R, Antonius, K, Smykal, P and Schulman, AH (2010) iPBS: a universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 1419–1430.Google Scholar
Kandemir, N, Yılmaz, G, Karan, YB and Borazan, D (2010a) Development of a simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker set to fingerprint local and modern potato varieties grown in central Anatolian Plateau in Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology 9: 5516–5522.Google Scholar
Kandemir, N, Yılmaz, G, Karan, YB and Borazan, D (2010b) Isolation of different genotypes in Başçiftlik Beyazi local potato variety using SSR markers. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 15: 84–88.Google Scholar
Kawchuk, LM, Lunch, DR, Thomas, J, Penner, B, Sillito, D and Kulcsar, F (1996) Characterization of Solanum tuberosum simple sequence repeats and application to potato cultivar identification. American Potato Journal 73: 325–335.Google Scholar
McGregor, CE, Lambert, CA, Greyling, MM, Louw, JH and Warnich, L (2000) A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and SSR) in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm. Euphytica 113: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbourne, D, Meyer, R, Bradshaw, JE, Baird, E, Bonar, N, Provan, J, Powell, W and Waugh, R (1997) Comparison of PCR-based marker system for the analysis of genetic relationships in cultivated potato. Molecular Breeding 3: 127–136.Google Scholar
Moisan-Thiery, M, Marhadour, S, Kerlan, MC, Dessenne, N, Perramant, M, Gokelaere, T and Le Hingrat, Y (2005) Potato cultivars identification using simple sequence repeats markers (SSR). Potato Research 48: 191–200.Google Scholar
Nováková, A, Šimáčková, K, Bárta, J and Čurn, V (2009) Potato variety identification by molecular markers based on retrotransposon analyses. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 45: 1–10.Google Scholar
Prevost, A and Wilkinson, MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivar. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 107–112.Google Scholar
Provan, J, Powell, W and Waugh, R (1996) Microsatellite analysis of relationships within cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 1078–1084.Google Scholar
Raddová, J, Ptáčková, H, Čechová, J and Ondrášek, I (2012) Genetic analysis of the genus Diospyros ssp. using RAPD and i-PBS methods. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 60: 205–216.Google Scholar
Reif, JC, Melchinger, AE and Frisch, M (2005) Genetical and mathematical properties of similarity and dissimilarity coefficients applied in plant breeding and seed bank management. Crop Science 45: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouppe van der Voort, JNAM, van Eck, HJ, Draaistra, J, van Zandvoort, PM, Jacobsen, E and Bakker, J (1998) An online catalogue of AFLP markers covering the potato genome. Molecular Breeding 4: 73–77.Google Scholar
Schulman, AH, Flavell, AJ and Ellis, THN (2004) The application of LTR retrotransposons as molecular markers in plants. Methods in Molecular Biology 260: 145–175.Google Scholar
Sosinski, B and Douches, DS (1996) Using polymerase chain reaction-based DNA amplification to finger print North American potato cultivars. HortScience 31: 130–133.Google Scholar
Suttle, JC (2007) Dormancy and Sprouting. In: Vreugdenhil, D, Bradshaw, J, Gebhardt, C, Govers, F, Mackerron, DKL, Taylor, MA and Ross, HA (eds) Potato Biology and Biotechnology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 287–309.Google Scholar
The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium (2011) Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 475: 189–195.Google Scholar
van Treuren, R, Magda, A, Hoekstra, R and van Hintum, TJL (2004) Genetic and economic aspects of marker-assisted reduction of redundancy from a wild potato germplasm collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 277–290.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Shi, X, Hao, B, Ge, S and Luo, J (2005) Duplication and DNA segmental loss in the rice genome: implications for diploidization. New Phytologist 165: 937–946.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Demirel supplementary material

Table S1

Download Demirel supplementary material(File)
File 30.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Demirel supplementary material

Demirel supplementary material 1

Download Demirel supplementary material(File)
File 143.2 KB