Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-h2mp8 Total loading time: 0.341 Render date: 2021-08-03T02:39:21.604Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Can wild lentil genotypes help improve water use and transpiration efficiency in cultivated lentil?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Linda Yuya Gorim
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Albert Vandenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Climate change forecasts point to increased frequency of droughts which may affect plant growth. For protein crops such as lentil, genetic improvement of both water use and drought tolerance is necessary. Wild lentil species are known to have evolved in drought prone areas and can be introgressed into cultivated lentil, making them candidates for the evaluation of high transpiration efficiency (TE) and drought tolerance. We assessed TE, water use and drought tolerance at the plant level for five wild lentil species and in cultivated lentil. Under fully watered and moderate drought conditions, wild lentil genotypes consumed significantly less water to fix similar or more dry matter compared with their cultivated counterparts. Under severe drought conditions, the wild lentil genotype L. ervoides IG 72815 had significantly higher TE compared with L. culinaris Eston. Lens ervoides L-01-827A, had significantly higher yield compared with all other species in the presence or absence of drought and showed significantly higher (α = 5%) TE under moderate drought. Drought susceptibility index was identified as a tool to identify drought-tolerant lentil genotypes grown under severe drought. The numerous small seeds of wild lentil made it difficult to estimate drought indices that are weight based and require formulae that incorporate seed numbers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blum, A (2009) Review: effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Research 112: 119123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, RA and Maurer, R (1978) Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29: 897912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golabadi, M, Arzani, A and Maibody, SAM (2006) Assessment of drought tolerance in segregating populations in durum wheat. African Journal of Agricultural Research 1: 162171.Google Scholar
Gorim, LY and Vandenberg, A (2017a) Evaluation of wild lentil species as genetic resources to improve drought tolerance in cultivated lentil. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1129. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorim, LY and Vandenberg, A (2017b) Root traits, nodulation and root distribution in soil for five wild lentil species and Lens culinaris (Medik.) grown under well-watered conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1632. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdy, A, Ragab, R and Scarascia-Mugnozza, E (2003) Coping with water scarcity: water saving and increasing water productivity. Irrigation and Drainage 52: 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2013) Stocker, TF, Dahe, Q, Plattner, GK, Tignor, M, Allen, SK, Boschung, J, Nauels, A, Xia, Y, Bex, V and Midgley, PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis, Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 2013.Google Scholar
Lawn, RJ (1989) Agronomic and physiological constraints to the productivity of tropical grain legumes and prospects for improvement. Experimental Agriculture 25: 509528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, MM and Muchow, RC (1990) Critical evaluation of the possibilities for modifying crops for high production per unit of precipitation. Advances in Agronomy 43: 107153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medrano, H, Tomás, M, Martorell, S, Flexas, J, Hernández, E, Rossello, J, Pou, A, Escalona, JM and Bota, J (2015) From leaf to whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE) in complex canopies: limitations of leaf WUE as a selection target. The Crop Journal 3: 220228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, J (2001) Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science India 80: 758762.Google Scholar
Passioura, JB (1977) Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 43: 117120.Google Scholar
Ramirez-Vallejo, P and Kelly, JD (1998) Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99: 127136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, S and Choudhuri, MA (1980) Regulation of flag leaf senescence in rice by nutrients and its impact on yield. Registered Independent Student Organization 29: 914.Google Scholar
Sauchyn, D and Kulshrehtha, S (2008) Prairies; in from impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate 2007 In: Lemmen, DS, Warren, FJ, Lacroix, J and Bush, E (eds.), From impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate 2007. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada, pp. 275328.Google Scholar
Solomon, KF and Labuschagne, MT (2003) Variation in water use and transpiration efficiency among durum wheat genotypes grown under moisture stress and non-stress conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 141: 3141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanhill, G (1987) Water use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 39: 5385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullu, A, Tar'an, B, Breitkreutz, C, Buchwaldt, L, Banniza, S, Warkentin, TD and Vandenberg, A (2006) A quantitative trait locus for resistance to ascochyta blight (Ascochyta lentis) maps close to a gene for resistance to anthracnose (Colletotrichum truncatum) in lentil. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 28: 558595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadez, V, Kholova, J, Medina, S, Kakkera, A and Anderberg, H (2014) Transpiration efficiency: new insight into an old story. Journal of Experimental Botany 65: 61416153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vicente-Serrano, SM, Lopez-Moreno, JI, Begueria, S, Lorenzo-Molina, C, Moran-Tejeda, E, Revuelto, J, Trigo, R, Coelho, F and Espejo, F (2014) Evidence of increasing drought severity caused by temperature rise in Southern Europe. Environmental Research Letters 9: 044001. doi: 1088/1748-9326/9/4/044001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, DH, Baudoin, JP, Beaver, JS, Coyne, DP, Halseth, DE, Masaya, PN, Munger, HM, Myers, JR and Silbernagel, M (1993) Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 2740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, MML, Gujaria-Verma, N, Ramsay, L, Yuan, HY, Caron, C, Diapari, M, Vandenberg, A and Bett, KE (2015) Classification and characterization of species within the genus lens using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). PLoS ONE 10(3): e0122025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, G, McNeil, DL and Hill, GD (2002) Breeding for resistance to lentil Ascochyta blight. Plant Breeding 121: 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Can wild lentil genotypes help improve water use and transpiration efficiency in cultivated lentil?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Can wild lentil genotypes help improve water use and transpiration efficiency in cultivated lentil?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Can wild lentil genotypes help improve water use and transpiration efficiency in cultivated lentil?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *