We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Sabrina Bendjaballah, Ali Tifrit and Laurence Voeltzel (eds.) (2021). Perspectives on Element Theory (Studies in Generative Grammar 143). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. v + 280
Review products
Sabrina Bendjaballah, Ali Tifrit and Laurence Voeltzel (eds.) (2021). Perspectives on Element Theory (Studies in Generative Grammar 143). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. v + 280
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
14 September 2022
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Anderson, John (1987). The tradition of structural analogy. In Steele, R. & Threadgold, T. (eds.) Language topics: essays in honour of Michael Halliday. John Benjamins, 33–43.Google Scholar
Anderson, John & Ewen, Colin (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John & Jones, Charles (1974). Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics10. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Peter & Idsardi, William J. (2001). Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In Hall, Tracy Alan (ed.) Distinctive Feature Theory. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 41–70.Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip (2011). An introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavirani, Edoardo & van Oostendorp, Marc (2020). A theory of the theory of vowels. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 37–56.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz (2011). Laryngeal realism and laryngeal relativism: two voicing systems in Polish?Studies in Polish Linguistics6. 45–80.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der (1993). Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology10. 209–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der (2020). Principles of Radical CV Phonology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Sean (1994). Is ʔ an element? Towards a non-segmental phonology. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics4. 71–78.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1985). The internal structure of phonological representations. Phonology Yearbook2. 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean (1996). CV as the only syllable type. In Durand, Jacques & Laks, Bernard (eds.) Current trends in phonology: models and methods, volume 2. Salford, Manchester: ESRI, 419–441.Google Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya (ed.) (2020). Morpheme-internal recursion in phonology. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus (2006). The structure of length. PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus & Kaye, Jonathan (2013). GP 2.0. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics16. 51–64.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget (2011). Phonological architecture: a biolinguistic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, Sandford (1984). The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology1. 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias (2004). A lateral theory of phonology, volume 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar