Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T15:01:51.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2009

Amalia Arvaniti  and
D. Robert Ladd
Amalia Arvaniti
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
D. Robert Ladd
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The intonation of Greek wh-questions consists of a rise-fall followed by a low plateau and a final rise. Using acoustic data, we show (i) that the exact contour shape depends on the length of the question, and (ii) that the position of the first peak and the low plateau depends on the position of the stressed syllables, and shows predictable adjustments in alignment, depending on the proximity of adjacent tonal targets. Models that specify the F0 of all syllables, or models that specify F0 by superposing contour shapes for shorter and longer domains, cannot account for such fine-grained lawful variation except by using ad hoc tonal specifications, which, in turn, do not allow for phonological generalisations about contours applying to utterances of greatly different lengths. In contrast, our findings follow easily from an autosegmental-metrical approach to intonational phonology, according to which melodies may contain long F0 stretches derived by interpolation between specified targets associated with metrically strong syllables and prosodic boundaries.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 43 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arvaniti, Amalia (2001). The intonation of wh-questions in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 21. 57–68.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia (2003). Peak scaling in Greek and the role of declination. In Solé et al. (2003). 2269–2272.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia (2007a). On the relationship between phonology and phonetics (or why phonetics is not phonology). In Trouvain & Barry (2007). 19–24.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia (2007b). On the presence of final lowering in British and American English. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Riad, Tomas (eds.) Tones and tunes. Vol. 2: Experimental studies in word and sentence prosody. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 317–347Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia (2007c). Greek phonetics: the state of the art. Journal of Greek Linguistics 8. 97–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Baltazani, Mary (2005). Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In Jun (2005). 84–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Godjevac, Svetlana (2003). The origins and scope of final lowering in English and Greek. In Solé et al. (2003). 1077–1080.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Ladd, D. Robert (1995). Tonal alignment and the representation of accentual targets. In Elenius, Kjell & Branderud, Peter (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 4. Stockholm: KTH & Stockholm University. 220–223.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert & Mennen, Ineke (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents. JPh 26. 3–25.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert & Mennen, Ineke (2000). What is a starred tone? Evidence from Greek. In Broe, Michael B. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 119–131.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert & Mennen, Ineke (2006a). Phonetic effects of focus and ‘tonal crowding’ in intonation: evidence from Greek polar questions. Speech Communication 48. 667–696.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert & Mennen, Ineke (2006b). Tonal association and tonal alignment: evidence from Greek polar questions and contrastive statements. Language and Speech 49. 421–450.Google Scholar
Baltazani, Mary (2002). Quantifier scope and the role of intonation in Greek. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Baltazani, Mary (2006). Intonation and pragmatic interpretation of negation in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1658–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Elam, Gayle Ayers (1997). Guidelines for ToBI Labelling. Available (January 2009) at http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/research/phonetics/E_ToBI/.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3. 255–309.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston & Beckman (1990). 341–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1992). Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta (1977). Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. & 't Hart, J. (1967). On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua 19. 177–192.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. (1993). Nasalisation in English: phonology or phonetics. Phonology 10. 43–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, William & Sorensen, John R. (1981). Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, Alex, Shosted, Ryan K., Davidson, Katherine, Salihie, Mohammad & Arvaniti, Amalia (2007). Comparing methods for locating pitch ‘elbows’. In Trouvain & Barry (2007). 1117–1120.Google Scholar
D'Imperio, Mariapaola (2000). The role of perception in defining tonal targets and their alignment. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya (1983). Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. In MacNeilage, Peter F. (ed.) The production of speech. New York: Springer. 39–55.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya (2004). Information, prosody, and modeling, with emphasis on tonal features of speech. In Bel, Bernard & Marlien, Isabelle (eds.) Speech prosody 2004. Nara, Japan. Available (January 2009) at http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2004.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya, Ohno, Sumio & Yagi, Takashi (1997). Analysis and modelling of fundamental frequency contours of Greek utterances. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997). Rhodes, Greece. 465–468.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya, Wang, Changfu, Ohno, Sumio & Gu, Wentao (2005). Analysis and synthesis of fundamental frequency contours of Standard Chinese using the command–response model. Speech Communication 47. 59–70.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan (1999). A gesture-based account of intrusive consonants in English. Phonology 16. 29–54.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan & Wilson, Ian (2006). Excrescent schwa and vowel laxing: cross-linguistic responses to conflicting articulatory targets. In Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, Douglas & Best, Catherine T. (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology 8. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 635–659.Google Scholar
Glasberg, Brian R. & Moore, Brian C. J. (1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research 47. 103–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabe, Esther (1998). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, Baumann, Stefan & Benzmüller, Ralf (2005). German intonation in Autosegmental-Metrical phonology. In Jun (2005). 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Martine, Ladd, D. Robert & Arvaniti, Amalia (2000). On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology 17. 143–185.Google Scholar
Gu, Wentao, Hirose, Keikichi & Fujisaki, Hiroya (2007). Analysis of tones in Cantonese speech based on the command–response model. Phonetica 64. 29–62.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Johan 't, Collier, René & Cohen, Antonie (1990). A perceptual study of intonation: an experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hermes, Dik J. & van Gestel, Joost C. (1991). The frequency scale of speech intonation. JASA 90. 97–102.Google Scholar
Holst, Tara & Nolan, Francis (1995). The influence of syntactic structure on [s] to [ʃ ] assimilation. In Connell, Bruce & Arvaniti, Amalia (eds.) Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 315–333.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho (1996). Place assimilation is not the result of gestural overlap: evidence from Korean and English. Phonology 13. 377–407.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) (2005). Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) (1990). Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanski, Greg & Shih, Chilin (2003). Prosody modeling with soft templates. Speech Communication 39. 311–352.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1983). Phonological features of intonational peaks. Lg 59. 721–759.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1988). Declination ‘reset’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. JASA 84. 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2008). Intonational phonology. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert & Johnson, Catherine (1987). ‘Metrical’ factors in the scaling of sentence-initial accent peaks. Phonetica 44. 238–245.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Pierrehumbert, Janet (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.) Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 157–233.Google Scholar
Lickley, Robin J., Schepman, Astrid & Ladd, D. Robert (2005). Alignment of ‘phrase accent’ lows in Dutch falling rising questions: theoretical and methodological implications. Language and Speech 48. 157–183.Google Scholar
Maeda, Shinji (1976). A characterization of American English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis (1992). The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation. In Docherty, Gerard J. & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 261–280.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1974). Experimental historical phonology. In Anderson, John M. & Jones, Charles (eds.) Historical linguistics. Vol. 2: Theory and description in phonology. Amsterdam: North Holland. 353–389.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. JASA 32. 693–703.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1980). The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1987, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Beckman, Mary E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar (2005). Stability effects in tonal clash contexts in Catalan. JPh 33. 215–242.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Santen, Jan van & Hirschberg, Julia (1995). Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish. JPh 23. 429–451.Google Scholar
Shih, Chilin, Kochanski, Greg & Yoon, Su-Youn (2007). The missing link between articulatory gestures and sentence planning. In Trouvain & Barry (2007). 35–38.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kim E. A. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1990). The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In Kingston, & Beckman, (1990). 72–106.Google Scholar
Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) (2003). Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Sternberg, S., Wright, C. E., Knoll, R. L. & Monsell, S. (1980). Motor programs in rapid speech: additional evidence. In Cole, Ronald A. (ed.) Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 507–534.Google Scholar
Sundberg, Johan (1979). Maximum speed of pitch changes in singers and untrained subjects. JPh 7. 71–79.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul (2000). Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt model. JASA 107. 1697–1714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.) (2007). Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dudweiler, Saarbrücken: Pirrot.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi (2005). Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication 46. 220–251.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi & Sun, Xuejing (2002). Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. JASA 111. 1399–1413.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi & Wang, Q. Emily (2001). Pitch targets and their realization: evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication 33. 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Yi & Xu, Ching X. (2005). Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. JPh 33. 159–197.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. (1994). Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences. JPh 22. 121–140.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. (1997). Features, gestures, and Igbo vowels: an approach to the phonology–phonetics interface. Lg 73. 227–274.Google Scholar