Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:24:36.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Curt Rice and Sylvia Blaho (eds.) (2009). Modeling ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory. (Advances in Optimality Theory.) London & Oakville, Conn.: Equinox Publishing. Pp. v+297.

Review products

Curt Rice and Sylvia Blaho (eds.) (2009). Modeling ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory. (Advances in Optimality Theory.) London & Oakville, Conn.: Equinox Publishing. Pp. v+297.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2011

Gunnar Ólafur Hansson
Gunnar Ólafur Hansson
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , May 2011 , pp. 129 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad (2000). Absolute ungrammaticality. In Dekkers, Joost, Leeuw, Frank van der & de Weijer, Jeroen van (eds.) Optimality Theory: phonology, syntax, and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, Adam (2003). A quantitative study of Spanish paradigm gaps. WCCFL 22. 1–14.Google Scholar
Alderete, John D. (2001). Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18. 201–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Arto (2002). Variation and phonological theory. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell. 206–243.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew (2008). Historical observations on defectiveness: the first singular non-past. Russian Linguistics 32. 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. LI 4. 3–16.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (1999). ‘When in doubt …’: intraparadigmatic dependencies and gaps in Icelandic. NELS 29:1. 105–119.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert (1975). Where the grammar fails. Lg 51. 859–872.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. (1981). Rules, constraints, and paradigm lacunae. Glossa 15. 136–144.Google Scholar
Klein, Thomas B. (2005). Infixation and segmental constraint effects: UM and IN in Tagalog, Chamorro, and Toba Batak. Lingua 115. 959–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulinich, Elena (2010). Les nouveaux verbes défectifs du russe. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Montréal.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van (2007). Derived environment effects and consistency of exponence. In Blaho, Sylvia, Bye, Patrik & Krämer, Martin (eds.) Freedom of analysis? Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan & Sprouse, Ronald L. (1999). From MParse to Control: deriving ungrammaticality. Phonology 16. 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pertsova, Katya (2005). How lexical conservatism can lead to paradigm gaps. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 11: Papers in Phonology 6. 13–38.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raffelsiefen, Renate (1992). A nonconfigurational approach to morphology. In Aronoff, Mark (ed.) Morphology now. Albany: State University of New York Press. 133–162.Google Scholar
Raffelsiefen, Renate (2004). Absolute ill-formedness and other morphophonological effects. Phonology 21. 91–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Curt (2005). Optimal gaps in optimal paradigms. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4. 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Curt (2007). Gaps and repairs at the phonology–morphology interface. JL 43. 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Andrea D. (2006). Minding the gaps: inflectional defectiveness in a paradigmatic theory. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Szakay, Anita & Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2010). A probabilistic approach to Hungarian paradigm gaps. Poster presented at the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest.Google Scholar
Weijer, Jeroen van de (2002). An Optimality Theoretic analysis of the Dutch diminutive. In Broekhuis, Hans & Fikkert, Paula (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 2002. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 199–209.Google Scholar