Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T08:01:29.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diana Archangeli & Douglas Pulleyblank (2022). Emergent Phonology. Berlin: Language Science Press. Pp. vi+193.

Review products

Diana Archangeli & Douglas Pulleyblank (2022). Emergent Phonology. Berlin: Language Science Press. Pp. vi+193.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2024

Shigeto Kawahara Open the ORCID record for Shigeto Kawahara [Opens in a new window]
Shigeto Kawahara*
Affiliation:
Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan. Email: kawahara@icl.keio.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , First View , pp. 1 - 6
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, Chen, Su-I & Wang, Chilin (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd & Gaissmaier, Wolfgang (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62, 451–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouskova, Maria (to appear). MSCs in positional neutralisation: the problem of gapped inventories. Phonology 40.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonetically-driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Darnell, Michael, Moravscik, Edith, Noonan, Michael, Newmeyer, Frederick & Wheatly, Kathleen (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics: volume 1: general papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 243–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Wilson, Colin (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. LI 39, 379–440.Google Scholar
Holtman, Astrid (1996). A generative theory of rhyme: an Optimality approach. PhD dissertation, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2018). Why underlying representations? JL 21, 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (1995). Japanese phonology. In Goldsmith, John (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 817–838.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20, 75–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. NELS 24, 333–379.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, 249–384.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary (2013). Rethinking the ‘duplication problem’. Lingua 126, 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, number 45 in Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas (2006). Minimizing UG: constraints upon constraints. WCCFL 25, 15–39.Google Scholar