Why The Idea Of Purpose Won't Go Away
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2011
Biologists' current habit of explaining each feature of human life separately through its evolutionary function – its assumed tendency to enhance each individual's reproductive prospects – is unworkable. It also sits oddly with these scientists' official rejection of teleology, since it treats all life as a process which does have an aim, namely, to perpetuate itself. But that aim is empty because it is circular.
If we want to understand the behaviour of living things (including humans) we have to treat them seriously as subjects, creatures with needs, tendencies and directions of their own. The supposedly objective idea of a world of objects without subjects is an unprofitable fantasy.
- Research Article
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2011
1 November 15, 2010, G2 Section
2 Gazzaniga, Michael, Human; The Science Behind What Makes Us Unique. (New York, Ecco, 2008), 107–9.Google Scholar
3 Absence of Mind; The Dispelling Of Inwardness From The Modern Myth Of The Self. (Yale University Press, 2010), 45–6 (Emphasis Mine).Google Scholar
4 Philosophical Investigations part I, section 23, G.E.M.Anscombe's translation
5 New York, W.W.Norton & Co 2004, 32.
6 The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Princeton University Press 1981), chapter III.Google Scholar
7 ‘Super-evolution; change for the common good' in New Scientist, Oct. 9th 2010.
8 (Harvard, Belknap Press, 1975).
9 See ‘The Evolution of Eusociality' by Martin A.Novak, Corina E.Tarnita and Edward O.Wilson in Nature for August 26 2010.
10 See ‘Why Richard Dawkins is Wrong About Religion', in The Edge Of Reason, (ed.) Bentley, Alex, (Continuum Press, 2008)Google Scholar.
11 In The Ant And The Peacock; Altruism and Sexual Selection From Darwin To Today, (Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.
12 The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford University Press 1986), 677Google Scholar. NB the final footnote.
14 Autobiographies of Thomas Henry Huxley and Charles Darwin (Oxford Universiy Press, 1974)Google Scholar, 54 (Emphasis mine).