Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:38:36.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Suggestions for Ramsey-Reducts of Infinite Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Zeno G. Swijtink*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berent, P.Theoretical Terms in Infinite Theories.” Philosophy of Science 40 (1973): 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W.Replacement of Auxiliary Expressions.” Philosophical Review 65 (1956): 3855.Google Scholar
Craig, W.On Axiomatizability Within a System.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (1953): 3032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W. and Vaught, R. L.Finite Axiomatizability Using Additional Predicates.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1958): 289308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, H. E.Ramsey-Sentences for Infinite Theories.” Philosophy of Science 42 (1975): 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L.Completeness in the Theory of Types.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (1950): 8191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. The Foundations of Mathematics. Edited by Braithwaite, R. B. New York: Humanities Press 1950.Google Scholar
Sneed, J. D. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swijtink, Z. G.Eliminability in a Cardinal.” Studia Logica 35 (1976): 7189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar