Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:09:51.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific Understanding after the Ingold Revolution in Organic Chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

William Goodwin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper characterizes the increase in ‘scientific understanding’ that resulted from the Ingold Revolution in organic chemistry. By describing both the sorts of explanations facilitated by Ingold's Revolution and the sense in which organic chemistry was ‘unified’ by adopting these approaches to explanation, one can appreciate how this revolution led to a dramatic qualitative improvement in organic chemists’ understanding of the phenomena that they study. The explanatory unification responsible for this transformation in organic chemistry is contrasted with contemporary philosophical accounts of unification and its relationship to both scientific understanding and explanation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 386 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akeroyd, F. M. (2000a), “Why Was a Fuzzy Model So Successful in Physical Organic Chemistry?”, Why Was a Fuzzy Model So Successful in Physical Organic Chemistry? 6:161–173.Google Scholar
Akeroyd, F. M. (2000b), “The Rise of the Hughes and Ingold Theory from 1930 through 1942”, The Rise of the Hughes and Ingold Theory from 1930 through 1942 2:99–125.Google Scholar
Benfey, O. T. (1964), From Vital Force to Structural Formulas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Benfey, O. T., and Morris, P. J. T., eds. (2001), Robert Burns Woodward: Architect and Artist in the World of Molecules. Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Brock, W. H. (2000), The Chemical Tree. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, C. A. (1961), Valence, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1974), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1974), “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Explanation and Scientific Understanding 71:5–19.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1965), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 2nd Edition. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goodwin, W. (2003), “Explanation in Organic Chemistry”, Explanation in Organic Chemistry 988:141–153.Google ScholarPubMed
Hammond, G. (1955), “A Correlation of Reaction Rates”, A Correlation of Reaction Rates 77:334–338.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. (1989), “Scientific Explanation: The Causes, Some of the Causes, and Nothing but the Causes”, in Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 283–306.Google Scholar
Ingold, C. K. (1934), “Principles of an Electronic Theory of Organic Reactions”, Principles of an Electronic Theory of Organic Reactions 15:225–274.Google Scholar
Ingold, C. K. (1953), Structure and Mechanism in Organic Chemistry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1981), “Explanatory Unification”, Explanatory Unification 48:507–531.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1985), “Two Approaches to Explanation”, Two Approaches to Explanation 82:632–639.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1989), “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 410–505.Google Scholar
Lowry, T., and Richardson, K. (1987), Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry, 3rd Edition. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Nye, M. J. (1993), From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scriven, M. (1988), “Explanations, Predictions, and Laws”, in Pitt, J. (ed.), Theories of Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press, 51–74.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, K., and Schore, N. (1994), Organic Chemistry, 2nd Edition. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, M. (2004), “Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation”, Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation 71:1071–1081.Google Scholar