Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-dr4jh Total loading time: 0.48 Render date: 2021-06-20T02:03:54.114Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Who Benefits from Distributive Politics? How the Outcome One Studies Affects the Answer One Gets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2013

Eric Kramon
Affiliation:
University of California–Los Angeles, and Center for Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law at Stanford University. E-mail: kramon@ucla.edu
Daniel N. Posner
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. E-mail: posner@mit.edu
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Papers in the burgeoning empirical literature on distributive politics often focus their analysis on the pattern of distribution of a single patronage good—for example, cash transfers, roads, education spending, electrification, or targeted grants. Yet because governments can favor constituencies through the targeting of multiple public and private goods, drawing general conclusions about distributive politics by investigating just one (or even a few) good(s) can be misleading. We demonstrate the severity of this problem by investigating a particular manifestation of distributive politics—ethnic favoritism—in a particular setting—Africa—and show that the conclusions one draws about who benefits from government allocation decisions can vary markedly depending on the outcome one happens to study. Our findings suggest the need for caution in making general claims about who benefits from distributive politics and raise questions about extant theoretical conclusions that are based on empirical work that focuses on a single distributive outcome. The findings also provide a foundation for a new research agenda aimed at identifying the reasons why political leaders choose to favor their supporters with some public and private goods rather than others.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alesina, Alberto, Danninger, Stephan, and Rostagno, Massimo V.. 1999. “Redistribution through Public Employment: The Case of Italy.” NBER Working Paper 7387, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Alperovich, Gershon. 1984. “The Economics of Choice in the Allocation of Intergovernmental Grants to Local Authorities.” Public Choice 44(2): 285–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arulampalam, Wiji, Dasgupta, Sugato, Dhillon, Amrita, and Dutta, Bhaskar. 2009. “Electoral Goals and Center-State Transfers: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence from India.” Journal of Development Economics 88(1): 103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avelino, George, Brown, David S., and Hunter, Wendy. 2005. “The Effects of Capital Mobility, Trade Openness, and Democracy on Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 625–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banful, Afua Branoah. 2008. “Can Institutions Reduce Clientelism? A Study of the District Assemblies Common Fund in Ghana.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Barkan, Joel D., and Chege, Michael. 1989. “Decentralising the State: District Focus and the Politics of Reallocation in Kenya.” Journal of Modern African Studies 27(3): 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bayart, Jean-Francois. 1993. The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher R, Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. 2010. “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 783–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Djankov, Simeon, Hanna, Rema, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2007. “Obtaining a Driver's License in India: An Experimental Approach to Studying Corruption.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(4): 1639–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Burgess, Robin. 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1415–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Kudamatsu, Masayuki. 2006. “Health and Democracy.” American Economic Review 96(2): 313–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birney, Mayling, Shapiro, Ian, and Graetz, Michael. 2008. “The Political Uses of Public Opinion: Lessons from the Estate Tax Repeal.” In Divide and Deal: The Politics of Distribution in Democracies, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Swenson, Peter, and Donno, Daniela. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brass, Jennifer. 2012. “Why Do NGOs Go Where They Go? Evidence from Kenya.” World Development 40(2): 387401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2004. “Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 35: 5581.Google Scholar
Burgess, Robin, Jedwab, Remi, Miguel, Edward, Morjaria, Ameet, and Miquel, Gerard Padro i. 2011. “Ethnic Favoritism.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, Anne. 2001. “Election Goals and Income Redistribution: Recent Evidence from Albania.” European Economic Review 45: 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, Antoni, and Solé-Ollé, Albert. 2005. “The Regional Allocation of Infrastructure Investment: The Role of Equity, Efficiency, and Political Factors.” European Economic Review 49(5): 1165–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Shawn. 2009. “Fixing Market Failures or Fixing Elections? Agricultural Credit in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(1): 219–50.Google Scholar
Crampton, Eric. 2004. “Distributive Politics in a Strong Party System: Evidence from Canadian Job Grant Programs.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz, and Johansson, Eva. 2002. “On the Vote Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 2740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Fuente, Angel, and Vives, Xavier. 1995. “Infrastructure and Education as Instruments of Regional Policy: Evidence from Spain.” Economic Policy 10(20): 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denemark, David. 2000. “Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Constituency-Level Grants.” Journal of Politics 62(3): 896915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Magaloni, Beatriz, and Estévez, Federico. 2011. “Strategies of Vote Buying: Democracy, Clientelism, and Poverty Relief in Mexico.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Politics 58(4): 1132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazen, Allan, and Eslava, Marcela. 2005. “Electoral Manipulation via Expenditure Composition: Theory and Evidence.” NBER Working Paper 11085. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad, and Harrison, Lauren. 2010. “Cross-cutting Cleavages and Ethnic Voting: An Experimental Study of Cousinage in Mali.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, Raymond. 2001. “Estimating the Value of Political Connections.” American Economic Review 91(4): 1095–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, Ray, and Wei, Shang-jin. 2004. “Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from ‘Missing’ Imports in China.” Journal of Political Economy 112(2): 471–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Raphael, and Rainer, Ilia. 2012. “Does the Leader's Ethnicity Matter? Ethnic Favoritism, Education and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa.” American Political Science Review 106(2): 294325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Álvaro., Álvarez-Dardet, Carlos, and Ruiz, Maria Teresa. 2004. “Effect of Democracy on Health: Ecological Study.” British Medical Journal 329(7480): 1421–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Picci, Lucio. 2005. “Proposal for a New Measure of Corruption, Illustrated with Italian Data.” Economics & Politics 17(1): 3775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Picci, Lucio. 2008. “Pork-Barrel Politics in Postwar Italy, 1953–94.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 268–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, Maria de los Angeles. 2002. “Do Changes in Democracy Affect the Political Budget Cycle? Evidence from Mexico.” Review of Development Economics 6(2): 204–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Harding, Robin, and Stasavage, David. 2011. “What Democracy Does (and Doesn't) Do for Basic Services: School Fees, School Quality, and African Elections.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2009. “Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy.” American Political Science Review 103(3): 387406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodler, Roland, and Raschky, Paul A.. 2010. “Foreign Aid and Enlightened Leaders.” Department of Economics Discussion Paper 54/10. Monash Univeristy.Google Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku, and Lee, Seungjoo. 2008. “The Presidency, Regionalism, and Distributive Politics in South Korea.” Comparative Political Studies 41(6): 861–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, Goran. 2006. African Politics in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jablonski, Ryan S. 2011. “Does Aid Target Votes? How Electoral Strategies Shape the Distribution of Aid?” Presented at the Working Group in African Political Economy Meeting, Stanford University, December 9–10, 2011.Google Scholar
Johansson, Eva. 2003. “Intergovernmental Grants as a Tactical Instrument: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Municipalities.” Journal of Public Economics 87(5-6): 883915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Peter, and Ward, Hugh. 2001. “Political Manipulation in a Majoritarian Democracy: Central Government Targeting of Public Funds to English Subnational Government, in Space and Across Time.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3(3): 308–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasara, Kimuli. 2007. “Tax Me If You Can: Ethnic Geography, Democracy and the Taxation of Agriculture in Africa.” American Political Science Review 101(1): 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitaev, Igor. 1999. “Private Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Re-examination of Theories and Concepts Related to its Development and Finance.” Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning/UNESCO.Google Scholar
Kramon, Eric, and Posner, Daniel N.. 2012. “Ethnic Favoritism in Primary Education in Kenya.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kudamatsu, Masayuki. 2007. “Ethnic Favoritism: Micro Evidence from Guinea.” IIES Working Paper.Google Scholar
Kudamatsu, Masayuki. 2012. “Has Democratization Reduced Infant Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Micro Data.” Journal of the European Economic Association 10(6): 1294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David, and Baum, Matthew. 2003. “The Political Economy of Growth: Democracy and Human Capital. American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 333–47.Google Scholar
Laswell, Harold. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D., and Snyder, James M.. 1995. “Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 958–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria, Perotti, Roberto, and Rostagno, Massimo. 2002. “Electoral Systems and the Composition of Public Spending.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 609–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, Kevin, and Smart, Michael. 2005. “Regional Grants as Pork Barrel Politics.” CES Working Paper No. 1453.Google Scholar
Min, Brian. 2010. “Democracy and Light: Public Service Provision in the Developing World.” Ph.D. diss., University of California-Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Morjaria, Ameet. 2011. “Electoral Competition and Deforestation: Micro Evidence from India.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Nunn, Nathan. 2011. “Gender and Missionary Influence in Colonial Africa.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Olken, Benjamin. 2006. “Corruption and the Costs of Redistribution: Micro Evidence from Indonesia.” Journal of Public Economics 90(4-5): 853–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pikketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pikketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2006. “The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 96(2): 200205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porto, Alberto, and Sanguinetti, Pablo. 2001. “Political Determinants of Intergovernmental Grants: Evidence from Argentina.” Economics & Politics 13(3): 237–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel N. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel N., and Simon, David J.. 2002. “Economic Conditions and Incumbent Support in Africa's New Democracies: Evidence from Zambia.” Comparative Political Studies 35(3): 313–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, M. Govinda, and Singh, N.. 2001. “The Political Economy of Center-State Fiscal Transfers in India.” Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform Working Paper No. 107.Google Scholar
Reinikka, Ritva, and Svensson, Jakob. 2004. “Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(2): 679705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 2007. “The Political Economy of Patronage: Expenditure Patterns in the Argentine Provinces, 1983–2003.” Journal of Politics 69(2): 363–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan, and Wilkinson, Steven. 2004. “The Shifting Political Economy of Redistribution in the Indian Federation.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2006. “Is Democracy Good for the Poor?American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 860–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapienza, Paola. 2004. “The Effects of Government Ownership on Bank Lending.” Journal of Financial Economics 72(2): 357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schady, Norbert R. 2000. “The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES), 1991–95.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 289304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2012. “Judgment and Measurement in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 10(1): 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2008. “Religion and Social Insurance: Evidence from the United States, 1970–2002.” In Divide and Deal: The Politics of Distribution in Democracies, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Swenson, Peter and Donno, Daniela. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2012. “Democracy, War, and Wealth: Lessons from Two Centuries of Inheritance Taxation.” American Political Science Review 106(1): 81102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1996. Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn against Government in U.S. Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Solé-Ollé, Albert, and Sorribas-Navarro, Pilar. 2008. “The Effects of Partisan Alignment on the Allocation of Intergovernmental Transfers: Differences-in-Differences Estimates for Spain.” Journal of Public Economics 92(12): 2302–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2005. “Democracy and Education Spending in Africa.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2011. “Buying Votes: Distributive Politics in Democracies.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 2008. “Good Distribution, Bad Delivery, and Ugly Politics: The Traumatic Beginnings of Germany's Health Care System.” In Divide and Deal: The Politics of Distribution in Democracies, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Swenson, Peter and Donno, Daniela. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2009. “Geographically Targeted Spending: Exploring the Electoral Strategies of Incumbent Government.” European Political Science Review 1(1): 102–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 1996. “The Politics of Intergovernmental Transfers in Post-Soviet Russia.” British Journal of Political Science 26(3): 299335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaishnav, Milan, and Sircar, Neelanjan. 2009. “The Geography of Patronage: Building Schools in India.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2–5, 2009.Google Scholar
van de Walle, Nicolas. 2001. African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979–1999. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga, Linda Goncalves, and Pinho, Maria Manuel. 2007. “The Political Economy of Intergovernmental Grants: Evidence from a Maturing Democracy.” Public Choice 133(3-4): 457–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Limin. 2003. “Determinants of Child Morality in LDCs: Empirical Findings from Demographic and Health Surveys.” Health Policy 65(3): 277–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2006. “Partisanship and Protest: The Politics of Workfare Distribution in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 41(3): 122–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, Harold. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Matthew S. 2009. “The Political Targeting of a Cash Transfer Program in Ecuador.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2–5, 2009.Google Scholar
Woodberry, Robert D. 2012. “The Missionary Roots of Liberal Democracy.” American Political Science Review 106(2): 244–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, Andrew C., and Dollery, Brian E.. 1998. “The Political Determination of Intergovernmental Grants in Australia.” Public Choice 94(3): 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar. 2008. “The President's ‘New’ Constituency: Lula and the Pragmatic Vote in Brazil's 2006 Presidential Election.” Journal of Latin American Studies 40(1): 2949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kramon Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Kramon Supplementary Material(File)
File 50 KB
99
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Who Benefits from Distributive Politics? How the Outcome One Studies Affects the Answer One Gets
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Who Benefits from Distributive Politics? How the Outcome One Studies Affects the Answer One Gets
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Who Benefits from Distributive Politics? How the Outcome One Studies Affects the Answer One Gets
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *