Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-5dv6l Total loading time: 0.467 Render date: 2021-06-16T21:38:26.555Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2013

John R. Hibbing
Affiliation:
Political Physiology Lab, University of Nebraska–Lincoln (unl.edu/polphyslab)

Abstract

Political science is far behind the other social science disciplines in incorporating neurobiological concepts, techniques, and theory. In recent years progress has been made in closing this gap but many in the political science mainstream view the movement with concern or even horror. Though a healthy dose of skepticism is appropriate and beneficial to the scientific endeavor, negative reactions to viewing politics through a neurobiological lens are often based on fundamental misconceptions regarding both neurobiology and politics. In this Reflections essay, I address ten of these misconceptions, including the beliefs that biology is deterministic, reductionist, unnecessary, irrelevant, normatively dangerous, and ideologically biased. The goal is to encourage a constructive dialogue on the relevance of neurobiology to political life—a dialogue that would in turn improve research in the fledgling subfield and lead to innovations in political science by encouraging new ways of conceptualizing and analyzing the variables at the discipline's core.

Type
Reflections
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Ackerman, Joshua M., Nocera, Christopher C., and Bargh, John A.. 2010. “Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions.” Science 328(5986): 1712–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L., and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?American Political Science Review 99(2): 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Kristen, Wagner, Michael, Jacobs, Carly M., Smith, Kevin B., and Hibbing, John R.. 2012. “Beyond Survey Self-Reports: Using Physiology to Tap Political Orientations.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago, July 6–9.Google Scholar
Barker, David C., and Tinnick, James D.. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological Constraint.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Jonah, Meredith, Marc, and Wheeler, S. Christion. 2008. “Contextual Priming: Where People Vote Affects How They Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 105(26): 8846–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, Jack, and Block, Jeanne H.. 2006. “Nursery School Personality and Political Orientation Two Decades Later.” Journal of Research in Personality 40(5): 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaert, Anthony F. 2006. “Biological versus Nonbiological Older Brothers and Men's Sexual Orientation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(28): 10771–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Barbaranelli, Claudio, and Zimbardo, Phillip G.. 1999. “Personality Profiles and Political Parties.” Political Psychology 20(1): 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, Dana R., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D., and Potter, J.. 2008. “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind.” Political Psychology 29(6): 807–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carraro, Luciana, Castelli, Luigi, and Macchiella, C.. 2011. “The Automatic Conservative: Ideology-Based Attentional Asymmetries in the Processing of Valenced Information.” PLoS ONE 6(11): e26456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, Avshalom, Sugden, Karen, Moffitt, Terrie E., Taylor, Alan, Craig, Ian W., Harrington, Honalee, McClay, Joseph, Mill, Jonathan, Martin, Judy, Braithwaite, Antony, and Poulton, Richie. 2003. Influence of Life Stress on Depression: Moderation by a Polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene.” Science 18(July): 386–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Evan. 2008. “Genes and Ideologies.” Perspectives on Politics 6(2): 299320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Evan, and English, William. 2012. “Candidate Genes and Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review 106(1): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Gregory, and Harpending, Henry. 2009. The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., and Hamrick, N.. 2003. “Stable Individual Differences in Physiological Response to Stressors.” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 17: 407–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, Michael D., Balzer, Amanda, Jacobs, Carly M., Gruszczynski, Michael W., Smith, Kevin B., and Hibbing, John R.. 2012. “The Political Left Rolls with the Good; The Political Right Confronts the Bad.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 367(1589): 640–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, Michael D., Hibbing, John R., and Smith, Kevin B.. 2011. “The Politics of Attention: Gaze Cuing Effects Are Moderated by Political Temperament.” Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 73(1): 24–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagleman, David M. 2011. Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Stephen G. 2010. “Theory Trouble: The Case of Biopolitical Science.” Austrian Journal of Political Science 2010(1): 5571.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003a. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 24(1): 4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003b. “Values, Ideology, and the Structure of Political Attitudes.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, J.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura A., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102(2): 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Dawes, Cristopher T.. 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 79(3): 579–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Schreiber, Darren. 2008. “Biology, Politics, and the Emerging Science of Human Nature.” Science 322: 912–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, Jeffrey A., Smith, Kevin B., Guck, Adam, Alford, John R., Birnie, Andrew K., and Hibbing, John R.. 2011. “The Stress of Politics: Endocrinology and Voter Participation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Istanbul, July 9–12.Google Scholar
Galdi, Silvia, Arcuri, Luciana, and Gawronski, Bertram. 2008. “Automatic Mental Associations Predict Future Choices of Undecided Decision-makers.” Science 321(5892): 1100–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Schachar, Ron. 2003. “Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47(3): 540–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Ha, Shang. 2010. “Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golec, Aleksandra. 2002. “Need for Cognitive Closure and Political Conservatism: Studies of the Relationship.” Polish Psychological Bulletin 33: 512.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Haidt, Jonathan, and Nosek, Brian A.. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5): 1029–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammock, Elizabeth A.D., and Young, Larry J.. 2002. “Variation in the Vasopressin V1a Receptor Promoter and Expression: Implications for Inter- and Intraspecific Variation in Social Behavior.” European Journal of Neuroscience 16: 399402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K, and McDermott, Rose. 2011. Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Medland, Sara, Morley, Kate, Heath, Anthony C., and Martin, Nicholas G.. 2007. “The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study.” Behavior Genetics 37(3): 435–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helzer, Erik G., and Pizarro, David A.. 2011. “Dirty Liberals! Reminders of Physical Cleanliness Influence Moral and Political Attitudes.” Psychological Science 22(4): 517–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hetherington, Marc J., and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, Jordan B., DeYoung, Colin G., Xu, Xiaowen, and Peterson, Jordan B.. 2010. “Compassionate Liberals and Polite Conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness with Political Ideology and Moral Values.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(5): 655–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huizenga, Nannett A.T.M., Koper, Jan W., de Lange, Peiter, Pols, Huibert A.R., Stolk, Ronald P., Grobbee, Diederick E., de Jong, Frank H., and Lamberts, Steven W.J.. 1998. “Interperson Variability but Intraperson Stability of Baseline Plasma Cortisol Concentrations, and Its Relation to Feedback Sensitivity of the HPA Axis to a Low Dose of Dexamethasone in Elderly Individuals.” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 83(1): 4754.Google ScholarPubMed
Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David A., and Bloom, Paul. 2009. “Conservatives are More Easily Disgusted than Liberals.” Cognition and Emotion 23(4): 714–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David A., and Bloom, Paul. 2012. “Disgusting Smells Cause Decreased Liking of Gay Men.” Emotion 12(1): 2327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David A., Knobe, J., and Bloom, Paul. 2009. “Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays.” Emotion 9(3): 435–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura, and Bowers, Jake. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Journal of Politics 71(3): 782–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan. 2003. “Bounded Rationality in Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Theory 13: 395412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T. 2006. “The End of the End of Ideology.” American Psychologist 61(7): 651–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jost, John T., and Amodio, David M.. 2011. “Political Ideology as Motivated Social Cognition: Behavioral and Neuroscientific Evidence.” Motivation and Emotion 36(1): 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaminsky, Zachary A., et al. 2009. “DNA Methylation Profiles in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins.” Nature Genetics 41: 240–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, Milton, and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 80(2): 505–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2005. “The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.” Political Psychology 26(3): 455–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Eleanor A., Woollett, Katharine, and Spiers, Hugo J.. 2006. “London Taxi Drivers and Bus Drivers: A Structural MRI and Neuropsychological Analysis.” Hippocampus 16: 1091–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, George W., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, Roger D., and Coplan, Myron S.. 1999. “Water Treatment with Silicofluorides and Lead Toxicity.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 56(4): 435–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Herbert. 1958. “Conservatism and Personality.” American Political Science Review 52(1): 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. “The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 691706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 2010. Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxley, Douglas R., Smith, Kevin B., Alford, John R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Miller, Jennifer L., Scalora, Mario, Hatemi, Peter K., and Hibbing, John R.. 2008. “Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits.” Science 321(5896): 1667–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, Michael Bang. 2009. “Public Opinion and Evolved Heuristics: The Role of Category-Based Inference.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 9(3): 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Stephen. 2002. The Blank Slate. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Piurko, Yuval, Schwartz, Shalom H., and Davidov, Eldad. 2011. “Basic Personal Values and the Meaning of Left-Right Political Orientations in 20 Countries.” Political Psychology 32(40): 537–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 2002. “Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 4156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, Carol A., Johnson, Ronald C., and McArdle, John J.. 1999. “Chorion Type as a Possible Influence on the Results and Interpretation of Twin Study Data.” Twin Research 2(December): 244–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prior, Markus. 2010. “You've Either Got It or You Don't? The Stability of Political Interest Over the Life Cycle.” Journal of Politics 72(3): 747–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutchick, Andrew M. 2010. “Deus ex Machina: The Influence of Polling Place on Voting Behavior.” Political Psychology 31(2): 209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, Simone, Haidt, Jonathan, Clore, Gerald L., and Jordan, Alexander H.. 2008. “Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(8): 1096–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, John R. 2006. Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language and Political Power. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Settle, Jaime E., Dawes, Christopher T., Christakis, Nicholas A., and Fowler, James H.. 2010. “Friendships Moderate an Association between Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology.” Journal of Politics 72(4): 1189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigelman, Lee. 2006. “Report of the Editor of the American Political Science Review, 2004–5.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39(1): 171–73.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A, 1991. “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning.” Organizational Science 2: 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2011a. “Disgust Sensitivity and the Neurophysiology of Left-right Political Orientations.” PLoS ONE 6(10): e25552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2011b. “Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology.” Political Psychology 32(3): 369–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Peterson, Stephen A.. 1997. Darwinism, Dominance, and Democracy: The Biological Bases of Authoritarianism. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Peterson, Stephen A.. 1998. “Biopolitics after Three Decades—A Balance Sheet. British Journal of Political Science 28(3): 559–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhay, Elizabeth, and Jayaratne, Toby Epstein. 2012. “When Does Biology Justify Ideology? Political Ideology and the ‘Nature v. Nurture’ Debate.” Unpublished manuscript, Lafayette College.Google Scholar
Tesser, Abraham. 1993. “The Importance of Heritability in Psychological Research: The Case of Attitudes.” Psychological Review 100: 129–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theodoridis, Alexander, and Nelson, Amy J.. 2012. “Of BOLD Claims and Excessive Fears.” Political Psychology 33(1): 2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil, Jacob M. 2010. “Political Leanings Vary with Facial Expression Processing and Psychosocial Functioning.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 13(5): 547–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walum, Hasse, Westberg, Lars, Henningsson, Susanne, Neiderhiser, Jenae M., al, David Ross et. 2008. “Genetic Variation in the Vasopressin Receptor 1a Gene (AVPR1A) Associates with Pair bonding Behavior in Humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(37): 14153–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheatley, Thalia, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2005. “Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe.” Psychological Science 16: 780–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E.O. 1998. Conscilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *