Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-rbzxz Total loading time: 0.325 Render date: 2022-05-16T12:21:36.873Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Between Science and Engineering: Reflections on the APSA Presidential Task Force on Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance

Electoral Rules and Political Inclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2013

Mona Lena Krook
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Robert G. Moser
Affiliation:
University of Texas

Abstract

Political scientists have contributed to the world of electoral systems as scientists and as engineers. Taking stock of recent scientific research, we show that context modifies the effects of electoral rules on political outcomes in specific and systematic ways. We explore how electoral rules shape the inclusion of women and minorities, the depth and nature of political competition, and patterns of redistribution and regulation, and we consider institutional innovations that could promote political equality. Finally, we describe the diverse ways that political scientists produce an impact on the world by sharing and applying their knowledge of the consequences of electoral rules and global trends in reform.

Type
Symposium: Between Science and Engineering
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alionescu, Ciprian-Calin. 2004. “Parliamentary Representation of Minorities in Romania.” Southeast European Politics 5(1): 6075.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: Gender Quotas for Female Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2): 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, Joel. 1995. “Elections in Agrarian Societies.” Journal of Democracy 6(4): 106–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Gretchen, and Britton, Hannah. 2006. “Women in African Parliaments: A Continental Shift?” In Women in African Parliaments, ed. Bauer, Gretchen and Britton, Hannah. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen, and Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2007. “Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women's Political Representation.” Perspectives on Politics 5(3): 553–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2003. “The Political Representation of Women and Ethnic Minorities in Established Democracies.” Presented at the Academy of Migration Studies in Denmark, Aalborg University, November 11, 2003.Google Scholar
Bjarnegård, Elin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2011. “International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures.” International Organization 65(1): 103–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?American Political Science Review 90(4): 794812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44(2): 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, Krook, Mona Lena, and Meier, Petra. 2011. “The Rise of Gender Quota Laws: Expanding the Spectrum of Determinants for Electoral Reform.” West European Politics 34(3): 514–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, ed. 2006. Women, Quotas, and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fréchette, Guillaume R., Maniquet, Francois, and Morelli, Massimo. 2008. “Incumbents' Interests, Voters' Bias and Gender Quotas.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 891909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita, Dahlerup, Drude, and Skjeie, Hege. 2006. “The Nordic Countries: An Incremental Model.” In Women, Quotas, and Politics, ed. Dahlerup, Drude. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geddis, Andrew. 2006. “A Dual Track Democracy? The Symbolic Role of the Maori Seats in New Zealand's Electoral System.” Election Law Journal 5(4): 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzell, Caroline, and Hoddie, Matthew. 2003. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 318–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmsten, Stephanie, Moser, Robert G., and Slosar, Mary. 2010. “Do Ethnic Parties Exclude Women?Comparative Political Studies 43(10): 1179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2(3): 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Jones, Mark. 2002. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership in Latin America.” In Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Craske, Nikki and Molyneux, Maxine. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Ossa, Juan Pablo. 2013. “Political Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Indigenous Reservations and Gender Parity in Bolivia.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(1): 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M. 2011. “Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 604–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie, Krook, Mona Lena, and Paxton, Pamela. 2012. “Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas.” Working Paper under review.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2008. “Work and Power: The Connection Between Female Labor Force Participation and Female Political Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 479–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2010. Women, Work, and Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Evidence from the Latin American Vanguard.” Comparative Political Studies 42(1): 5681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva. 1991. “Political Participation and Parliamentary Careers: Women's Quotas in West Germany.” West European Politics 14(1): 5672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2007. “Gender and Political Institutions: Implementing Quotas for Women in Politics.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30-September 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and O'Brien, Diana Z.. 2010. “The Politics of Group Representation: Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide.” Comparative Politics 42(3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, O'Brien, Diana Z., and Swip, Krista M.. 2010. “Military Invasion and Women's Political Representation.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 12(1): 6679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. “Constitutional Choices for New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 15(2): 96109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longman, Timothy. 2006. “Rwanda: Achieving Equality or Serving an Authoritarian State?” In Women in African Parliaments, ed. Britton, Hannah and Bauer, Gretchen. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa, eds. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard. 1993. “Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway.” Journal of Politics 55(3): 737–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard. 1998. “Women's Legislative Representation in National Legislatures: A Comparison of Democracies in Developed and Developing Countries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(1): 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard, and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single Member and Multi-Member Districts.” Journal of Politics 58(3): 707–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2004. “The Mutual Contagion Effect of Legal and Party Quotas: A Belgian Perspective.” Party Politics 10(5): 583600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Robert G. 2001. “The Effects of Electoral Systems on Women's Representation in Post-Communist States.” Electoral Studies 20(3): 353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Robert G. 2008. “Electoral Systems and the Representation of Ethnic Minorities: Evidence from Russia.” Comparative Politics 40(3): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Robert G., and Scheiner, Ethan. 2012. Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, and Hughes, Melanie M.. 2007. Women, Politics and Power: A Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2005. “Reserved Seats in National Legislatures: A Research Note.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(2): 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2010. “Electoral Democratization in Nepal.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 40(3): 509–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2011. Designing Democracy in a Dangerous World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rigby, Andrew. 2000. “Lebanon: Patterns of Confessional Politics.” Parliamentary Affairs 53(1): 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(1): 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., Malecki, Michael, and Crisp, Brian. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40(3): 693709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67(2): 407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2006. “Do Interest Groups Represent the Disadvantaged? Advocacy at the Intersection of Race, Class, and Gender.” Journal of Politics 68(4): 893908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cott, Donna. 2005. “Building Inclusive Democracies: Indigenous Peoples and Ethnic Minorities in Latin America.” Democratization 12(5): 820–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2007. Engendering Transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Between Science and Engineering: Reflections on the APSA Presidential Task Force on Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Between Science and Engineering: Reflections on the APSA Presidential Task Force on Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Between Science and Engineering: Reflections on the APSA Presidential Task Force on Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *