Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:32:59.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synergy advances parasite taxonomy and systematics: an example from elasmobranch tapeworms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2011

JANINE N. CAIRA
JANINE N. CAIRA*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Unit 3043, 75 N. Eagleville Rd., Storrs, Connecticut, USA06269-3043
*
*For correspondence: Tel: 860-486-4060; Fax: 860-486-6364; E-mail: janine.caira@uconn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The synergism facilitated by a series of recent developments has conspired to catalyze rapid advancements in the taxonomy and systematics of elasmobranch tapeworms. These developments are: (1) increased interest in global biodiversity; (2) globalization-facilitated communication; (3) enhanced microscopic and digital technologies; (4) availability of web-based taxonomic resources; (5) ease of use and low cost of molecular techniques and (6) the impressive repertoire of available phylogenetic methods. As a consequence, an estimation of global elasmobranch tapeworm diversity is now within our grasp, as is a basic understanding of the effort and resources required to complete the discovery and description of this fauna globally. The generation of robust hypotheses of the phylogenetic relationships for most elasmobranch-parasitizing cestode orders is also well underway. An international community of cestodologists has emerged and through their sharing of knowledge and specimens is making great strides towards expanding knowledge of the cestode fauna of vertebrates worldwide. It is important that these efforts continue to move forward in a collaborative fashion, integrating morphological and molecular data, but also fully engaging elasmobranch taxonomists and systematists. It is equally important that efforts to characterize and describe global biodiversity are not derailed by such seductive, but ultimately unrewarding impracticable initiatives as molecular taxonomy. Integrated taxonomy is certainly not for the feint of heart, but those with the courage to pursue this strategy will be responsible for maintaining and enhancing the biologically relevant context required for effective species recognition well into the future.

Keywords

Taxonomycestodesbarcodingelasmobranchs
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 138 , Special Issue 13: Systematics as a cornerstone of parasitology , November 2011 , pp. 1675 - 1687
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, C. G. (1963). Tetraphyllidean and diphyllidean cestodes of New Zealand selachians. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand Zoology 3, 117–142.Google Scholar
Beveridge, I. (1990 a). Taxonomic revision of Australian Eutetrarhynchidae Guiart (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha). Invertebrate Taxonomy 4, 785–845.Google Scholar
Beveridge, I. (1990 b). Revision of the family Gilquiniidae (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha) from elasmobranch fishes. Australian Journal of Zoology 37, 481–520.Google Scholar
Beveridge, I. (1999). Preliminary cladistic analysis of genera of the cestode order Trypanorhyncha Diesing, 1863. Systematic Parasitology 42, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beveridge, I. (2008). Redescriptions of species of Tetrarhynchobothrium Diesing, 1850 and Didymorhynchus Beveridge and Campbell, 1988 (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha), with the description of Zygorhynchus borneensis n. sp. Systematic Parasitology 69, 75–88.Google Scholar
Beveridge, I. and Campbell, R. A. (2005). Three new genera of trypanorhynch cestodes from Australian elasmobranch fishes. Systematic Parasitology 609, 211–224.Google Scholar
Beveridge, I. and Justine, J.-L. (2006). Gilquiniid cestodes (Trypanorhyncha) from elasmobanch fishes off New Caledonia with descriptions of two new genera and a new species. Systematic Parasitology 65, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beveridge, E. and Justine, J.-L. (2007). Paragrillotia apecteta n. sp. and redescription of P. spratti (Campbell and Beveridge, 1993) n. comb. (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha) from hexanchid and carcharhinid sharks off New Caledonia. Zoosystema 29, 381–391.Google Scholar
Bray, R. A., Jones, A. and Hoberg, E. P. (1999). Observations on the phylogeny of the cestode order Pseudophyllidea Carus, 1863. Systematic Parasitology 42, 13–20.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. R. (1977). Six new species of tetraphyllidean cestodes, including a new genus, from a marine stingray Himantura schmardae (Werner, 1904) from Colombia. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 44, 51–59.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. R., Hoberg, E. P. and Weekes, P. J. (1991). Prelminary phylogenetic systematic analysis of the major lineages of the Eucestodea (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 104, 651–668.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. R., Mayes, M. A. and Thorson, T. B. (1981). Systematic review of cestodes infecting freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) including four new species from Venezuela. Proceedings of the Helminthologcal Society of Washington 48, 43–64.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. R. and McLennan, D. A. (1993). Parascript: Parasites and the Language of Evolution. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Butler, S. A. (1987). Taxonomy of some tetraphyllidean cestodes from elasmobranch fishes. Australian Journal of Zoology 35, 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caira, J. N. (1990). Parasites as Indicators for Elasmobranch Biology. Proceedings of the U.S./Japan Workshop on Elasmobranchs as Living Resources. NOAA Technical Report N.M.F.S. 90, 71–96.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N. and Healy, C. J. (2004). Elasmobranchs as hosts of metazoan parasites. In The Biology of Sharks and their Relatives. (ed. Carrier, J., Musack, J. and Heithaus, E.), pp. 523–551.CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N. and Jensen, K. (2001). An investigation of the coevolutionary relationships between onchobothriid tapeworms and their elasmobranch hosts. International Journal for Parasitology. 31, 959–974.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N. and Jensen, K. (2009). Erection of a new onchobothriid genus (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) and the description of five new species from whaler sharks (Carcharhinidae). Journal of Parasitology 95, 924–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caira, J. N., Jensen, K. and Healy, C. J. (1999). On the phylogenetic relationships among the tetraphyllidean, lecanicephalidean and diphyllidean tapeworm genera. Systematic Parasitology. 42, 77–151.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N., Jensen, K. and Healy, C. J. (2001). Interrelationships among tetraphyllidean and lecanicephalidean cestodes. In Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes (ed. Littlewood, D. T. J. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 135–158. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N., Jensen, K. and Rajan, C. (2007). Seven new Yorkeria species (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Borneo and Australia and their implications for Chiloscyllium (Elasmobranchii: Orectolobiformes) identification. Journal of Parasitology 93, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caira, J. N., Kuchta, R. and Desjardins, L. (2010). A new genus and two new species of Aporhynchidae (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha) from catsharks (Carcharhiniforms: Scyliorhinidae) off Taiwan. Journal of Parasitology 96, 1185–1190.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N., Mega, J. and Ruhnke, T. R. (2005 b). An unusual blood sequestering tapeworm (Sanguilevator yearsleyi n. gen., n. sp.) from Borneo with description of Cathetocephalus resendezi n. sp. from Mexico and molecular support for the recognition of the order Cathetocephalidea (Platyhelminthes: Eucestoda). International Journal for Parasitology 35, 1135–1152.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N., Richmond, C. and Swanson, J. (2005 a). A revision of Phoreiobothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) with descriptions of five new species. Journal of Parasitology. 91, 1153–1174.Google Scholar
Caira, J. N. and Ruhnke, T. R. (1990). A new species of Calliobothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the whiskery shark, Furgaleus macki in Australia. Journal of Parasitology 76, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caira, J. N. and Runkle, L. S. (1993). Two new tapeworms from the goblin shark Mitsukurina owstoni off Australia. Systematic Parasitology 26, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caira, J. N., Scholz, T. and Georgiev, B. B. (2006). Cestode systematics and phylogeny move forward. Systematic Parasitology 65, 171–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caira, J. N., Tracy, R. and Euzet, L. (2004). Five new species of Pedibothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the tawny nurse shark, Nebrius ferrugineus in the Pacific Ocean. Journal of Parasitology 90, 386–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. A. (1969). New species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Chesapeake Bay, Virginia. Journal of Parasitology 55, 559–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. A. (1970). Notes on tetraphyllidean cestodes from the Atlantic Coast of North America, with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Parasitology 56, 498–508.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. A. and Beveridge, I. (1993). New species of Grillotia and Pseudogrillotia (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha) from Australian sharks, and definition of the family Grillotiidae Dollfus, 1969. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 117, 37–46.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. A. and Beveridge, I. (1994). Order Trypanorhyncha Diesing, 1963. In Keys to the Cestode Parasites of Vertebrates. (ed. Khalil, L. F., Jones, A. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 51–148. CAB International.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. A. and Beveridge, I. (2002). The genus Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) parasitic in Australian elasmobranch fishes. Invertebrate Systematics 16, 237–344.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. A. and Beveridge, I. (2006). Three new genera and seven new species of trypanorhynch cestodes (family Eutetrarhynchidae) from manta rays, Mobula spp. (Mobulidae) from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Folia Parasitologica. 53, 255–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvajal, J. (1974). Records of cestodes from Chilean sharks. Journal of Parasitology 60, 29–34.Google Scholar
Carvajal, J. and Dailey, M. D. (1975). Three new species of Echeneibothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the skate, Raja chilensis Guichenot, 1948, with comments on mode of attachment and host specificity. Journal of Parasitology 61, 89–94.Google Scholar
Casiraghi, M., Labra, M., Ferri, E., Galimberti, A. and De Mattia, F. (2010). DNA barcoding: theoretical aspects and practical applications. In Tools for Identifying Biodiversity: Progress and Problems. (ed. Nimis, P. L. and Vignes, R. L.), pp. 269–273. EUT Edizioni Universitá di Trieste.Google Scholar
Chervy, L. (2002). The terminology of larval cestodes or metacestodes. Systematic Parasitology. 52, 1–33.Google Scholar
Chervy, L. (2009). Unified terminology for cestode microtriches: a proposal from the International workshops on Cestode Systematics in 2002–2008. Folia Parasitologica 56, 199–230.Google Scholar
Cislo, P. R. and Caira, J. N. (1993). The parasite assemblage in the spiral intestine of the shark Mustelus canis. Journal of Parasitology 79, 886–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compagno, L. J. V. (2005). Global checklist of living chondrichthyan fishes. In Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: The Status of Chondrichthyan Fishes (ed. Fowler, S. L., Cavanagh, R. D., Camhi, M., Burgess, G. H., Cailliet, G. M., Fordham, S. V., Simpfendorfer, C. A. and Musick, J. A.), pp. 401–423. IUCN/SSC Shark Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Compagno, L. J. V., White, W. T. and Cavanagh, R. D. (2010). Glyphis fowlerae sp. nov., a new species of river shark (Carcharhiniformes; Carcharhinidae) from northeastern Borneo. In Descriptions of New Sharks and Rays from Borneo (ed. Last, P. R., White, W. T., Pogonoski, J. J.), pp. 29–44. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 032.Google Scholar
Conn, D. B. and Swiderski, Z. (2008). A standardized terminology of the embryonic envelopes and associated developmental stages of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda). Folia Parasitologica 55, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, L. G., Edwards, R. D., Crisp, M. D. and Hardy, N. B. (2010). Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions? Invertebrate Systematics 24, 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, S. and Caira, J. N. (1995). Attachment site specificity of the tapeworm assemblage in the spiral intestine of the blue shark (Prionace glauca). Journal of Parasitology 81, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dailey, M. D. (1969). Litobothrium alopias and L. coniformis, two new cestodes representing a new order from elasmobranch fishes. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 36, 218–224.Google Scholar
Dailey, M. D. (1971). Litobothrium gracile sp. n. (Eucestoda: Litobothriidea) from the sand shark (Odontaspis ferox). Journal of Parasitology 57, 94–96.Google Scholar
deCarvalho, M. R. and Bockmann, F. A. (2008). Systematics must embrace comparative biology and evolution, not speed and automation. Evolutionary Biology 35, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSalle, R., Egan, M. G. and Siddall, M. (2005). The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 360, 1905–1916.Google Scholar
Desjardins, L. and Caira, J. N. (2011). Three new species of Spiniloculus (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Chiloscyllium punctatum (Elasmobranchii: Orectolobiformes) off Borneo with clarification of the type of the genus. Folia Parasitologica 58, 55–68.Google Scholar
Ebach, M. C. and deCarvalho, M. R. (2010). Anti-intellectualism in the DNA Barcoding Enterprise. Zoologia 27, 165–178.Google Scholar
Ebach, M. C. and Holdrege, C. (2005). More taxonomy, not DNA barcoding. BioScience 55, 822–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euzet, L. (1959). Recherches sur les cestodes tétraphyllides des sélaciens de côte de France. Thèses présenteés à la Faculté des Sciences de Montpellier, France. 236 pp.Google Scholar
Ferri, E., Barbuto, M., Bain, O., Galimbert, A., Uni, S., Guerrero, R., Ferté, H., Bandi, C., Martin, C. and Casiraghi, M. (2009). Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda). Frontiers in Zoology 6, 1–12. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-1.Google Scholar
Fyler, C. (2009). Systematics, biogeography and character evolution in the tapeworm genus Acanthobothrium van Beneden, 1850. PhD Dissertation, University of Connecticut. 182 pp.Google Scholar
Fyler, C. and Caira, J. N. (2006). Five new species of Acanthobothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the freshwater stingray Himantura chaophraya (Batoidea: Dasyatidae) in Malaysian Borneo. Journal of Parasitology 92, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyler, C. and Caira, J. N. (2010). Phylogenetic status of four new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) parasitic on the wedgefish Rhynchobatus laevis (Elasmobranchii: Rhynchobatidae): implications for interpreting host associations. Invertebrate Systematics 24, 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyler, C., Caira, J. N. and Jensen, K. (2009). Five new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from an unusual species of Himantura (Rajiformes: Dasyatidae) from northern Australia. Folia Parasitologica 56, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghoshroy, S. and Caira, J. N. (2001). Four new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the whiptail stingray Dasyatis brevis from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 87, 354–372.Google Scholar
Goldstein, P. Z. and DeSalle, R. (2011). Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: Determination, discovery, and description. Bioessays 33, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, T. R. (2005). DNA barcoding does not compete with taxonomy. Nature 434, 1067.Google Scholar
Healy, C. J. (2003). A revision of Platybothrium Linton, 1890 (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae), with a phylogenetic analysis and comments on host-parasite associations. Systematic Parasitology 56, 85–139.Google Scholar
Healy, C. J. (2006). Three new species of Rhinebothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the freshwater whipray, Himantura chaophraya, in Malaysian Borneo. Journal of Parasitology 92, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, C. J., Caira, J. N., Jensen, K., Webster, B. L. and Littlewood, D. T. J. (2009). Proposal for a new tapeworm order, Rhinebothriidea. International Journal for Parasitology 39, 497–511.Google Scholar
Hebert, P. D. N., Burns, J. M., Janzen, D. H. and Hallwachs, W. (2004). Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 14812–14817.Google Scholar
Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. and deWaard, J. R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biology Series B 270, 313–321.Google Scholar
Hoberg, E. P. (1999). Systematics of the Eucestoda: Advances toward a new phylogenetic paradigm, and observations on the early diversification of tapeworms and vertebrates. Systematic Parasitology 42, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, E. P., Jones, A. and Bray, R. A. (1999). Phylogenetic analysis among the families of Cyclophyllidea (Eucestoda) based on comparative morphology, with new hypotheses for co-evolution of vertebrates. Systematic Parasitology 42, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoberg, E. P., Mariaux, J., Justine, J., Brooks, D. R. and Weekes, P. J. (1997). Phylogeny of the orders of the Eucestoda (Cercomeromorphae) based on comparative morphology: Historical perspectives and a new working hypothesis. Journal of Parasitology 83, 1128–1147.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. A. (2006). Guidus n. gen. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) with description of a new species and emendation of the generic diagnosis of Marsupiobothrium. Journal of Parasitology 92, 832–840.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. A. (2009). New species of Crossobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the broadnose sevengill shark, Notorynchus cepedianus, in Argentina. Journal of Parasitology 95, 1479–1488.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. A. and Caira, J. N. (2011). Description of 3 new species of Echinobothrium (Cestodea, Diphyllidea) from Indo-Pacific elasmobranchs of the genus Glaucostegus (Rajiformes, Rhinobatidae). Journal of Parasitology in press.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. A. and Campbell, R. A. (2002). Notomegarhynchus novonae n. gen. and n. sp. (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea), from skates (Rajidae: Arhynchobatinae) in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Parasitology 88, 340–349.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. A. and Hoberg, E. P. (1999). Preliminary comments on a phylogenetic study of the order Diphyllidea van Beneden in Carus, 1863. Systematic Parasitology 42, 21–27.Google Scholar
Jansen, D. H. (2004). Now is the time. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 359, 731–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K. (2001). Four new genera and five new species of lecanicephalideans (Cestoda: Lecanicephalidea) from elasmobranchs in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 87, 845–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, K. (2005). A monograph on the Lecanicephalidea (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum 18, 1–241.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. (2006). A new species of Aberrapex Jensen, 2001 (Cestoda: Lecanicephalidea) from Taeniura lymma (Forsskål) (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae) from off Sabah, Malaysia. Systematic Parasitology 64, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, K., Nikolov, P. and Caira, J. N. (2011). A new genus and two new species of Anteroporidae (Lecanicephalidea, Cestoda) from the Darkspotted numbfish (Narcine maculata, Narcinidae, Torpediniformes) in Malaysian Borneo. Folia Parasitologica. (In press).Google Scholar
Kuchta, R. and Caira, J. N. (2010). Three new species of Echinobothrium (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from Indo-Pacific stingrays of the genus Pastinachus (Rajiformes: Dasyatidae). Folia Parasitologica 57, 185–196.Google Scholar
Kurochkin, V. B. and Slankis, A. J. (1973). [New representative and the composition of the order Litobothriidea Dailey, 1969 (Eucestoes)]. (In Russian). Parazitologiya 7, 503–507.Google Scholar
Last, P. R., Fahmi, and Naylor, G. J. P. (2010 b). Pastinachus stellurostris sp. nov., a new stingray (Elasmobranchii: Myliobatiformes) from Indonesian Borneo. In Descriptions of New Sharks and Rays from Borneo (ed. Last, P. R., White, W. T. and Pogonoski, J. J), pp. 129–139. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 032.Google Scholar
Last, P. R. and Stevens, J. D. (1994). Sharks and Rays of Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Australia.Google Scholar
Last, P. R. and Stevens, J. D. (2009). Sharks and Rays of Australia, 2nd Edn. CSIRO Publishing, Australia.Google Scholar
Last, P. R., White, W. T. and Pogonoski, J. J. (2008) Descriptions of New Australian Chondrichthyans. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 022, 358 pp.Google Scholar
Last, P. R., White, W. T. and Pogonoski, J. J. (2010 a). Descriptions of New Sharks and Rays from Borneo. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 032. 165 pp.Google Scholar
Lefébure, T., Douady, C. J., Gouy, M. and Gibert, J. (2006). Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40, 435–447.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1889). IV. Notes on Entozoa of marine fishes of New England, with descriptions of several new species. Report of the Commissioner—United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries 14, 453–511.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1890). Notes on Entozoa of marine fishes of New England, with descriptions of several new species. Part II. Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries (1887), Washington DC 15, 718–899.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1908). IX. Helminth fauna of the Dry Tortugas. I. Cestodes. Publication No. 102, Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington 1, 157–190.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1924). Notes on cestode parasites of sharks and skates. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 64, 1–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipscomb, D., Platnick, N and Wheeler, Q. (2003). The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 65–66.Google Scholar
Lohse, K. (2009). Can mtDNA barcodes be used to delimit species? A response to Pons et al. (2006). Systematic Biology 58, 439–442.Google Scholar
Mariaux, J. (1998). A molecular phylogeny of the Eucestoda. Journal of Parasitology 84, 114–124.Google Scholar
Mariaux, J. and Vaucher, C. (1994). Progress in tapeworm systematics. Parasitology Today 10, 43–44.Google Scholar
Marques, F., Brooks, D. R. and Lasso, C. A. (2001). Anindobothrium n. gen. (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea) inhabiting marine and freshwater potamotrygonid stingrays. Journal of Parasitology 87, 666–672.Google Scholar
Marques, F., Brooks, D. R. and Monks, S. (1995). Five new species of Acanthobothrium van Beneden, 1849 (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) in stingrays from the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica. Journal of Parasitology 81, 942–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, C. and Cicero, C. (2004). DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biology 2, 1529–1531.Google Scholar
Nasin, C., Caira, J. N. and Euzet, L. (1997). A revision of Callibothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) with descriptions of three new species and a cladistic analysis of the genus. Journal of Parasitology 83, 714–733.Google Scholar
Neifar, L. L., Euzet, and Ben Hassine, K. (2002). Anthobothrium altavelae sp. n. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the spiny butterfly ray Gymnura altavela (Elasmobranchii: Gymnuridae) in Tunisia. Folia Parasitologica 49, 295–298.Google Scholar
Neifar, L., Tyler, G. A. and Euzet, L. (2001). Two new species of Macrobothridium (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from rhinobatid elasmobranchs in the Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia, with notes on the status of the genus. Journal of Parasitology 87, 673–680.Google Scholar
Noever, C., Caira, J. N., Kuchta, R. and Desjardins, L. (2010). Two new species of Aporhynchus (Cestoda: Trypanorhyncha) from deep water lanternsharks (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) in the Azores, Portugal. Journal of Parasitology 96, 1176–1184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, P. D. and Caira, J. N. (1999). Evolution of the major lineages of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoidea) inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA and elongation factor-1 alpha. Journal of Parasitology 85, 1134–1159.Google Scholar
Olson, P. D. and Caira, J. N. (2001). Two new species of Litobothrium Dailey, 1969 (Cestoda: Litobothriidea) from thresher sharks in the Gulf of California, Mexico, with redescriptions of two new species in the genus. Systematic Parasitoilogy 48, 159–177.Google Scholar
Olson, P. D., Caira, J. N., Jensen, K., Overstreet, R. M., Palm, H. W. and Beveridge, I. (2010). Evolution of the trypanorhynch tapeworms: parasite phylogeny supports independent lineages of sharks and rays. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 223–242.Google Scholar
Olson, P. D., Littlewood, D. T. J., Bray, R. A. and Mariaux, J. (2001). Interrelationships and evolution of the tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19, 443–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, P. D., Ruhnke, R. T., Sanney, J. and Hudson, T. (1999). Evidence for host-specific clades of tetraphyllidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Eucestoda) revealed by analysis of 18S ssrDNA. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 1465–1476.Google Scholar
Palm, H. W. (2004). The Trypanorhyncha Diesing, 1863. PKSPL-IPB Press, Bogor.Google Scholar
Palm, H. W., Waeschenbach, A., Olson, P. D. and Littlewood, D. T. J. (2009). Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the Trypanorhyncha Diesing, 1863 (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52, 351–367.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. and Caira, J. N. (2008). Calliobothrium schneiderae n. sp. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the spotted estuary smooth-hound shark, Mustelus lenticulatus from New Zealand. Comparative Parasitology 75, 174–181.Google Scholar
Rego, A. A., de Chambrier, A., Hanzelová, V., Hoberg, E. P., Scholz, T., Weekes, P. and Zehnder, M. (1998). Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of subfamilies of the Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda). Systematic Parasitology 40, 1–19.Google Scholar
Reyda, F. B. and Caira, J. N. (2006). Five new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Himantura uarnacoides (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae) in Malaysian Borneo. Comparative Parasitology 73, 49–71.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (2010). Seventh International Acanthocephalan workshop held in Walpole, Maine, USA. Comparative Parasitology 77, 183.Google Scholar
Riser, N. W. (1955). Studies on cestode parasites of sharks and skates. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 30, 265–311.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. D. (1959 a). Some new cestodes from New Zealand marine fishes. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 86, 381–392.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. D. (1959 b). Records of cestodes from marine fishes of New Zealand. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 86, 143–153.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, N., Pickering, M. and Caira, J. N. (2011). Echinobothrium joshuai n. sp. (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from the roughnose skate, Cruriraja hulleyi, (Rajiformes: Rajidae) off South Africa. Comparative Parasitology. (In press).Google Scholar
Ruhnke, T. R., Caira, J. N. and Carpenter, S. D. (2006 b). Orectolobicestus n. g. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea), with the description of five new species and the transfer of Phyllobothrium chiloscyllii to the new genus. Systematic Parasitology 65, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhnke, T. R. and Carpenter, S. D. (2008). Two new species of Paraorygmatobothrium Ruhnke, 1994 (Tetraphyllidea: Phyllobothriidae) from the smooth-hound Mustelus mustelus (L.) and the gummy shark M. antarcticus Gunther (Carcharhiniformes: Triakidae). Systematic Parasitology 71, 213–222.Google Scholar
Ruhnke, T. R., Curran, S. S. and Holbert, T. (2000). Two new species of Duplicibothrium Williams and Campbell, 1978 (Tetraphyllidea: Serendipidae) from the Pacific cownose ray Rhinoptera steindachneri Systematic Parasitology 47, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruhnke, T. R., Healy, C. J. and Shapero, S. (2006 a). Two new species of Paraorygmatobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from weasel sharks (Carcharhiniformes: Hemigaleidae) of Australia and Borneo. Journal of Parasitology 92, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruhnke, T. R. and Thompson, V. A. (2006). Two new species of Paraorygmatobothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Phyllobothriidae) from the lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris and Negaprion acutidens (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae). Comparative Parasitology 73, 35–41.Google Scholar
Savolainen, V., Cowan, R. S., Vogler, A. P., Roderick, G. K. and Lan, R. (2005). Towards writing the encyclopedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 360, 1805–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, G. D. and Beveridge, I. (1990). Cathetocephalus australis n. sp. (Cestoidea: Cathetocephalidae) from Australia, with a proposal for Cathetocephalidea n. ord. Journal of Parasitology 76, 337–339.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. and Hornell, J. (1905). Further report on parasites found in connection with the pearl oyster fishery at Ceylon. In Report to the government of Ceylon on the pearl oyster Fisheries in the Gulf of Manaar (ed. Herdman, W.), Royal Society of London Part 3, 49–56.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. and Hornell, J. (1906). Report on the cestode and nematode parasites from the marine fishes of Ceylon. In Report to the government of Ceylon on the pearl oyster Fisheries in the Gulf of Manaar (ed. Herdman, W.), Royal Society of London Part 5, 43–96.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1911). Description of nine new species of cestode parasites, including two new genera from marine fishes of Ceylon. Ceylon Marine Biological Report 1, 216–225.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1925). A monograph on the Tetraphyllidea with notes on related cestodes. Memoirs of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (New Series) 2, 1–368.Google Scholar
Subhapradha, C. K. (1955). Cestode parasites of fishes of Madras Coast. Indian Journal of Helminthology 7, 41–132.Google Scholar
Tyler, G. A. (2001). Diphyllidean cestodes of the Gulf of California, Mexico with description of two new species of Echinobothrium (Cestoda: Diphyllidea). Journal of Parasitology 87, 172–184.Google Scholar
Tyler, G. A. (2006). Tapeworms of elasmobranchs (Part II). A monograph on the Diphyllidea (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum 20, 1–142.Google Scholar
Vasileva, G. P., Dimitrov, G. I. and Georgiev, B. B. (2002). Phyllobothrium squali Yamaguti, 1952 (Tetraphyllidea): redescription and first record in the Black Sea. Systematic Parasitology 53, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waeschenbach, A., Webster, B. L., Bray, R. A. and Littlewood, D. T. J. (2007). Added resolution among ordinal level relationships of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) with complete small and large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45, 311–325.Google Scholar
White, W. T., Last, P. R. and Naylor, G. J. P. (2010 b). Scoliodon macrorhynchos (Bleeker, 1852), a second species of spadenose shark from the Western Pacific (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae). In Descriptions of New Sharks and Rays from Borneo (ed. Last, P. R., White, W. T., Pogonoski, J. J.), pp. 61–76. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 032.Google Scholar
White, W. T., Last, P. R., Naylor, G. J. P. and Harris, M. (2010 c). Resurrection and redescription of the Borneo broadfin shark Lamiopsis tephrodes (Fowler, 1905) (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae). In Descriptions of New Sharks and Rays from Borneo (ed. Last, P. R., White, W. T., Pogonoski, J. J.), pp. 45–59. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 032.Google Scholar
White, W. T., Last, P. R., Naylor, G. J. P., Jensen, K. and Caira, J. N. (2010 a). Clarification of Aetobatus ocellatus (Kuhl, 1823) as a valid species, and a comparison with Aetobatus narinari (Euphrasen, 1790) (Rajiformes: Myliobatidae). In Descriptions of New Sharks and Rays from Borneo (ed. Last, P. R., White, W. T., Pogonoski, J. J.), pp. 141–164. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 032.Google Scholar
Williams, H. H. (1968 a). Acanthobothrium quadripartitum sp. nov. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Raja naevus in the North Sea and English Channel. Parasitology 58, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, H. H. (1968 b). Phyllobothrium piriei sp. nov. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Raja naevus with comments on its habitat and mode of attachment. Parasitology 58, 929–937.Google Scholar
Williams, H. H. and Bray, R. A. (1984). Chimaerocestos prudhoei gen. et sp. nov., representing a new family of tetraphyllideans and the first record of strobilate tapeworms from a holocephalan. Parasitology 88, 105–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojciechowska, A. (1991 a). New species of the genus Phyllobothrium (Cestoda, Tetraphyllidea) from Antarctic batoid fishes. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 36, 63–68.Google Scholar
Wojciechowska, A. (1991 b). Some tetraphyllidean and diphyllidean cestodes from Antarctic batoid fishes. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 36, 69–74.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, A., Yokoyama, H., Ogawa, K. and Taniuchi, T. (2003). Use of parasites as biological tags for separating stocks of starspotted dogfish Mustelus manazo in Japan and Taiwan. Fisheries Science 69, 337–342.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1934). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 4. Cestodes of fishes. Japanese Journal of Zoology 6, 1–112.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1952). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 49. Cestodes of fishes, II. Acta Medicinae Okayama 8, 1–76.Google Scholar