Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:04:22.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formative assessment of oncology trainees' communication with cancer patients about internet information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2013

Carma L. Bylund ,
Miryam Sperka  and
Thomas A. D'Agostino
Carma L. Bylund*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Miryam Sperka
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Thomas A. D'Agostino
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Carma Bylund, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, New York 10022. E-mail: bylundlc@mskcc.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Cancer patients and their caregivers often turn to the internet for information and support following a cancer diagnosis. Research shows a need for improvement in doctors' communication with patients about internet information. The purpose of this formative assessment was to evaluate oncology trainees' skills in talking about internet information with cancer patients.

Methods:

Thirty-nine oncology trainees were evaluated in a baseline standardized patient assessment as part of their participation in the Comskil Training Program. As part of the assessment, standardized patients were instructed to raise the topic of internet information they had read. Transcriptions of the video-recorded assessments were coded for patient statements and trainee responses.

Results:

Fifty-six percent of trainees used a probe to get more information before addressing the content of the internet search, while 18% addressed it immediately. Eighteen percent of trainees warned the patient about using the internet, and 8% warned about and also encouraged internet use. Thirteen percent of trainees praised the patient for seeking out information on the internet.

Significance of results:

This formative assessment indicated that the majority of trainees addressed the content of the internet search, while a minority addressed the internet as a tool and praised patients' efforts. Research in this area should examine the effectiveness of educational interventions for trainees to improve discussions about internet information.

Keywords

Doctor–patient communicationInternetCancer communication
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 197 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basch, E., Thaler, H., Shi, W., et al. (2004). Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions. Cancer, 100, 2476–2483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, A. (2005). Medical specialists' accounts of the impact of the internet on the doctor/patient relationship. Health, 9(3), 319–338.Google Scholar
Bylund, C.L., Gueguen, J., Sabee, C., et al. (2007 a). Provider–patient dialogue about internet information: An exploration of strategies to improve the provider–patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 66, 346–352.Google Scholar
Bylund, C.L., Sabee, C.M., Imes, R.S., et al. (2007 b). Exploration of the construct of reliance among patients who talk with their providers about internet information. Journal of Health Communication, 12(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bylund, C.L., Gueguen, J.A., D'Agostino, T.A., et al. (2010). Doctor–patient communication about cancer-related internet information. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 28(127–142), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bylund, C.L., Brown, R.F., Bialer, P.A., et al. (2011). Developing and implementing an advanced communication training program in oncology at a comprehensive cancer center. Journal of Cancer Education, 26, 604–611.Google Scholar
Diaz, J.A., Sciamanna, C.N., Evangelou, E., et al. (2005). Brief report: What types of internet guidance do patients want from their physicians? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(8), 683–685.Google Scholar
Fogel, J., Albert, S.M., Schnabel, F., et al. (2002). Use of the internet by women with breast cancer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2), e9.Google Scholar
Helft, P.R., Hlubocky, F. & Daugherty, C.K. (2003). American oncologists' views of internet use by cancer patients: A mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(5), 942–947.Google Scholar
Levinson, W., Gorawara-Bhat, R. & Lamb, J. (2000). A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(8), 1021–1027.Google Scholar
Makoul, G. (1998). Perpetuating passivity: Reliance and reciprocal determinism in physician–patient interaction. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 233–259.Google ScholarPubMed
Metz, J., Devine, P., De Nittis, A., et al. (2003). A multi-institutional study of internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology – Biology – Physics, 56(4), 1201–1205.Google Scholar
Monnier, J., Laken, M. & Carter, C. (2002). Patient and caregiver interest in internet-based cancer services. Cancer Practice, 10(6), 305–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranson, S., Morrow, G., Dakhil, S., et al. (2003). Internet use among 1020 cancer patients assessed in community practices: A URCC CCOP study. Proceedings/Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 22, 534.Google Scholar