Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:05:50.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Timeless characters: a response to Vermeij (1999)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Daniel L. Geiger ,
Kirk Fitzhugh  and
Christine E. Thacker
Daniel L. Geiger
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007. E-mail: dgeiger@nhm.org
Kirk Fitzhugh
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007. E-mail: kfitzhug@nhm.org
Christine E. Thacker
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007. E-mail: thacker@nhm.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of geologic age or range data in phylogenetic reconstruction is strongly debated (Cracraft and Eldredge 1979; Smith 1994; Fox et al. 1999; Heyning and Thacker 1999). Vermeij (1999) voiced concern regarding ‘rectangular data matrices’ and concluded that stratigraphic data are particularly suitable for improving phylogenetic inference. We find two major problems with his conclusion and question the validity of stratocladistics or any other phylogenetic method incorporating temporal data (e.g., Wagner 1998).

Type
Comment and Reply
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Winter 2001 , pp. 177 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cracraft, J., and Eldredge, N. 1979. Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. L., Fisher, D. C., and Leighton, L. R. 1999. Reconstructing phylogeny with and without temporal data. Science 284:1816–1819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyning, J. E., and Thacker, C. E. 1999. Phylogenies, temporal evidence, and negative evidence. Science 285:1179a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahner, M., and Bunge, M. 1997. Foundations of biophilosophy. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D. H. 1998. Real time II. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1983. Realism and the aim of science. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record: documenting evolutionary patterns. Blackwell Scientific, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1999. A serious matter with character-taxon matrices. Paleobiology 25:431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P. J. 1995. Stratigraphic tests of cladistic hypotheses. Paleobiology 21:153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P. J. 1998. A likelihood approach for evaluating estimates of phylogenetic relationships among fossil taxa. Paleobiology 24:430–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar