Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T17:54:40.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temporal patterns of barren intervals in the Phanerozoic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Andrew B. Smith  and
A. J. McGowan
Andrew B. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: a.smith@nhm.ac.uk
A. J. McGowan
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: a.smith@nhm.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has recently been argued that barren intervals of marine sedimentary rock are less common in the Cenozoic than in the Paleozoic, and that this arises as a direct consequence of widespread epeiric seas and the prevalence of dysaerobic conditions at such times. We show, using an independent and more direct measure of rock outcrop through time in western Europe, that barren marine sedimentary rocks do become less frequent toward the present, but that this is not linked to any epeiric-seas effect. The proportion of barren to fossiliferous rock outcrop correlates well with the inferred Phanerozoic marine diversity curve (although more so in the Paleozoic than in the post-Paleozoic), and shows no correlation or only a weak negative correlation with area over which the sediments have been deposited. We therefore concluded that the Phanerozoic trend in fossiliferousness most likely records the degree to which space is occupied in the shallow marine realm.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , Winter 2008 , pp. 155 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boesch, D. F., and Rabalais, N. N. 1991. Effects on continental shelf benthos: comparisons between the New York Bight and the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Pp. 27–33in Tyson, and Pearson, 1991b.Google Scholar
Crampton, J. S., Foote, M., Beau, A. G., Maxwell, P. A., Cooper, R. A., Matcham, I., Marshall, B. A., and Jones, C. M. 2006. The ark was full! Constant to declining Cenozoic shallow marine biodiversity on an isolated midlatitude continent. Paleobiology 32:509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. G. 1984. The two Phanerozoic supercycles. Pp. 129–150in Berggren, W. A. and Van Couvering, J. A., eds. Catastrophes and earth history. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, A. S. 2000. The Cretaceous world. Pp. 4–19in Culver, S. J. and Rawson, P. F., eds. Biotic response to global change: the last 145 million years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, A. S., Smith, A. B., Monks, N. E. A., Young, J. A., Howard, A., Wray, D. S., and Huggett, J. M. 2000. Marine biodiversity through the late Cenomanian-Early Turonian: palaeoceanographic controls and sequence stratigraphic biases. Journal of the Geological Society, London 157:745–757.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., and Smith, A. G. 2004. A geologic time scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A., and Wignall, P. B. 1997. Mass extinctions and their aftermath. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Martin, R. 2003. The fossil record of biodiversity: nutrients, productivity, habitat area and differential preservation. Lethaia 36:179–193.Google Scholar
McGowan, A. J., and Smith, A. B. 2008. Are global Phanerozoic marine diversity curves truly global? A study of the relationship between regional rock records and global Phanerozoic marine diversity. Paleobiology (this issue)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, S. 2007. The problem with the Paleozoic. Paleobiology 33:165–181.Google Scholar
Peters, S., and Foote, M. 2001. Biodiversity in the Phanerozoic: a reinterpretation. Paleobiology 27:583–601.Google Scholar
Savrda, C. E., and Bottjer, D. J. 1991. Oxygen-related biofacies in marine strata: an overview and update. Pp. 201–219in Tyson, and Pearson, 1991b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, P., ed. 2003. The Cretaceous world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 2007. Phanerozoic marine diversity: problems and prospects. Journal of the Geological Society, London 164:731–745.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B., and McGowan, A. J. 2007. The shape of the Phanerozoic marine palaeodiversity curve: how much can be predicted from the sedimentary rock record of western Europe? Palaeontology 50:765–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, R. V., and Pearson, T. H. 1991a. Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia: an overview. Pp. 1–24in Tyson, and Pearson, 1991b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, R. V., and Pearson, T. H. 1991b. Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia. Geological Society of London Special Publication 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. J., Willis, K. J., and Field, R. 2003. Climatic-energetic explanations of diversity: a macroscopic perspective. Pp. 107–129in Blackburn, T. M. and Gaston, K. J., eds. Macroecology concepts and consequences. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wignall, P. B. 1994. Black shales. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilby, P. R., Hudson, J. D., Clements, R. G., and Hollingwoth, N. T. J. 2004. Taphonomy and origin of an accumulate of soft-bodied coleoid cephalopods in the Oxford Clay Formation (Jurassic, England). Palaeontology 47:1159–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. H., Currie, D. J., and Maurer, B. 1993. Energy supply and patterns of species richness on local and regional scales. Pp. 66–74in Ricklefs, R. E. and Schluter, D., eds. Species diversity in ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar