Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:32:08.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

David M. Raup
David M. Raup*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, N. Y. 14627
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Benthic ecologists have successfully applied rarefaction techniques to the problem of compensating for the effect of sample size on apparent species diversity (= species richness). The same method can be used in studies of diversity at higher taxonomic levels (families and orders) in the fossil record where samples represent world-wide distributions of species or genera over long periods of geologic time.

Application of rarefaction to several large samples of post-Paleozoic echinoids (totaling 7,911 species) confirms the utility of the method. Rarefaction shows that the observed increase in the number of echinoid families since the Paleozoic is real in the sense that it cannot be explained solely by the increase in numbers of preserved species. There has been no statistically significant increase in the number of families since mid-Cretaceous, however. At the order level, echinoid diversity may have been nearly constant since late Triassic or early Jurassic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Fall 1975 , pp. 333 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Berggren, W. A. 1972. A Cenozoic time-scale—some implications for regional geology and paleobiogeography. Lethaia. 5:195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braziunas, T. F. 1975. A geological duration chart. Geology. 3:342–343.Google Scholar
Fager, E. W. 1972. Diversity: a sampling study. Am. Nat. 106:293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B., Smith, A. G., and Wilcock, B., eds. 1964. The Phanerozoic Time-scale. 458 pp. Geol. Soc. Lond.; London.Google Scholar
Heck, K. L. Jr., Van Belle, G., and Simberloff, D. S. 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology. Submitted.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology. 52:577–586.Google Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1974. Evolutionary trends and their functional significance in the post-Paleozoic echinoids. Paleontol. Soc. Mem. 5. J. Paleontol. 48(suppl. to no. 3):1–95.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. and Thiery, P. 1909–1925. Essai de nomenclature raisonnee des Echinides. 607 pp. Chaumont, France.Google Scholar
Lambert, R. St. J. 1971. The pre-Pleistocene Phanerozoic time-scale—a review. pp. 9–31. In: Harland, W. B. and Francis, E. H., eds. The Phanerozoic Time-scale, A Supplement (Part 1). Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 5.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., ed. 1966. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3. 695 pp. Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kans. Press.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science. 177:1065–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohr, D. M. and Boucot, A. J. 1974. Evolutionary patterns in the Paleozoic Bivalvia: documentation and some theoretical considerations: discussion. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 85:665–666.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1968. Marinebenthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102:243–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. S. 1972. Properties of the rarefaction diversity measurement. Am. Nat. 106:414–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. S. 1974. Permo-Triassic extinctions: effects of area on biotic equilibrium. J. Geol. 82:267–274.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. J. Jr. and Evans, I. 1972. Community structure and sampling requirement in paleoecology. J. Paleontol. 46:845–858.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1973. Evolutionary Paleoecology of the Marine Biosphere. 511 pp. Prentice-Hall. Inc.; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar