Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:40:10.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the continuity of background and mass extinction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Steve C. Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Abstract

Do mass extinctions grade continuously into the background extinctions occurring throughout the history of life, or are they a fundamentally distinct phenomenon that cannot be explained by processes responsible for background extinction? Various criteria have been proposed for addressing this question, including approaches based on physical mechanisms, ecological selectivity, and statistical characterizations of extinction intensities.

Here I propose a framework defining three types of continuity of mass and background extinctions—continuity of cause, continuity of effect, and continuity of magnitude. I test the third type of continuity with a statistical method based on kernel density estimation. Previous statistical approaches typically have examined quantitative characteristics of mass extinctions (such as metrics of extinction intensity) and compared them with the distribution of such characteristics associated with background extinctions. If mass extinctions are outliers, or are separated by a gap from background extinctions, the distinctness of mass extinctions is supported.

In this paper I apply Silverman's Critical Bandwidth Test to test for the continuity of mass extinctions by applying kernel density estimation and bootstrap modality testing. The method improves on existing work based on searching for gaps in histograms, in that it does not depend on arbitrary choices of parameters (such as bin widths for histograms), and provides a direct estimate of the significance of continuities or gaps in observed extinction intensities. I am thus able to test rigorously whether differences between mass extinctions and background extinctions are statistically significant.

I apply the methodology to Sepkoski's database of Phanerozoic marine genera. I conclude that mass and background extinctions appear to be continuous at this third level—continuity of magnitude—even though evidence suggests that they are discontinuous at the first and second levels.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V. 1980. Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science 208:10951108.Google Scholar
Anstey, R. L. 1986. Bryozoan provinces and patterns of generic evolution and extinction in the late Ordovician of North America. Lethaia 19:3351.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K., and Gilinsky, N. L. 1986. Perspectives on the distribution of origination and extinction during the Phanerozoic. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 18:534.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K., and Knoll, A. H. 2001. Is there a separate class of “mass” extinctions? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 33:A-141.Google Scholar
Becker, L., Poreda, R. J., Hunt, A. G., Bunch, T. E., and Rampino, M. 2001. Impact event at the Permian-Triassic boundary: evidence from extraterrestrial noble gases in fullerenes. Science 291:15301533.Google Scholar
Boyajian, G. E. 1991. Taxon age and selectivity of extinction. Paleobiology 17:4957.Google Scholar
Briggs, J. C. 1998. Biotic replacements: extinction or clade interaction? BioScience 48:389395.Google Scholar
Efron, B. W., and Tibshirani, R. J. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1989. Regional paleoecology of Permian gastropod genera, southwestern United States and the end-Permian mass extinction. Palaios 4:424–38.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1990. Carboniferous-Triassic gastropod diversity patterns and the Permo-Triassic mass extinction. Paleobiology 16:187203.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 1994. Temporal variation in extinction risk and temporal scaling of extinction metrics. Paleobiology 20:424444.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L. 1994. Volatility and the Phanerozoic decline of background extinction intensity. Paleobiology 20:445458.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1985. The paradox of the first tier: an agenda for paleobiology. Paleobiology 11:212.Google Scholar
Hunt, G., and Chapman, R. E. 2001. Evaluating hypotheses of instar-grouping in arthropods: a maximum likelihood approach. Paleobiology 27:466484.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1986. Background and mass extinctions: the alternation of macroevolutionary regimes. Science 231:129133.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1989. The biology of mass extinction: a paleontological view. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 325:357368.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2001. Lessons from the past: evolutionary impacts of mass extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:53935398.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Raup, D. M. 1995. Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. Science 268:389391.Google Scholar
Johansen, M. B. 1989. Background extinction and mass extinction of the brachiopods from the chalk of northwest Europe. Palaios 4:243250.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1987. Taxonomic selectivity and continuous variation in mass and background extinctions of marine taxa. Nature 325:143145.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1998. Biotic transitions in global marine diversity. Science 281:11571160.Google Scholar
Monchot, H., and Léchelle, J. 2002. Statistical nonparametric methods for the study of fossil populations. Paleobiology 28:5569.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. J., and Eble, G. J. 1999. Decline in extinction rates and scale invariance in the fossil record. Paleobiology 25:434439.Google Scholar
Olsen, P. E., Kent, D. V., Sues, H.-D., Koeberl, C., Huber, H., Montanari, A., Rainforth, E. C., Fowell, S. J., Szajna, M. J., and Hartline, B. W. 2002. Ascent of dinosaurs linked to an Iridium anomaly at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. Science 296:13051307.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. F. 1983. Mass extinctions in the fossil record. Science 219:12391240.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1986. Biological extinction in earth history. Science 231:15281533.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1991a. A kill curve for Phanerozoic marine species. Paleobiology 17:3748.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1991b. Extinction: bad genes or bad luck? Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1994. The role of extinction in evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91:67586763.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Boyajian, G. E. 1988. Patterns of generic extinction in the fossil record. Paleobiology 14:109125.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215:15011503.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W. 1981. Using kernel density estimates to investigate multimodality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 43:9799.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1987. Extinction. Scientific American Books, New York.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. 1987. Testing hypotheses or fitting models? Another look at mass extinctions. Pp. 147159in Nitecki, M. H. and Hoffman, A., eds. Neutral models in biology. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Thackeray, J. F. 1990. Rates of extinction in marine invertebrates: further comparison between background and mass extinction. Paleobiology 16:2224.Google Scholar
Webster, M. 2001. Intraspecific variation and morphological evolution in the early Cambrian trilobite Bristolia (Olenello-idea). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 33:A-31.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R. 1989. Macroevolutionary implication of mass extinction: evidence from an upper Cambrian stage boundary. Paleobiology 15:4652.Google Scholar