Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:29:09.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Duration and habitat of fossil taxa: changes through time in variance and taxonomic selectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Eric W. Holman
Eric W. Holman*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095. E-mail: holman@psych.ucla.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variance and taxonomic selectivity were studied as functions of time across the Phanerozoic for duration of genera and families in the fossil record and for habitat of fossil families. The variance of duration increases temporarily before mass extinctions but otherwise decreases across the Phanerozoic, and the variance of habitat increases to an asymptote. For both duration and habitat, the percentage of variance explained by differences among orders and classes shows no temporal trend, whereas the percentage of variance explained by differences among phyla decreases across the Phanerozoic. The latter decrease depends upon the time elapsed since the origination of classes within phyla in the early Paleozoic; a similar decrease appears in differences among classes if the analysis is restricted to orders that originate before the Silurian. The observed patterns can be described by bounded random walks that include some infrequent but large steps.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Spring 1999 , pp. 239 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alroy, J. 1998. Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Science 280: 731–734.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1983. Ecospace utilization and guilds in marine communities through the Phanerozoic. Pp. 719–746. in Tevesz, and McCall, 1983.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. ed. 1993. The fossil record 2. Chapman and Hall London.Google Scholar
Bonner, J. T. 1988. The evolution of complexity. Princeton University Press Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Crick, R. E. 1981. Diversity and evolutionary rates of Cambro-Ordovician nautiloids. Paleobiology 7: 216–227.Google Scholar
Erwin, D., Valentine, J. W., and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1987. A comparative study of diversification events: the early Paleozoic versus the Mesozoic. Evolution 41: 1177–1186.Google Scholar
Feller, W. 1968. An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. I, 3d ed.Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 1997. The evolution of morphological diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 129–152.Google Scholar
Foote, M. and Raup, D. M. 1996. Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa. Paleobiology 22: 121–140.Google Scholar
Gaston, K. J. 1998. Species-range size distributions: products of speciation extinction, and transformation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353: 219–230.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L. 1994. Volatility and the Phanerozoic decline of background extinction intensity. Paleobiology 20: 445–458.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1988. Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution. Journal of Paleontology 62: 319–329.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Armstrong, R. L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L. E., Smith, A. G., and Smith, D. G. 1990. A geologic time scale 1989. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holman, E. W. 1989. Some evolutionary correlates of higher taxa. Paleobiology 15: 357–363.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1987. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of Cretaceous mollusks. Science 238: 360–363.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. and Bottjer, D. J. 1983. Soft-bodied epifaunal suspension-feeding assemblages in the Late Cretaceous: implications for the evolution of benthic paleocommunities. Pp. 747–812. in Tevesz, and McCall, 1983.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1990. Classifying and analysing evolutionary trends. Pp. 28–58. in McNamara, K. J. ed. Evolutionary trends. University of Arizona Press Tucson.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1995. Extinction selectivity among lower taxa: gradational patterns and rarefaction error in extinction estimates. Paleobiology 21: 300–313.Google Scholar
McShea, D. W. 1996. Mechanisms of large-scale evolutionary trends. Evolution 48: 1747–1763.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Boyajian, G. E. 1988. Patterns of generic extinction in the fossil record. Paleobiology 14: 109–125.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Gould, S. J. 1975. Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology—towards a nomothetic paleontology. Systematic Zoology 23: 305–322.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Marshall, L. G. 1980. Variation between groups in evolutionary rates: a statistical test of significance. Paleobiology 6: 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215: 1501–1503.Google Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M., Raup, D. M., Gould, S. J., and Simberloff, D. S. 1975. Genomic versus morphologic rates of evolution: influence of morphologic complexity. Paleobiology 1: 63–70.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1975. Stratigraphic biases in the analysis of taxonomic survivorship. Paleobiology 1: 343–355.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1986. Phanerozoic overview of mass extinctions. Pp. 277–295. in Raup, D. M., Jablonski, D. eds. Patterns and processes in the history of life. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1989. Periodicity in extinction and the problem of catastrophism in the history of life. Journal of the Geological Society of London 146: 7–19.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1992. A compendium of fossil marine animal families, 2nd ed.Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology 83.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. and Miller, A. I. 1985. Evolutionary faunas and the distribution of Paleozoic marine communities in space and time. Pp. 153–190. in Valentine, J. W. ed. Phanerozoic diversity patterns: profiles in macroevolution. Princeton University Press Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. and Sheehan, P. M. 1983. Diversification, faunal change, and community replacement during the Ordovician radiations. Pp. 673–717. in Tevesz, and McCall, 1983.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1990. The general correlation between rate of speciation and rate of extinction: fortuitous causal linkages. Pp. 103–127. in Ross, R. M., Allmon, W. D. eds. Causes of evolution: a paleontological perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L. eds. 1983. Biotic interactions in fossil and Recent communities. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1969. Patterns of taxonomic and ecological structure of the shelf benthos during Phanerozoic time. Palaeontology 12: 684–709.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W., Collins, A. G., and Meyer, C. P. 1994. Morphological complexity increase in metazoans. Paleobiology 20: 131–142.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1: 1–30.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1979. Taxonomic survivorship curves. Evolutionary Theory 4: 129–142.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1984. A resetting of Phanerozoic community evolution. Nature 307: 50–52.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Signor, P. W.III. 1983. Evolutionary tempo in Jurassic and Cretaceous ammonites. Paleobiology 9: 183–198.Google Scholar