Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-489z4 Total loading time: 0.313 Render date: 2022-05-24T15:20:17.990Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Article contents

Jaw geometry and molar morphology in marsupial carnivores: analysis of a constraint and its macroevolutionary consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Lars Werdelin*
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeozoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, S–104 05 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

In both jaw geometry and molar morphology, eutherian carnivores (order Carnivora) as a whole display greater diversity (plasticity in evolution from the primitive type) than marsupial carnivores (order Dasyurida). This is related to the difference in tooth replacement between the two taxa. In Carnivora, the permanent carnassial is preceded by a deciduous carnassial; the permanent tooth can erupt in its (geometrically) permanent position, and the post-carnassial molars are free to evolve for specialized functions or be reduced. In Dasyurida, there is relative molar progression, each erupting molar in turn functioning as a carnassial, and subsequently being pushed forwards in the jaw by the next erupting molar. Thus, all molars have carnassiform morphology, and none are free to develop for other functions. The greater plasticity of Carnivora has led to their adaptive zone being broader (as a group they are relatively more eurytopic than Dasyurida), which in turn has led to greater taxonomic diversity within Carnivora than Dasyurida. The resulting pattern from a macroevolutionary point of view is that, even in the absence of direct competition, Carnivora have had greater evolutionary “success” than Dasyurida.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, M. 1974. New information about the Quaternary distribution of the Thylacine (Marsupialia, Thylacinidae) in Australia. J. Proc. R. Soc. West. Aust. 57:4350.Google Scholar
Archer, M. 1976. The dasyurid dentition and its relationships to that of didelphids, thylacinids, borhyaenids (Marsupicarnivora) and peramelids (Peramelina, Marsupialia). Aust. J. Zool., Suppl. Ser. 39:134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, M. 1978. The nature of the molar-premolar boundary in marsupials and a reinterpretation of the homology of marsupial cheekteeth. Mem. Qd. Mus. 18:157164.Google Scholar
Archer, M. 1982. A review of Miocene thylacinids (Thylacinidae, Marsupialia), the phylogenetic position of the Thylacinidae and the problem of apriorisms in character analysis. Pp. 445476. In: Archer, M., ed. Carnivorous Marsupials. Royal Society of New Souh Wales; Sydney.Google ScholarPubMed
Archer, M. 1984. The Australian marsupial radiation. In: Archer, M. and Clayton, G., eds. Vertebrate Zoogeography and Evolution in Australasia. Hesperian Press; Carlisle, Western Australia.Google Scholar
Aulerich, R. J. and Swindler, D. R. 1968. The dentition of the mink (Mustela vison). J. Mammal. 49:488494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, P. M. 1946. The evolution of carnassial dentitions in the mammals. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 116:198220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, G. B. and Hill, J. E. 1980. A World List of Mammalian Species. 226 pp. British Museum (Natural History); London.Google Scholar
Davis, D. D. 1955. Masticatory apparatus in the spectacled bear Tremarctos ornatus. Fieldiana, Zool. 37:2546.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1985. Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. 237 pp. Oxford University Press; New York.Google Scholar
Emerson, S. B. and Radinsky, L. B. 1980. Functional analysis of sabertooth cranial morphology. Paleobiology. 6:295312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, W. H. 1867. On the development and succession of the teeth in the Marsupialia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 157:631642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorniak, G. and Gans, C. 1980. Quantitative assay of electromyograms during mastication in domestic cats (Felis catus). J. Morph. 163:253281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. 1982. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology. 8:415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, W. S. 1978. The jaw lever system in ungulates: a new model. J. Zool. 184:271285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, W. S. 1982. A mechanical limitation on the position of the jaw muscles of mammals: the one-third rule. J. Mammal. 63:261266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, W. S. 1983. A functional analysis of carnassial biting. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. Lond. 20:353363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, W. S. 1985. The generalized carnivore jaw. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. London. 85:267274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiler, E. R. and Heddle, R. W. L. 1974. The eruption and growth of teeth in the Tasmanian Devil, Sarcophilus harrisii (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 108:137140.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. 1839. Treatise on the natural history and diseases of the human teeth, explaining their structure, use, formation, growth and diseases. Haswell, Barrington, and Haswell; Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1985. Functional morphology of the shell in platycope ostracodes—a study of arrested evolution. Lethaia. 18:7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L. G. 1976a. Evolution of the South American fossil marsupial family Thylacosmilidae, fossil marsupial “sabertooths” of South America. PaleoBios. 23:130.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. G. 1976b. Notes on the deciduous dentition of the Borhyaenidae (Marsupialia: Borhyaenoidea). J. Mammal. 57:751754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L. G. 1978. Evolution of the Borhyaenidae, extinct South American predaceous marsupials. Univ. Calif. Pubis. Geol. Sci. 117:189.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. G., Webb, S. D., Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Raup, D. M. 1982. Mammalian evolution and the great American interchange. Science. 215:13511357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, M. C. 1975. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia. Pp. 2146. In: Luckett, W. P. and Szalay, F. S., eds. Phylogeny of the Primates. Plenum; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radinsky, L. B. 1981. Evolution of skull shape in carnivores. 1. Representative modern carnivores. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. Lond. 15:369388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosevear, D. R. 1974. The Carnivores of West Africa. 548 pp. British Museum (Natural History); London.Google Scholar
Sanson, G. D. 1982. Evolution of feeding adaptations in fossil and Recent macropodids. Pp. 489506. In: Rich, P. V. and Thompson, E. M., eds. The Fossil Vertebrate Record of Australasia. Monash University Printing Unit; Clayton, Victoria.Google Scholar
Sanson, G. D. and Miller, W. A. 1979. Mechanism of molar progression in macropods. Anat. Rec. 193:674.Google Scholar
Slaughter, B. H., Pine, R. H., and Pine, N. E. 1974. Eruption of cheek teeth in Insectivora and Carnivora. J. Mammal. 55:115125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72:646650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. 332 pp. W. H. Freeman; San Francisco.Google Scholar
Szalay, F. S. 1982. A new appraisal of marsupial phylogeny and classification. Pp. 621640. In: Archer, M., ed. Carnivorous Marsupials. Royal Society of New South Wales; Sydney.Google Scholar
Turnbull, W. D. 1970. Mammalian masticatory apparatus. Fieldiana, Geol. 18:149356.Google Scholar
Vrba, E. S. 1980. Evolution, species and fossils: how does life evolve? S. Afr. J. Sci. 76:6184.Google Scholar
Vrba, E. S. 1983. Macroevolutionary trends: new perspectives on the roles of adaptation and incidental effect. Science. 221:387389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrba, E. S. 1984. Evolutionary pattern and process in the sister-group Alcelaphini-Aepycerotini (Mammalia: Bovidae). Pp. 6279. In: Eldredge, N. and Stanley, S. M., eds. Living Fossils. Springer-Verlag; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrba, E. S. and Eldredge, N. 1984. Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology. 10:146171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrba, E. S. and Gould, S. J. 1986. The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology. 12:217228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijs, W. A. and Dantuma, R. 1981. Functional anatomy of the masticatory apparatus in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.). Neth. J. Zool. 31:99147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werdelin, L. 1986. Comparison of skull shape in marsupial and placental carnivores. Aust. J. Zool. 34:109117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Jaw geometry and molar morphology in marsupial carnivores: analysis of a constraint and its macroevolutionary consequences
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Jaw geometry and molar morphology in marsupial carnivores: analysis of a constraint and its macroevolutionary consequences
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Jaw geometry and molar morphology in marsupial carnivores: analysis of a constraint and its macroevolutionary consequences
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *