Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-mdtzd Total loading time: 0.457 Render date: 2021-10-22T03:12:48.525Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Using GPS tracking for fruit bat conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2021

Isabella Mandl*
Affiliation:
Dahari, Mutsamudu-Anjouan, Comoros
Amelaid Houmadi
Affiliation:
Dahari, Mutsamudu-Anjouan, Comoros
Ishaka Said
Affiliation:
Dahari, Mutsamudu-Anjouan, Comoros
Badrane Ben Ali Abdou
Affiliation:
Dahari, Mutsamudu-Anjouan, Comoros
Abdoul-Kader Fardane
Affiliation:
Dahari, Mutsamudu-Anjouan, Comoros
Kilian Egger-Peitler
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Ryszard Oleksy
Affiliation:
Ecosystem Restoration Alliance, Mauritius
Hugh Doulton
Affiliation:
Dahari, Mutsamudu-Anjouan, Comoros
Sourette Said Ali Chaihane
Affiliation:
Université des Comores, Patsy-Anjouan, Comoros
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail isabella.mandl@daharicomores.org
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the ecology of species is key to the development of effective conservation measures. For many fruit bat species, however, even baseline knowledge of ecology and behaviour is lacking. To identify feeding sites of the Critically Endangered Livingstone's flying fox Pteropus livingstonii on the island of Anjouan, Comoros, we piloted the use of GPS loggers. Two bats (one female, one male) were tagged in early 2019, and data collected for 217 and 35 days, respectively. Acceleration data facilitated the classification of location points into behavioural categories. Potential feeding sites were located by cluster analysis of all location points that were attributed to a behavioural category in which feeding could occur. One important feeding site was located in an agricultural area. This is the first time quantitative behavioural data have been collected for Livingstone's flying foxes, providing insight into the ecological needs of this threatened species. These findings have the potential to inform applied conservation management decisions for protecting the resources required for the survival of this species.

Type
Short Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

With a total population of c. 1,200 individuals endemic to two islands of the Comoros archipelago, Western Indian Ocean, Livingstone's flying fox Pteropus livingstonii is categorized as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List (Sewall et al., Reference Sewall, Young, Trewhella, Rodríguez-Clark and Granek2016). This fruit bat is primarily threatened by habitat loss (Trewhella et al., Reference Trewhella, Rodriguez-Clark, Davies, Reason and Wray2001; Granek, Reference Granek2002; Daniel et al., Reference Daniel, Green, Doulton, Salim, Said and Hudson2017), as timber extraction and unsustainable agricultural practices have led to an 80% decrease in forest cover since 1995 (Boussougou et al., Reference Boussougou, Brou, Mohamed, Baazaoui, Claramunt and Haddad2015; Doulton et al., Reference Doulton, Mohamed, Shepherd, Mohamed, Ali, Maddison, Sarre and Lapstun2015). The local NGO Dahari currently works to protect the species’ 15 known roost sites on Anjouan (Dahari, 2018). We piloted the use of GPS loggers on this bat species to evaluate the applicability of this method for identifying feeding sites and thus improving conservation measures.

Two Livingstone's flying foxes were captured in early 2019 (Fig. 1, Table 1), during 19.00–21.00 using custom-made canopy nets (length × height = 7 × 3 m, mesh size: 10 × 10 cm) mounted 7 m above the ground. The nets were monitored continuously, and captured bats were removed immediately. For each bat we recorded standard measurements (forearm, wing and body length, weight, and reproductive status according to Racey, Reference Racey, Kunz and Parsons2009; Table 1). We fitted GPS loggers (15 g Bird Solar, e-obs, Grünwald, Germany) mounted on collars (handmade, including a weak link allowing the collar to fall off after a maximum of 10 months). Together the GPS logger and collar weighed 20 g, not exceeding the recommended 5% of animal body weight (Aldridge & Brigham, Reference Aldridge and Brigham1988). The loggers were set to record one location every 90 seconds when moving and one location every 6 hours when stationary. Internal accelerometers recorded movement across three axes in bursts of 4 seconds per minute. Data were retrieved at roost sites by remote download via UHF.

Fig. 1 Anjouan island in the Comoros archipelago, Western Indian Ocean, showing the 15 known long-term roost sites of Pteropus livingstonii and the site where the two individuals were captured. The dashed rectangle indicates the area covered by Fig. 3.

Table 1 Capture information and GPS data for two Pteropus livingstonii tagged with GPS loggers on Anjouan, Comoros.

1Based on data for 26 Jan.–14 Feb. 2019; the remaining dates were excluded from path length analysis as the tag lost battery power and subsequently did not record GPS points consistently.

Home ranges were computed as 95% kernel density estimates in R 3.6 (R Core Team, 2019), using the package ctmm (Calabrese et al., Reference Calabrese, Fleming and Gurarie2016). Accelerometer data facilitated an approximate classification of behavioural categories based on the orientations and oscillations of the three axes in the Movebank Acceleration Viewer (Wikelski & Kays, Reference Wikelski and Kays2019): resting (the animal is stationary, head downwards), flying (the animal is moving across the landscape, head parallel to ground), scratching (the animal is stationary, head downwards, using its leg to scratch its fur) and moving/climbing (the animal is changing position within a tree, head position is variable; Fig. 2). These categories were based on Weber et al. (Reference Weber, Duengkae, Fahr, Dechmann, Phensakul and Khumbucha2015) and O'Mara et al. (Reference O'Mara, Scharf, Fahr, Abedi-Lartey, Wikelski, Dechmann and Safi2019), and preliminary behavioural observation of the study individuals: we observed the two collared individuals for 15 minutes after release, noting behaviours continuously until the bats were out of sight. These behaviours were matched with the acceleration data for the time of observation. The remaining acceleration data, and all corresponding location points, were subsequently classed into the behavioural categories. The data were additionally validated by visualization of location using QGIS 2.18 (QGIS Development Team, 2019); for example, flying behaviours only occur along a flight path.

Fig. 2 Screenshot of the Movebank Acceleration Viewer (Wikelski & Kays, Reference Wikelski and Kays2019), showing, from top to bottom, the oscillations along the z, x and y axes recorded by the GPS loggers. The acceleration data were used to distinguish between behavioural categories (resting, scratching, flying and moving/climbing).

The GPS loggers recorded data for 217 and 35 days for the female and the male, respectively. Both individuals covered a mean area of 13.1 ± SD 1.7 km2 and frequented 5–8 known roost sites within the observation period (Fig. 3a). For details of path lengths and home range sizes, see Table 1.

Fig. 3 Movement data of two individual P. livingstonii on Anjouan (Fig. 1) were used to estimate 95% kernel density ranges, presented as low likelihood, high optimal, and maximum likelihood bandwidth home range areas (a), and polygons depicting potential feeding areas (b). Roost sites are named according to the nearest villages. The arrow indicates the area where flying fox feeding behaviour was ground-truthed.

In the complete dataset 4,086 (female) and 1,557 (male) location points were attributed to moving/climbing. As only baseline behaviours could be determined, moving/climbing behaviour probably included translocation within the same tree as well as feeding. All points categorized as moving/climbing were therefore treated as potential feeding sites. We conducted a cluster analysis of these points, grouping them based on distance, with the R package geosphere (Hijmans, Reference Hijmans2019). We computed 100% minimum convex polygons for each of the clusters using the R package adehabitatHR (Calenge, Reference Calenge2006), illustrating potential feeding areas (Fig. 3b, Table 1). Overlap of potential feeding areas between the two individuals was 2.7 km2. We subsequently ground-truthed the area with the greatest overlap (Fig. 3b), and, by conducting opportunistic behavioural observations of Livingstone's flying foxes present in the trees during 17.00–21.00, confirmed that many trees were feeding trees. The feeding trees were located in agricultural fields interspersed with individual native and non-native trees. There was no natural forest in the area.

These findings demonstrate that GPS technology facilitates the detection of feeding sites and the identification of landscape use by Livingstone's flying foxes. Individuals displayed flexibility in roost selection, with both individuals visiting and resting in at least five known roost sites, similar to what has been observed for other flying foxes (Palmer & Woinarski, Reference Palmer and Woinarski2000; Vardon et al., Reference Vardon, Brocklehurst, Woinarski, Cunningham, Donnelly and Tidemann2001; Banack & Grant, Reference Banack and Grant2016; Oleksy et al., Reference Oleksy, Ayady, Tatayah, Jones, Howey and Froidevaux2019).

Natural, undisturbed forest occurs only in fragments across Anjouan, and only three long-term roosts are located in forest habitat (Daniel et al., Reference Daniel, Green, Doulton, Salim, Said and Hudson2017). That feeding sites were in farmed areas was unexpected, based on predictive modelling (Ibouroi et al., Reference Ibouroi, Cheha and Astruc2018). However, Ibouroi et al. (Reference Ibouroi, Cheha and Astruc2018) found that flying fox presence was correlated with tall trees, which may explain their persistence in a landscape dominated by agroforestry that harbours old-growth, native trees (Trewhella et al., Reference Trewhella, Rodriguez-Clark, Davies, Reason and Wray2001).

Our data and analyses of the movement of Livingstone's flying fox have potential to help improve conservation of the species by identifying areas of roosting and feeding, and to support targeted reforestation. We plan to continue research on this Critically Endangered species, using GPS tracking as a way of identifying landscape use and feeding trees, to increase the protection of this threatened bat species and its habitat.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ernest Seamark for providing training and equipment, Marc Büntjen for help with GPS tag programming, and Pascal Fust for scientific input in the planning phase. This study was funded by The Rufford Foundation and the Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund.

Author contributions

Study design: IM, AH, RO; collar design: KE-P, RO; fieldwork: IM, AH, KE-P, IS, BBAA, A-KF; data analysis: IM; writing: IM, HD, SSAC; project oversight: SSAC.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This research complied with the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards and with those of Sherwin et al. (Reference Sherwin, Christiansen, Duncan, Erhard, Lay and Mench2003). Animal handling was kept to a minimum and only the required number of individuals were captured. All researchers handling bats wore protective gloves and equipment was disinfected after each use to avoid the spread of disease. The research was conducted by Dahari and the University of Comoros with permission of the Comorian government under permits No. 94-018/AF (22 June 1994) and No. 01/31/MPE/CAB.

References

Aldridge, H.D.J.N. & Brigham, R.M. (1988) Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat a test of the 5% ‘rule’ of radio-telemetry. Journal of Mammalogy, 69, 379382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banack, S.A. & Grant, G.S. (2016) Spatial and temporal movement patterns of the flying fox, Pteropus tnganus, in American Samoa. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 11541163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boussougou, G.B., Brou, Y.T. & Mohamed, I. (2015) Changements de la couverture forestière dans l’île d'Anjouan entre 1995 et 2014. In Proceedings of the Spatial Analysis and GEOmatics Conference (eds Baazaoui, H., Claramunt, C. & Haddad, M.), pp. 114. SAGEO, Hammamet, Tunisia.Google Scholar
Calabrese, J.M., Fleming, C.H. & Gurarie, E. (2016) Ctmm: An R package for analyzing animal relocation data as a continuous-time stochastic process. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 11241132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calenge, C. (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling, 197, 516519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahari (2018) Rapport Annuel. Mutsamudu, Anjouan, Comoros. daharicomores.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Rapport_annuel_2018.pdf [accessed 24 February 2021].Google Scholar
Daniel, B.M., Green, K.E., Doulton, H., Salim, D.M., Said, I., Hudson, M. et al. (2017) A bat on the brink? A range-wide survey of the Critically Endangered Livingstone's fruit bat Pteropus livingstonii. Oryx, 51, 742751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doulton, H., Mohamed, M., Shepherd, G., Mohamed, S., Ali, B. & Maddison, N. (2015) Competing land-use in a small island developing state: using landscape approaches to manage sustainable outcomes in the Comoro Islands. In XIV World Forestry Congress (eds Sarre, A. & Lapstun, S.), pp. 19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
Granek, E. (2002) Conservation of Pteropus livingstonii based on roost site habitat characteristics on Anjouan and Moheli, Comoros islands. Biological Conservation, 108, 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijmans, R.J. (2019) Geosphere: Spherical Trigonometry. R package version 1.5–10. CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere [accessed 22 July 2020].Google Scholar
Ibouroi, M.T., Cheha, A. & Astruc, G. (2018) A habitat suitability analysis at multi–spatial scale of two sympatric flying fox species reveals the urgent need for conservation action. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 23952423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleksy, R.Z., Ayady, C.L., Tatayah, V., Jones, C., Howey, P.W., Froidevaux, J.S.P. et al. (2019) The movement ecology of the Mauritian flying fox (Pteropus niger): a long-term study using solar-powered GSM/GPS tags. Movement Ecology, 7, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Mara, M.T., Scharf, A.K., Fahr, J., Abedi-Lartey, M., Wikelski, M., Dechmann, D.K.N. & Safi, K. (2019) Overall dynamic body acceleration in straw-colored fruit bats increases in headwinds but not with airspeed. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, C. & Woinarski, J.C.Z. (2000) Seasonal roosts and foraging movements of the black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) in the Northern Territory: resource tracking in a landscape mosaic. Wildlife Research, 27, 169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QGIS Development Team (2019) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. qgis.osgeo.org [accessed 2019].Google Scholar
Racey, P.A. (2009) Reproductive assessment of bats. In Ecological and Behavioural Methods for the Study of Bats (eds Kunz, T.H. & Parsons, S.), pp. 249264. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. R-project.org [accessed 22 July 2020].Google Scholar
Sewall, B.J., Young, R., Trewhella, W.J., Rodríguez-Clark, K.M. & Granek, E.F. (2016) Pteropus livingstonii. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T18732A22081502. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T18732A22081502.en [accessed 1 October 2020].Google Scholar
Sherwin, C.M., Christiansen, S.B., Duncan, I.J.H., Erhard, H.W., Lay, D.C., Mench, J.A. et al. (2003) Guidelines for the ethical use of animals in applied animal behaviour research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81, 291305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trewhella, W.J., Rodriguez-Clark, K.M., Davies, J.G., Reason, P.F. & Wray, S. (2001) Sympatric fruit bat species (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) in the Comoro Isalnds (Western Indian Ocean): diurnality, feeding interactions and their conservation implications. Acta Chiropterologica, 3, 135147.Google Scholar
Vardon, M.J., Brocklehurst, P.S., Woinarski, J.C.Z., Cunningham, R.B., Donnelly, C.F. & Tidemann, C.R. (2001) Seasonal habitat use by flying-foxes, Pteropus alecto and P. scapulatus (Megachiroptera), in monsoonal Australia. Journal of Zoological Society London, 253, 523535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, N., Duengkae, P., Fahr, J., Dechmann, D.K., Phensakul, P., Khumbucha, W. et al. (2015) High-resolution GPS tracking of Lyle's flying fox between temples and orchards in central Thailand. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 79, 957968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikelski, M. & Kays, R. (2019) Movebank: Archive, Analysis and Sharing of Animal Movement Data. Max Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany. movebank.org [accessed June 2019].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Anjouan island in the Comoros archipelago, Western Indian Ocean, showing the 15 known long-term roost sites of Pteropus livingstonii and the site where the two individuals were captured. The dashed rectangle indicates the area covered by Fig. 3.

Figure 1

Table 1 Capture information and GPS data for two Pteropus livingstonii tagged with GPS loggers on Anjouan, Comoros.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Screenshot of the Movebank Acceleration Viewer (Wikelski & Kays, 2019), showing, from top to bottom, the oscillations along the z, x and y axes recorded by the GPS loggers. The acceleration data were used to distinguish between behavioural categories (resting, scratching, flying and moving/climbing).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Movement data of two individual P. livingstonii on Anjouan (Fig. 1) were used to estimate 95% kernel density ranges, presented as low likelihood, high optimal, and maximum likelihood bandwidth home range areas (a), and polygons depicting potential feeding areas (b). Roost sites are named according to the nearest villages. The arrow indicates the area where flying fox feeding behaviour was ground-truthed.

You have Access
Open access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Using GPS tracking for fruit bat conservation
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Using GPS tracking for fruit bat conservation
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Using GPS tracking for fruit bat conservation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *