Shortridge's capped langur Trachypithecus shortridgei (Wroughton, Reference Wroughton1915) is a colobine primate that inhabits low to mid-elevation evergreen and semi-evergreen forests east of the Chindwin River in north-eastern Myanmar, and in south-western China in the Nu and Dulong valleys (Pocock, Reference Pocock1939; Groves, Reference Groves2001; Htun et al., Reference Htun, Long and Richardson2008). Numbers of individuals are assumed to be low and declining as a result of a restricted geographical range, hunting pressure and widespread deforestation for agriculture and timber extraction. The total population is believed to have declined by at least 50% since 1972, primarily as a result of hunting and habitat loss (Htun et al., Reference Htun, Long and Richardson2008). Consequently, T. shortridgei is categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List (Htun et al., Reference Htun, Long and Richardson2008) and is listed in CITES Appendix I (CITES, 2014). In China it is a Category I protected species under Chinese animal conservation laws, and in Myanmar it is protected under the national Wildlife Protection Law (Htun et al., Reference Htun, Long and Richardson2008).
To achieve more successful management, a better understanding of the species is needed, including population size, distribution, threats, and impediments to its conservation. There are no population data available from Myanmar (Htun et al., Reference Htun, Long and Richardson2008), and the distribution and population data from China are outdated and based on scant field data collected using unclear or dubious methodologies. Li & Lin (Reference Li and Lin1983) suggested the range of T. shortridgei in China encompassed the length of the Gaoligong Mountains, based on a single male specimen collected in the Dulong valley in 1974. Ma & Wang (Reference Ma and Wang1988) estimated the total population size to be 500–600 individuals in the Dulong valley, but provided little detail of how these estimates were made. Wang (Reference Wang and Wang1998) confirmed the presence of T. shortridgei on the eastern slopes of the Gaoligong Mountains west of the Nu River, and Xu (Reference Xu1998) estimated these populations comprised 200–300 individuals in 8–10 groups. The latest estimate indicated a total population in China of c. 250 individuals, with < 1,500 km2 of suitable habitat (Forestry Department of Yunnan Province, 2001).
The presumed range of T. shortridgei spans a mostly contiguous forest ecosystem that includes northern Kachin State, Myanmar and the Dulong and Nu River valleys (Htun et al., Reference Htun, Long and Richardson2008). The low human population and inaccessibility of the region have protected its biodiversity (Myers et al., Reference Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, da Fonseca and Kent2000; Mittermeier et al., Reference Mittermeier, Robles Gil, Hoffmann, Pilgrim, Brooks, Mittermeier and da Fonseca2004); however, the region is beleaguered by an increasing number of environmental and socio-economic problems relating to poverty, civil unrest, illegal logging, smuggling of wildlife, drug trafficking, and hydro-development (Xu & Wilkes, Reference Xu and Wilkes2004; Kahrl et al., Reference Kahrl, Weyerhaeuser and Su2005; EIA, 2012; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wolf, Lassoie and Dong2013; Burma Rivers Network, 2014). Identifying and quantifying some of the threats to biodiversity in the region, and impediments to its protection, specifically in relation to T. shortridgei, will facilitate better-informed management decisions. We therefore determined the distribution and population size of T. shortridgei in China as a benchmark for future monitoring, and report and evaluate local factors threatening the species. We propose practical strategies for local conservation actions and ecosystem protection.
We conducted the survey in the Dulong (Irrawaddy) and Nu (Salween) River catchments in north-west Yunnan Province in south-west China (Fig. 1). Both river systems have their headwaters on the Tibetan plateau and flow southwards, forming deeply incised parallel valleys flanked by mountain ranges > 5,000 m. The topographic and climatic variation in the region results in a variety of natural habitat types, from subtropical broadleaved evergreen forest to high-alpine heath and meadows. Forests account for > 60% of the area (Weyerhaeuser et al., Reference Weyerhaeuser, Wilkes and Kahrl2005). The climate is dominated by the East and South Asia monsoons, with precipitation occurring mostly in the warm season during May–October. Winter tends to be cool and dry throughout the region. As a result of its steep topographic and climatic gradients, and unique biogeography, the region has globally significant levels of biodiversity and endemism, with several distinct ecosystems (Myers et al., Reference Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, da Fonseca and Kent2000; Mittermeier et al., Reference Mittermeier, Robles Gil, Hoffmann, Pilgrim, Brooks, Mittermeier and da Fonseca2004; UNESCO, 2014a).
The Dulong River and upper Nu River catchments are inhabited by members of > 10 ethnic minority groups, including Dulong (also written as Drung), Lisu, Nu and Tibetan, who practise a variety of livelihood strategies, including small-scale agriculture, food and medicine gathering, transhumant grazing, swidden agriculture, trade, and hunting and trapping (Buntaine et al., Reference Buntaine, Mullen and Lassoie2007). Local economies and many livelihood strategies have changed as a result of infrastructue development, population growth, market shifts, and government subsidies and regulations, with both positive and negative impacts on biodiversity (Xu & Wilkes, Reference Xu and Wilkes2004; Weyerhaeuser et al., Reference Weyerhaeuser, Wilkes and Kahrl2005). Strictly enforced bans on hunting and trapping in nature reserves and on the sale or trade of protected species have reduced market demand for many wildlife products; however, enforcement is difficult and illegal hunting is still widespread.
Community interviews can provide ecological information on threatened species, for conservation management (Jones et al., Reference Jones, Andriamarovololona, Hockley, Gibbons and Milner-Gulland2008). Within the Dulong and Nu catchments we established a targeted area on the basis of information gleaned from park reports (Xu, Reference Xu1998), historical reports (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Han, Chen, He and Li1996), regional reserve managers, and visual assessment of satellite imagery for potential habitat (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Huang, Zhao, Zhang, Sun and Scott2014). We conducted a series of interview surveys in the Dulong valley during 5–20 July 2010 and 7–25 November 2010, and west of the Nu River in the Gaoligong Mountains during 28 April–25 August 2012. Our interview subjects were mostly local people living in or near forests within the target search area. Interview subjects were identified through snowball sampling (Newing et al., Reference Newing, Eagle, Puri and Watson2011), beginning with the local leader in each village. We made a particular effort to select hunters and family elders with intimate, long-standing knowledge of the forest environment. We also interviewed numerous active forest patrollers and regional forest managers of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve. Interviews were brief, informal and unstructured (Xiang et al., Reference Xiang, Wang, Huo, Cui, Xiao, Quan and Zhong2007, Reference Xiang, Nie, Lei, Chang, Wei and Li2009; Fan et al., Reference Fan, Xiao, Hou, Ai, Wang and Lin2011). During the interviews we tested whether respondents could describe morphological characteristics of T. shortridgei, and whether they could identify T. shortridgei correctly from pictures of local primates, including Trachypithecus pileatus, Trachypithecus phayrei, Rhinopithecus strykeri, Macaca arctoides, Macaca assamensis and Hoolock leuconedys. If respondents could distinguish the species accurately we recorded all personal encounters with T. shortridgei, including time and date, location, group size, and group composition when possible.
During the interview survey period we also assessed the scope and magnitude of threats to T. shortridgei by gathering knowledge on the trapping success for T. shortridgei and other species, and on other community livelihood strategies that interact with the local habitat. As hunting and trapping protected species is illegal in China we recognized the sensitive nature of some interview data. Several approaches (e.g. the randomized response technique and the nominative technique) have been developed to collect data about illegal behaviour when perpetrators fear prosecution or repercussions (St. John et al., Reference St. John, Edwards-Jones, Gibbons and Jones2010). However, we found most communities were generally open and candid about historical hunting and trapping, and therefore we adopted a direct questioning approach (MacMillan & Nguyen, Reference MacMillan and Nguyen2014), supplementing the data with our visual observations of day-to-day activities. Before interviewing began in a village, each researcher generally lived with members of the community for several days, interacting with community members and reserve officers and participating in and learning about daily activities. This gave them time to develop a positive relationship with community members and identify interview candidates (Harris & Shilai, Reference Harris and Shilai1997). The field research for the Dulong was conducted by YCL, who is ethnic Dulong, from the Dulong valley, and has strong ties with local community members. Interviews were usually conducted in Mandarin Chinese, and if necessary in the Dulong (Drung) language in the Dulong valley; local translators assisted with interviews if the interview subjects only spoke another language.
To corroborate interview data we conducted field surveys in the southern Dulong valley, between Bukawang and Bapo, for 10 days each month during July 2012–July 2013 (130 days). We also carried out daily field surveys along the Gaoligong Mountains, near Pianma, Louzhang and Chengan in Lushui County, and near Zilijia and Lumadeng in Fugong County, during 22 September–2 December 2012 (47 days). We conducted all field survey work during the day (08.00–17.00), recording the location, habitat type, and size and composition of groups of T. shortridgei encountered. The Dulong field surveys were conducted by one individual (YCL); two 6–7 person teams conducted the surveys in the Gaoligong Mountains. When possible we used local information and guides.
To estimate changes to T. shortridgei's core habitat in China we used satellite imagery to calculate changes in vegetation cover in the Dulong valley during 1975–2009. We downloaded satellite imagery (resolution 60 × 60 m2) recorded in 1975, 1988, 2001, 2006 and 2009 (GIS Forum, 2012; NASA, 2012), and created visual interpretations using ArcGIS 9.2 (ESRI, Redlands, USA), categorizing vegetation into various land-cover types. For the purposes of this study we focused on vegetation categorized as (1) farmland, swidden agriculture and early seral scrubland, (2) secondary forest, or (3) mature native forest. We measured area, patch size and patch number for both forest types to make comparisons between years, as reported by Xiao et al. (Reference Xiao, Ding, Cui, Zhou and Zhao2003) and Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Fellowes, Jiang, Wang, Chan, Ren and Zhu2010). Visual interpretations of the satellite imagery were verified in the field. We performed a linear regression analysis of habitat change during 1975–2009, using Statistica 4.5 (Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, USA), with a significance level of 0.05.
We interviewed 715 people (including 160 hunters) at 136 locations in north-west Yunnan (Table 1, Fig. 1); 693 were male, 22 were female, and the mean age of respondents was 50.2 ± SD 15.6 years. Most people interviewed had lived and worked in and near the forest for > 30 years. The most common reasons for entering the forests included collection of non-timber forest products and herbal medicine, and grazing.
From interviews in the Dulong River valley we identified 19 groups of T. shortridgei (estimated 250–370 individuals; Table 2). During field surveys we observed two groups (Sida and Bukawang-3) repeatedly (> 10 times) in mixed evergreen and broadleaved forests near the river, around Bukawang and Sida villages. The Sida group consisted of seven individuals, and the Bukawang-3 group consisted of nine individuals (Table 2). Each group consisted of one adult male, 2–3 adult females and up to five juveniles.
Interview subjects in the Gaoligong Mountains in Gongshan, Lushui and Fugong Counties reported observations of 12 solitary individuals during 1975–2012 (Table 3). Each of these sightings was in low- to mid-elevation forests along the Gaoligong Mountains close to the border between China and Myanmar (Fig. 1), and all were in or near the Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve. Our field surveys in the same region did not yield any positive observations of T. shortridgei.
Using remote sensing we estimated mature native forests in the Dulong valley decreased by 34.7% (424.5 km2) during 1975–2009 (F 1,3 = 13.31, R 2 = 0.82, P = 0.03; Table 4). During the same period, mean forest patch size decreased from 978.3 to 276.1 ha, the number of forest patches increased from 125 to 289, and the area of swidden agriculture and seral scrubland increased by 254.7 km2 (Table 4). However, during 2001–2009 total forest cover increased by 80.4 km2, and swidden agriculture and seral scrubland decreased by 180.5 km2 (Table 4).
Illegal destruction of forest habitat has taken place both inside and outside the boundaries of the Reserve. Forest has been felled for fuelwood and building materials, and to clear land for livestock grazing, gardens, and cultivation of economic crops such as black cardamom Amomum tsao-ko, walnut Juglans regia, chestnut Castanea mollissima, sumac Toxicodendron vernicifluum and black pepper Piper nigrum.
Records of hunting and trapping of wild animals in the Dulong valley are in Table 5. Twelve T. shortridgei were reported killed since the 1970s (one was kept as a pet). Seven other species were also reported to be killed or kept as pets; the species killed in greatest abundance were takin Budorcas taxicolor taxicolor (23) and red muntjac Muntiacus muntjak (12). Food was the most common motivation for killing T. shortridgei and other wildlife, according to interview subjects, although cash income was also reported as a primary motivation (Table 5).
Most T. shortridgei were killed using traditional crossbows, typically constructed of an oak or bamboo wood prod and an oak stock. Arrows were typically c. 25–30 cm in length, made from bamboo, and often tipped with a paste from the poisonous dried root of Aconitum sp. (Ranunculaceae).
The most common method used to kill wildlife was trapping (Table 5). Trap types used included steel-jaw leg-hold traps and simple snares. Steel traps (18 cm diameter) intended primarily to catch bears were commonly used by hunters in the Dulong valley, and were observed at a density of c. 14 ha−1 in the forest (YCL, pers. obs.). Smaller steel traps (10 cm diameter) for catching small mammals and Galliformes were observed at a density of c. 10 ha−1 (YCL, pers. obs.). Snares were usually set to catch muntjacs, small mammals and Galliformes. Snare trap density was observed to be c. 1.5 ha−1 (YCL., pers. obs.); however, snares are, by design, difficult to detect, and some local people in the Dulong valley claimed they were at a density of 10 ha−1 in some places. Typically snares were set using a combination of basic, readily available purchased material and natural material found near the trap site, and were power activated (a tensioned tree or branch connected by lianas, twine or steel cables to a trigger mechanism, usually a small piece of twig or bamboo, and secured to an anchored twig or sapling stump). Traps and snares were typically set along animal paths in places with natural channelling in the vegetation, or using brush and bamboo sticks to funnel animal movement. Small steel traps were often used in tree cavities, to catch arboreal rodents, such as squirrels. Traps and snares were rarely baited.
Some animals were shot with small-calibre muzzle-loading rifles, which seemed to be used more often for extended hunting expeditions away from village centres. Personal firearms are illegal in China, with severe penalties, thus unsurprisingly most people were reluctant to discuss the prevalence of rifles. In 2013, 1 year after our interviews, 22 rifles were confiscated by local authorities in the Dulong valley.
We learned that in China the Endangered Shortridge's capped langur is limited mainly to the Dulong River valley, with a population of 250–370 individuals in 19 groups (Table 2, Fig. 1). Groups are generally structured around family groups comprising one male, two or more females and their immature offspring. Based on comparison with earlier estimates of 500–600 individuals in the Dulong valley (Ma & Wang, Reference Ma and Wang1988) the population appears to have declined; however, the methods used by Ma & Wang (Reference Ma and Wang1988) are unclear, making comparisons tenuous. We also learned from interviews that there are unlikely to be any viable populations of the species in China outside the Dulong valley. Xu (Reference Xu1998) estimated the population in that area to be 200–300 individuals in 8–10 groups, whereas we recorded only a few isolated sightings of solitary individuals. Although again the methods of Xu (Reference Xu1998) are unclear, the results indicate that the population in the Dulong valley has declined substantially.
The population decline is probably attributable to various factors, in particular in relation to habitat change and hunting pressure. The Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve was established in 1983 but for many years its boundaries were not clearly defined and regulations were poorly disseminated and rarely enforced. Tighter controls and strict regulations introduced in 1989 resulted in a sense of grievance and dissociation among local people in relation to the Reserve. Communities whose villages, cropland and traditional hunting and gathering grounds were designated within the boundary of the Reserve were subject to involuntary displacement and resettlement. Many people resist compliance, and continue to occupy traditional farm plots within the Reserve, subsidizing resource requirements with non-timber forest products, wood gathering, and hunting. In some parts of China forest felling has increased in the initial period after the establishment of a National Park, as people abandon more sustainable practices when land tenure is uncertain (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Linderman, Ouyang, An, Yang and Zhang2001). Cash crops, fuelwood collection and forest clearance affect forest structure, fragmenting forest habitat, and reducing and altering the habitat available to wildlife (Li, Reference Li2004; Bearer et al., Reference Bearer, Linderman, Huang, An, He and Liu2008; Yuan et al., Reference Yuan, Fei, Zhu, Cui, Ai and Fan2014).
Large-scale government projects have also had a significant impact on local communities, their management of natural resources and their interactions with wildlife. In response to floods in the lower Yangtze in 1998, the central government announced the National Forest Protection Programme in 2000, banning logging in the upper reaches of the Yangtze and Yellow River catchments as a watershed protection measure. Restrictions on forest felling were subsequently applied elsewhere, including the Nu and Dulong catchments. In conjunction with this programme the government also launched the Sloping Land Conversion Programme, to convert erodible cropland with slopes > 25° to forest and grassland (SFA, 2003). In return, farmers received subsidies in the form of cash or grain. The impacts of these programmes on local people have caused concern (Kahrl et al., Reference Kahrl, Weyerhaeuser and Su2005; Weyerhaeuser et al., Reference Weyerhaeuser, Wilkes and Kahrl2005; Shen et al., Reference Shen, Wilkes, Qian, Yin, Ren and Zhang2010). Many households struggle to produce enough food to meet their needs, and turn to income-generating activities such as collecting non-timber forest products and illegal hunting (Xu & Wilkes, Reference Xu and Wilkes2004). Despite these concerns government-led projects to arrest rates of deforestation are necessary to protect habitat for primary forest species. In the Dulong River catchment forests were reduced by 40% during 1975–2001 but recovered by 8% during 2001–2009 following government intervention. Although most ecosystems in China have long been affected by human interventions, the Dulong and Nu River valleys have been sparsely populated throughout human history, and human impacts on the natural forest ecosystem have been relatively small and localized, evolving with the use of imported technologies and crops (Chu, Reference Chu2006). Population growth and infrastructural development, such as roads and hydro-projects, which themselves bring an influx of tradespeople and new settlers to the area, will further exacerbate the demand for resources and impose a high-resource-use economy on local people (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Ma, Tashi, Fu, Lu and Melick2005). Similar-sized projects in Myanmar, such as the Irrawaddy/N'Mai hydro schemes (Burma Rivers Network, 2014), along with rapid deforestation (Global Witness, 2009), will probably have a negative effect on langur populations there. Road development will increase mobility, potentially facilitating the wildlife trade (Suárez et al., Reference Suárez, Morales, Cueva, Utreras Bucheli, Zapata-Ríos and Toral2009).
Our results also indicated that Shortridge's capped langur is threatened by hunting in the Dulong valley and is unlikely to re-establish populations in the Gaoligong Mountains unless changes occur in cultural practices and park management. Most langurs killed in the Dulong valley were reportedly shot for food. Most hunters have an in-depth knowledge of the local wildlife, and therefore it is unlikely that the langurs were shot by mistake, suggesting that hunters target langurs. Twenty percent of the medium/large mammals reported killed were Shortridge's langurs (Table 5). Reports of Shortridge's capped langurs being smuggled from Myanmar, where wildlife laws are largely unregulated and punishment is less severe than in China (Martin & Redford, Reference Martin and Redford2000; Xu & Wilkes, Reference Xu and Wilkes2004; Shepherd & Nijman, Reference Shepherd and Nijman2008; this study), suggest there is an increasing and lucrative illegal market for the species. Eleven T. shortridgei individuals smuggled into China from Myanmar were confiscated during 1999–2004, and 10 were confiscated during 2004–2009 (Lei, Reference Lei1999; Wen, Reference Wen2004; Wu, Reference Wu2005; Zhang, Reference Zhang2009).
With increasing focus on regulation of firearms, there is concern that people may turn to trapping instead (Li & Jiang, Reference Li and Jiang2014). Traps and snares are difficult to detect, regulate and monitor (Li & Jiang, Reference Li and Jiang2014), and the materials are cheap and accessible, traps can be well concealed, and personal accountability is less than for guns or crossbows. The main concern is that traps are less targeted and may affect multiple species. We observed snares and traps capable of killing langurs set at densities > 10 ha−1.
Based on what we learned through interviews and engagement with communities we conclude that several actions are required to protect Shortridge's capped langur. Firstly, we recommend an independent systematic review of the management strategy for Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve. North-western Yunnan is a region of global importance for biodiversity (Myers et al., Reference Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, da Fonseca and Kent2000; Stotz et al., Reference Stotz, Harris, Moskovits, Hao, Yi and Adelmann2003; Mittermeier et al., Reference Mittermeier, Robles Gil, Hoffmann, Pilgrim, Brooks, Mittermeier and da Fonseca2004; UNESCO, 2014a,b) and has at least 10 resident ethnic groups, and therefore the management of the Reserve will require a unique approach, requiring critical thought. We suggest the review examines the successes and shortcomings of the current system, and considers more integrative management, community involvement, and alternative methods for nature conservation (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Ma, Tashi, Fu, Lu and Melick2005; Xu & Melick, Reference Xu and Melick2007). We suggest a comprehensive census of non-threatened populations of fauna and non-timber forest products, which may in future allow some concession for traditional hunting or gathering practices. We also suggest mapping the traditional extent of swidden agriculture and grazing, to delineate human agricultural practices in the region over time and support a management strategy that incorporates human interactions with the environment.
The feeling of dissociation from, or resentment towards, the objectives of the Reserve among local people is a significant threat to the survival of T. shortridgei and other species in the region. There is little incentive for local people to obey the laws or nurture what is inside the Reserve. Many people are dissatisfied with their position in society and will risk prosecution for short-term economic gains. We support maintaining strict prohibition of killing or trading threatened species, and maintaining absolute limits to forest clearance (and increasing enforcement in these areas), but we also see a good case for leniency for small-scale swidden agriculture and wood collection, and possibly even targeted hunting using only traditional crossbows in designated areas, to support livelihood needs and well-being, maintain cultural identities, and foster good communication and stewardship in the local communities. This strategy is being piloted in several National Parks in Vietnam (MacMillan & Nguyen, Reference MacMillan and Nguyen2014). The trade-off would be a ban on all guns, traps of all types, and the sale of any wild animal. Degraded forests can gradually recover and increase their potential for sustaining threatened species (Bearer et al., Reference Bearer, Linderman, Huang, An, He and Liu2008) but recovery will be dependent on local cooperation.
Another important factor in species protection is education. We suggest that local knowledge of the forest, agriculture and culture needs to be maintained, and integrated with current ecological knowledge. People must be made aware of the rarity of certain species, and their food and habitat requirements. Many people have a parochial view of forest species and fail to realize that a species that is common locally could be absent elsewhere (M. Scott, unpubl. data). In some parts of north-western Yunnan, religio-cultural beliefs effectively protect biodiversity (Xue, Reference Xue2009). However, in the Dulong and Nu valleys many groups (e.g. Dulong, Lisu, Nu) with animistic beliefs have few restrictions or taboos associated with hunting (Harris & Shilai, Reference Harris and Shilai1997). These ethnic groups believe that animals are bestowed by deities, and successful hunters are considered lucky. Among these groups, education could be an effective mechanism to protect species and gain compliance with regulations (Harris & Shilai, Reference Harris and Shilai1997).
Inconsistency in enforcement of wildlife law is another impediment to protection. We recommend capacity-building projects to increase the knowledge of Reserve staff, develop professionalism, and train staff to collect ecological data. We also think it is important to establish an effective cooperation mechanism between Myanmar and China to stop illegal smuggling of wildlife. It may be necessary to employ more local rangers tasked specifically with patrolling and monitoring groups of T. shortridgei, clearing illegal traps, educating local people on the legalities of hunting and trapping, and enforcing compliance.
This study was supported by Yunnan Green Environmental Development Fund, a central financial assistance fund for capacity-building of Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve, National Natural Science Foundation of China (#31160422, #30960084), Programme for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-12-1079), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M542379), and Key Subject of Wildlife Conservation and Utilization in Yunnan Province. We thank Nujiang Administrative Bureau of Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve for their support, and Yang XG, Yang SJ and Dong XH for their assistance in the field.
Liang-Wei Cui studies behavioural ecology and conservation biology of threatened primates. Ying-Chun Li and Jin-Fa Li are studying the foraging behaviour and habitat use of Trachypithecus shortridgei. Chi Ma is studying the foraging behaviour of Trachypithecus phayrei and the impacts of tsaoko cardamom production on habitat use in Gaoligong Nature Reserve. Matthew B. Scott has broad interests in conservation biology and the interaction between resource users and wildlife. Xiao-Yang He, Dong-Hui Li and Jun Sun are responsible for the management of nature reserves in the Nu and Dulong River valleys, and local community education. Wen-Mo Sun is interested in applying geospatial techniques to wildlife conservation. Wen Xiao has broad interests in conservation biology and wildlife ecology, and is studying how human-related changes to the environment affect wild animal populations.