Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:08:36.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a Practice of Palimpsestic Listening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2021

Richard Cross
Richard Cross*
Affiliation:
School of Media, Arts and Humanities, University of Sussex, UK
*
Email: rc390@sussex.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article invites reflection on the ambiguity of sonic temporalities as the lines between physicality and immediacy become increasingly blurred. Through the notion that digital technologies are haunted by analogic process, I foreground the concept of Palimpsestic Listening to explore the musical qualities and critical resonances of sonic acts and objects in hybrid physical/digital systems that evoke layered temporalities that are ‘historically distinct nonetheless linked’. I also seek to illustrate the significance of engaging practically with this concept by discussing the methods behind my composition D/ta Ro} – A Dialectical Trash Heap, a sound installation that interrogates the relationship between sonic materiality and digital audio processing and how acts of erasure and time-stretching might influence the layering of disparate sound materials.

Type
Article
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 26 , Issue 1: The Sonic and the Electronic in Improvisation , April 2021 , pp. 145 - 153
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnet, B. 2004. Technical Machines and Evolution. CTheory: Journal of Theory Technology and Culture. https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/file/10114a9f-76bb-4fbd-9ae5-d8fa34825fe8/1/PDF%20(Published%20version).pdf (accessed 19 April 2021).Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. and Tiedemann, R. 1999. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Blocker, J. 2012. Repetition: A Skin Which Unravels. In Jones, A. and Heathfield, A. (eds.), Perform, Repeat, Record. Live Art in History. Bristol: Intellect, 199–208.Google Scholar
Bolter, J. and Grusin, R. 2000. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1994. Audiovision: Sound on Screen. Chichester: Columbia.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. 2019. Amazon Admits Employees Listen to Alexa Conversations. Independent Online. www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/amazon-alexa-echo-listening-spy-security-a8865056.html (accessed 10 June 2020).Google Scholar
Dastur, F. 2000. Phenomenology of the Event: Waiting and Surprise. Hypatia 15(4): 178–89.Google Scholar
Daughtry, J. M. 2013. Acoustic Palimpsests and the Politics of Listening. Music & Politics 7(1). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mp/9460447.0007.101/--acoustic-palimpsests-and-the-politics-of-listening?rgn=main;view=fulltext (accessed 16 April 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. 2011. Cinema 2: The Time Image. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dillon, S. 2007. The Palimpsest: Literature, Criticism, Theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. 2012. What Is Hauntology? Film Quarterly 66(1): 16–24.Google Scholar
Garde-Hansen, J., Hoskins, A. and Reading, A. 2009. Save As… Digital Memories. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellier-Tinoco, R. 2019. Performing Palimpsest Bodies: Post-Memory Theatre Experiments in Mexico. Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
Henriques, J. 2003. Sonic Dominance and Reggae Sound System Sessions. In Bull, M. and Back, L. (eds.) Auditory Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg, 451–80.Google Scholar
Highmore, B. 2002. Everyday Life and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, M. and Taylor, D. 2013. The Archive in Transit. On the Subject of Archives 10(2). https://hemisphericinstitute.org/en/emisferica-91/91-editorial-remarks (accessed 27 August 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, D. 2013. Earth Sound Earth Signal. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. 2009. Cracked Media: The Sound of Malfunction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. 2018. Materials of Sound: Sound as (More Than) Sound. Journal of Sonic Studies. www.researchcatalogue.net/view/456784/456785 (accessed 27 August 2019).Google Scholar
Kittler, F. 1986. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LaBelle, B. 2006. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lange-Berndt, P. 2015. Introduction: How to Be Complicit with Materials. In Lange-Berndt, P. (ed.) Materiality. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press and Whitechapel Gallery, 12–23.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McDonagh, J. 1987. Writings on the Mind: Thomas De Quincey and the Importance of the Palimpsest in Nineteenth Century Thought. Prose Studies 10(2): 207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, A. 2002. Transductions: Bodies and Machines at Speed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Menkman, R. 2011. The Glitch Moment(Um). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.Google Scholar
Nelson, V. 2001. The Secret Life of Puppets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, S. J. 2006. Generic versus Idiosyncratic Expression in Live Performance Using Digital Tools. International Journal of Contemporary Performance 11(4): 23–9.Google Scholar
Norman, S. J. 2016a. Object of Notation. Symposium on Notation for New Instruments and Musical Expression, IRCAM, Paris, 22 September. www.researchgate.net/publication/308946265_OBJECT_OF_NOTATION (accessed 10 August 2019).Google Scholar
Norman, S. J. 2016b. Senses of Liveness for Digital Times. IETM Publications. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61175/ (accessed 15 May 2019).Google Scholar
Parikka, J. 2012. What Is Media Archaeology? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. 2016. Digital. In Peters, B. (ed.) Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information, Society and Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J. D. 2016. Cloud. In Peters, B. (ed.) Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information, Society and Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T. and Bijsterveld, K. 2004. Sound Studies: New Technologies and Music. Social Studies of Science 34(5): 635–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porcello, T. 1998. Tails Out: Social Phenomenology and the Ethnographic Representation of Technology in Music-Making. Ethnomusicology 42(3): 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, C. 2015. Alien Agencies: Experimental Encounters with Art in the Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schrag, S. 2016. Memory. In Peters, B. (ed.) Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information, Society and Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 206–16.Google Scholar
Simondon, G. 1980. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Steedman, C. 2002. Dust: The Archive and Cultural History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2016. Analog. In Peters, B. (ed.) Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information, Society and Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 31–44.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. 1998. Technics and Time I: The Fault of Epimetheus. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiegler, B. 2002. The Discreet Image. In Derrida, J. and Stiegler, B. (eds.) Echographies of Television. Cambridge: Polity, 148–9.Google Scholar
van Dijk, J. 2007. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. 2014. Why Process is Extrinsic to the Digital. www.academia.edu/11496288/Why_Process_is_Extrinsic_to_the_Digital_Domain (accessed 10 January 2019).Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. 2008. The Digital, the Analog and the Spectral: Echographies from ‘My Life in the Bush of Ghosts’. Angelaki 13(1): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cross supplementary movie and sound file

Video and sound file

Download Cross supplementary movie and sound file(File)
File 82.4 MB