Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T06:29:24.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Best Betrayal’: the Documentation of performance on Video and Film, Part 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Annabelle Melzer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether described as adaptations, documentations, translations, or transcriptions, the video cassettes which allow us to see performances on video are proliferating. Not always easily available for begging, borrowing, or buying, not always willingly turned over by the theatre companies who hold them for in-house use, often lost or erased by television channels, and always beleaguered with copyright problems, these electronic arts ‘documents’ are none the less causing a revolution in teaching, rehearsal methods, and research. In what constitutes a first detailed mapping of the territory, Annabelle Melzer's two-part article deals with the theoretical and aesthetic questions surrounding performance documentation, with some of the hands-on issues of such filming – and with her own journey to seek out the documents themselves. Annabelle Melzer, Associate Professor of Theatre at the University of Tel Aviv, is completing ten years of research on the adaptation and documentation of theatre through moving image documents. Shakespeare on Screen, the first volume of her multi-volume filmography, Theatre on Screen, appeared in 1991, receiving the Choice and American Library Association awards as outstanding reference book of 1991. Her articles on avant-garde performance have appeared in Artforum, Theatre Research International, and Comparative Drama, and her Hazan Prize-winning book Dada and Surrealist Performance has just been reissued by Johns Hopkins University Press. She is at present writing a book on the theatricality of war.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 42 , May 1995 , pp. 147 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Peter, Brook, ‘A Talk with Peter Brook,’ American Theater, III (1969–1970), p. 16–23.Google Scholar

2. Jean, Genet, quoted in Richard, Kalisz, ‘Televised Theatricality or Televised Theatre?’ in Robert, L. Erenstein, ed., Theatre and Television (Amsterdam: International Theatre Bookshop, 1988), p. 79.Google Scholar

3. Richard, Kalisz, op. cit., p. 80.Google Scholar

4. Ritsaert ten Cate, in Erenstein, op. cit., p. 56.

5. Patrice, Pavis, ‘Reflections on the Notation of the Theatrical Performance,’ in Languages of the Stage: Essays in the Semiology of the Theatre. (New York: PAJ Publications, 1982), P. 129.Google Scholar

6. Peter, Brook, ‘Filmer le Théâre’ Cahiers Thédãtre Louvain, XLVI (1981), p. 41.Google Scholar

7. Ritsaert ten Cate, in Erenstein, op. cit., p. 51–2.

8. Merce, Cunningham, in Peter, Z. Grossman, ‘Talking with Merce Cunningham About Video,’ Dance Scope, XIII, Nos. 2–3 (1979), p. 57Google Scholar

9. Peter van Stapele, in Erenstein, op. cit., P. 235.

10. Jeffrey, Bush and Peter, Z. Grossman, ‘Video-dance,’ Dance Scope, IX, No.3 (Spring–Summer 1975), p. 11.Google Scholar

11. Marvin, Carlson, ‘The Theatre Event and Filmic Documentation,’ Degres Cahiers Théätre Louvain, XL, No. 48 (Winter 1986).Google Scholar

12. Ronald, Argelander, ‘Photo-Documentation’, The Drama Review, Fall 1974.Google Scholar

13. Richard Kalisz, op. cit., P. 80.

14. Pavis, op. cit., p. 112.

15. Hackett, James K., ‘Hackett's Strong Arguments for Pictures’, Moving Picture World, 07 1914,Google Scholar quoted in John, Tibbits, The American Theatrical Film (Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1985), P. 68–9.Google Scholar

16. ‘Reinhardt's Mystery Play in Pictures’, New York Dramatic Mirror, 26 06 1912, p. 22, quoted in Tibbits, op. cit., p. 55.Google Scholar

17. Susan, Sontag, ‘Film and Theatre,’ Tulane Drama Review, XI, No. 1 (Fall 1966), p. 25.Google Scholar

18. Jonathan, Miller. Subsequent Performances (London: Faber and Faber, 1986), p. 52.Google Scholar

19. Ibid.

20. Much of the little work published on performance documentation has been hidden from the English reading public. In 1981 a single issue of Cahiers Théâtre Louvain (No. 46), devoted to ‘Filmer le Théâter’, transcribed in French the CNRS round-table talks on filming theatre, held at lvry-sur-Seine (1977), with contributors including Denis Bablet, Peter Brook, Antoine Vitez, Ariane Mnouchkine, and other theatre and film professionals and scholars. In 1985 Marco de Marinis' ‘A Faithful Batrayal of Performance: Notes on the Use of Video in Theater’, in New Theeatre Quarterly, 1, No. 4 (11 1985), p. 383–9.Google Scholar introducecd the English reader to the ‘Italian school’, which has done some of the most fertile work in the field of performance documentation, notably Ferruccio Marottis's ‘Per ritarre il grido che ho sognato: 100 film alle adici del teatro’, and his ‘Intervista’, in Nicola Savarese, Film didattici sul teatro. In 1988 Robert L. Erenstein published the anthology Theatre and Television, the proceedings of the International FIRT/NOS conference on the subject, held in Hilversum, the Netherlands, a year earlier. Marvin Carlson's ‘The Theare Event and Filmic Documentation’ appeared in Degres, XL, No. 48 (Winter 1986), a French journal devoted to studies in semiotics which has also published such pieces as Paul Bouissac's essay on filmed circus performance, ‘Espace performatif et espace mediatisé: Ia déconstruction du spectacle de cirque dans les representations televisées’ (XVI, No. 57, 1989), and its single issue (No. 49, 1986) devoted to ‘La Captation’. Modern Drama also published a special issue in 1985 (XXVIII, No. 1), ‘Modern Drama and the Media’. Patrice Pavis has published regularly on the subject in such essays as ‘Reflections on the Notation of the Theatrical Performance’, in Languages of the Sta1ge (New York:PAJ Publications, 1982), and ‘Le Théâtre et les médias: specificité et interferences’, in Helbo, A. et al., eds., Théâtre: modes d'approches (Bruxelles, 1987).Google Scholar Performance documentation is also referred to in Egil Tornqvist's Transposing Drama: Studies in Representation (New York: St. Martin's, 1991), and in Jonathan, Miller'sSubsequent Performances (London: Faber and Faber, 1986).Google Scholar

21. Peter, Brook, Cahiers Théâtre Louvain, op. cit., p.41.Google Scholar

22. Antoine, Vitez, Cahiers Théâtre Louvain, op. cit., p. 41.Google Scholar

23. Denis, Bablet, Cahiers Théâtre Louvain, op. cit., p. 58Google Scholar

24. Margot, Lewitin, in SLW, ‘Transforming Theatre: the Women's Interart Center’, Theatre Crafts, XVII, No. 8 (10 1983).Google Scholar

25. Sonja, de Leeuw, ‘Television in the Grip of Theatre: Is There a Way Out? Introductory Notes on a Television-Specific Approach to the Theatre-Television Relationship’, in Erenstein, op. cit., p. 210.Google Scholar

26. Marcelle, Imhauser, ‘Are the Dice Loaded?’ in Erenstein, op. cit., p. 100.Google Scholar

27. A joint initiative of ‘L’Aile francophone du centre belge de l'institut international du théâtre' (ITI) and ‘La Direction de l'audiovisuel de Ia communauté francaise’, with the collaboration of le centre culturel ‘Le Botanique’, the T.T.B.F., the S.A.C.D., the C.G.R.I., and the ‘Centre d'aide technique et de formation théâtrale’.

28. ‘Editorial’, Cinéaste, XCI, No. 3 (1988).Google Scholar

29. Peter, Brook, Cahiers Théâtre Louvain, op. cit., p. 28.Google Scholar

30. ‘Tests Start at Paramount's New LI. Sound Studios – First Full Length in November’, Variety, 25 07 1928, p. 7, quoted in Tibbits, op. cit., p. 116.Google Scholar

31. Francois, Luxereau, Cahiers Théâtre Louvain, op. cit., p. 86.Google Scholar

32. Marcelle, Imhauser, in Erenstein, op. cit., p. 100.Google Scholar

33. Ritsaert, ten Cate, ‘Making Theatre beyond Television’, in Erenstein, op. cit., p. 50.Google Scholar