Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:44:19.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III. The Poet (1)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Get access

Extract

From external sources we have only one indication of Catullus’s birth and death, and that is wrong. Jerome’s Chronicle dates him 87-57 B.C. saying that he died in his thirtieth year. It is highly probably that C. Memmius, with Catullus on his staff, was in Bithynia in 57-56, and certain that Catullus was still writing in 55, as he alludes to Caesar’s expedition to Britain (11.11-12). Jerome is more likely to be in error about the date than the age. This led Lachmann to propose the dates of 77-47, supposing that Vatinius could not swear by his consulship before becoming consul in 47, but this is unjustified as we know from Cicero (Vat. 5.11). Paul Maas in a lively but fragile article during the Second World War noted that no poem requires a date before 56 (unless Lesbia is Clodia Metelli – and she may have remarried: see below), thought that Catullus’s brother died in 54, and that Catullus, made two voyages to Asia and lived till about 52. The case for this was further taken up by the argument (of long standing) that Jerome must have confused the consulate of Q. Caecilius Metellus Nepos in 57 with that of Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius in 52. But Metellus Pius was not one of the original consuls in 52 and could not have given his name to the year.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Surveys in the Classics , Volume 20: Catullus , 1988 , pp. 10 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

See also P. Gilbert and M. Renard in Latomus (1942), 93 ff.; H. Bardon (1970A), pp. 5-6; (1970B), pp. 5-6.

References

Notes

2. P. Maas (1942); E. V. Marmorale (1957); C. Deroux (1970), 619. See also H. J. Leon (1959-60), 107; R. J. M. Lindsay (1948); M. Schuster (1948).

3. F. Della Corte (1951), p. 109.

4. Quaestiones Catulli (Giessen, 1862).

5. Baehrens, A., Catulli Veronensis Liber (Leipzig, 1885)Google Scholar; Schmidt, B., C. Valerii Catulli Veronensis Carmina (Leipzig, 1887)Google Scholar; Ellis, R., A Commentary on Catullus (Oxford, 1889)Google Scholar.

6. Macnaughton, H., The Story of Catullus (London, 1899)Google Scholar.

7. (1939) pp. 79-82.

8. M. Platnauer (1954), pp. 288-92.

9. H. Bardon (1970B).

10. T. P. Wiseman (1985), pp. 183-9.

11. ibid., pp. 206-10.

12. Baehrens, A., Catulli Veronensis Liber (1885), pp. 57–61 Google Scholar.

13. T. K. Hubbard (1983).

14. K. Quinn (1973), pp. 9-20.

15. J. Ferguson (1986), 2 cf. Dittmar, Helen in LCM 9 (1984), 74-6Google Scholar.

16. T. P. Wiseman (1968), (1985); Schmidt, E.A. in Philologus 117 (1973), 215-42Google Scholar.

17. Birt, W., Das antike Buchwesen (1882), pp. 408-13Google Scholar.

18. G. P. Goold (1983); Clausen, W.V. in CPh 71 (1976), 37-43Google Scholar; Marilyn B. Skinner (1981).

19. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U.v., Sappho und Simonides (Berlin, 1913), p. 292 Google Scholar.

20. Barwick, K. in Philologus 102 (1958), 284–318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Segal, C. in Latomus 27 (1968), 308-21Google Scholar.

22. Marilyn B. Skinner (1981).

23. P. Y. Forsyth (1984).

24. T. P. Wiseman (1969), p. 34; (1985), pp. 152-5.

25. Forsyth, P.Y. in CW 72 (1979), 403-8Google Scholar.

26. J. Ferguson (1986), 2-6, 18-20.

27. Macleod, C.W. in CQ 23 (1973), 304-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar