Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:56:13.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land Inequality in Rural Southeastern Turkey: Rethinking Agricultural Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Barış Karapınar
Barış Karapınar*
Affiliation:
Development Studies Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A village in the province of Diyarbakır in Southeastern Turkey has recently appeared in many national newspapers and on TV with headlines such as “Rebellion against the landlord continues,” “Tractor chain against the landlord,” and “Peasants united against the landlord.” For many, this was rather amusing news – reminding them of a popular comedy film based on a fictional representation of peasants rebelling against their landlord in the 1970s. In reality, however, the actions were a serious appeal by peasants voicing their plight about extreme inequality in rural Southeastern Anatolia.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 32 , Spring 2005 , pp. 165 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“‘Ağaya İsyan’ Sürüyor.” Cumhuriyet, November 10, 2004.Google Scholar
“‘Ağaya İsyan’ Sürüyor.” Radikal, September 17, 2004.Google Scholar
“Ağaya Karşı Traktör Zinciri.” Milliyet, September 17, 2004.Google Scholar
Akçay, Adnan. “Toprak Ağalığından Kapitalist işletmeciliğe Türkiye Tarımında Büyük Topraklı işletmeler.” In 75 Yılda Köylerden Şehirlere, edited by Baydar, Oya. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 1999.Google Scholar
Akçay, Adnan“Traditional Large Land Ownership and Its Transformation in Two Southeast Anatolian Villages.” unpublished Master Thesis, METU, 1985.Google Scholar
Akşit, Bahattin. “Kırsal Dönüşüm ve Köy Araştırmaları 1960-1980.” In Türkiye'de Tanmsal Yapılar, edited by Pamuk, Şevket and Toprak, Zafer. Ankara: Yurt Yayınevi, 1988.Google Scholar
Akşit, Bahattin “Studies in Rural Transformation in Turkey 1950-1990.” In Culture and Economy, edited by Stirling, Paul. Cambridgeshire: The Eothen Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Akşit, Bahattin, and Akçay, Adnan A.. “Socioculturel Aspects of Irrigation Practices in South-Eastern Turkey.” Water Resources Development 13, no. 4 (1997): 523-40.Google Scholar
Avcioğlu, Doğan. Türkiye'nin Düzeni: Dün, Bugün. Yann. Vol. 1. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1969.Google Scholar
Aydın, Zülküf. Underdevelopment and Rural Structures in Southeastern Turkey: The Household Economy of Cigis and Kalhana. London: Ithaca Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ömer Lutfi. “Malikâne-Ûivânî Sistemi.” In Türkiye'de Toprak Meselesi, edited by Barkan, Ömer Lütfi, 151-208. İstanbul: Gözlem Yayınları, 1980.Google Scholar
Barkey, Henri, and Fuller, Graham E.. Turkey's Kurdish Question, paperback ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.Google Scholar
“Başkaldıran Köylüler Hakim önündeydiler.” Cumhuriyet, March 1, 2005.Google Scholar
“Bismil Sinan Köylüleri Ağalıktan Kurtulmaya Kararlı.” Aydınlık, September 19, 2004.Google Scholar
Boratav, Korkut. “1963 ve 1970 Tarım Sayımlarına Göre Türkiye'de Toprak Dağılımı.” In 75 Yılda Köylerden Şehirlere, edited by Baydar, Oya, 86-90. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 1999.Google Scholar
Borras, Saturnino Jr. “Questioning Market-Led Agrarian Reform: Experience from Brazil, Colombia, and South Africa.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 3 (2003): 367-94.Google Scholar
Chayanov, A.V.The Theory of Peasant Economy. Edited by Thorner, Daniel, Kerblay, Basile and Smith, R.E.F.. Illinois: Irwin, 1966.Google Scholar
Çinar, Mine, and Silier, Oya. Türk Taamında işletmeler Arası Farklıilaşm. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1979.Google Scholar
De Janvry, Alain, Platteau, Jean-Philippe, Gordillo, Gustavo, and Sadoulet, Elisabeth. “Access to Land and Land Policy Reforms.” In Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action, edited by Janvry, Alain De, Platteau, Jean-Philippe, Gordillo, Gustavo and Sadoulet, Elisabeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janvry, De, Alain, , Sadoulet, Elisabeth, and Wolford, Wendy. “The Changing Role of the States in Latin American Land Reforms.” In Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action, edited by Janvry, Alain de, Gordillo, Gustavo, Platteau, Jean-Philippe and Sadoulet, Elisabeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deininger, Klaus. “Negotiated Land Reform as One Way of Land Access: Experiences from Colombia, Brazil, and South Africa.” In Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action, edited by Janvry, Alain de, Gordillo, Gustavo, Platteau, Jean-Philippe and Sadoulet, Elisabeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Eastwood, R., and Lipton, M.. “Pro-Poor Growth and Pro-Growth Poverty Reduction: Meaning, Evidence, and Policy Implementations.” Asian Development Review 18, no. 2 (2000): 22–58.Google Scholar
GAP Administration. 2005. Southeastern Anatolia Project Official Website. In, www.gap.gov.tr.Google Scholar
““İsyankar Köylüler' Tutuklandı.” Cumhuriyet, December 9, 2004.Google Scholar
Jwaideh, Wadie. “The Kurdish Nationalist Movement: Its Origins and Development.” Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, 1960.Google Scholar
Jwaideh, WadieKürt Milliyetçiliğinin Tarihi: Kökenleri ve Gelişimi, İstanbul: İletişim, 1999.Google Scholar
Karaömerlioğlu, M. Asim. “Elite Perceptions of Land Reform in Early Republican Turkey.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 27, no. 3 (2000): 115-41.Google Scholar
Kay, Cristobal. “Comparative Development of the European Manorial System and the Latin American Hacienda System. “Journal of Peasant Studies 2, no. 1 (1974): 69–98.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. “Paths of Rural Transformation in Turkey.“ Journal of Peasant Studies 10, no. 1 (1983): 34–49.Google Scholar
Keyder, ÇağlarUlusal Kalkınmacılığın İfası, İstanbul: Metis, 1993.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar, and Pamuk, Şevket. “Çiftçiyi Topraklandırma Kanunu Üzerine Tezler.” Yapıt, no. 7 (1984-1985).Google Scholar
“Kibar Feyzo Filmi Bismil'de Gerçek Oldu.” Sabah, August 24, 2004.Google Scholar
“Köylü Direndi, Ağanın Adamları Kaçtı!” Aydınlık, December 12, 2004.Google Scholar
“Köylüler Ağa'ya Karşı Birleşti.” Cumhuriyet, October 2, 2004.Google Scholar
“Köylüler Topraklarını İstiyor.” Cumhuriyet, March 31, 2005.Google Scholar
Köymen, Oya, and Özturkcan, Meriç. “Türkiye'de Toprak Dağılımı Üstüne Bazı Notlar.” In 75 Yılda Köylerden Şehirlere, edited by Baydar, Oya, 75-96. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 1999.Google Scholar
Kudat, Ayse, and Bayram, Mümtaz. “Şanlıurfa-Harran Plains on-Farm and Village Development Project.” In Social Assessment and Agricultural Reform in Central Asia and Turkey, edited by Kudat, Ayşe, Peabody, Stan and Keyder, Çaşlar. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, David. A Modern History of the Kurds. London: I.B. Tauris, 2000.Google Scholar
MST (Movimento Dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra) Brazil's Landless Rural Workers' Movement. 2005. In, www.mstbrazil.org.Google Scholar
Mutlu, Servet. “The Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) of Turkey: Its Context, Objectives and Prospects.” Orient, no. 37 (1996): 59–86.Google Scholar
Patnaik, Utsa. “Global Capitalism, Deflation and Agrarian Crisis in Developing Countries.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 1-2 (2003): 33–66.Google Scholar
Patnaik, Utsa “Neo-Populism and Marxism: The Chayanovian View of the Agrarian Question and Its Fundamental Fallacy.” Journal of Peasant Studies 6, no. 4 (1979): 375–420.Google Scholar
Reardon, Tom. Rural Non-Farm Income in Developing Countries, Background Paper Prepared for the FAO for the Non-Farm Workshop at the World Bank in 1999, 2004.Google Scholar
Sadoulet, Elisabeth, Murgai, Rinku, and Janvry, Alain de. “Access to Land Via Land Rental Markets.” In Access to Land, Rural Poverty, and Public Action, edited by Janvry, Alain de, Gordillo, Gustavo, Platteau, Jean-Philippe and Sadoulet, Elisabeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS).Census of Population 1935. İStanbul: Publication No: 75, Vol. 18, 1937.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS).Census of Population 1955. Ankara: Publication No: 412, 1961.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS).Census of Population 1980. Ankara: Publication No: 1072, 1984.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS).Census of Population 1985. Ankara: Publication No: 1237, 1988.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS).Census of Population 2000. Ankara, 2003.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS).General Agricultural Census 1950. Ankara: Publication No: 371, 1956.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS). General Agricultural Census 2001. In, www.die.gov.tr.Google Scholar
State Institute of Statistics (SIS).Zirai İstatistik özetleri 1941-1962. Ankara: Publication No: 447, 1963.Google Scholar
Taraklı, Duran. Çiftçiyi Topraklandırma Kanunu ve Sonuçlan (Güney-Doğu Anadolu Uygulama ve örnekleme Sonuçlanyla). Ankara: ODTÜ, 1976.Google Scholar
Tezel, Yahya. Cumhuriyet Döneminin İktisat Tarihi (1923-1950). Ankara: Yurt Yayınları, 1982.Google Scholar
Tökin, İsmail Hüsrev. Türkiye Köy İktisadiyatı. İstanbul: İletişim, 1990 (1934).Google Scholar
White, Paul. Primitive Rebels or Revolutionary Modernizes. New York: Zed Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Wolford, Wendy. “Producing Community: The MST and Land Reform Settlements in Brazil.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 5 (2003): 500-20.Google Scholar
World Bank. Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount of US$ 600 Million to the Republic of Turkey for and Agricultural Reform Implementation Project/Loan: Report No: 21177-TU, 2001.Google Scholar
Yalman, Nur. “On Land Disputes in Eastern Turkey.” In Islam and Its Cultural Divergence, edited by Tikku, G.L.. Ann Arbor, 1977.Google Scholar