Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T10:03:58.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Religiously We Dwell: Heidegger's Later Contribution to Philosophy of Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Brian Rogers*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Philosophy, 50 Stone Road East, N1G 2W1, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

The Enlightenment has bequeathed to us the notion that religion can be treated as an object of theoretical inquiry, giving rise to the “secular” concept of religion as a field of meaning or truth-content that is (ideally) isolable from the particular practices that constitute religious worship. I argue that the later Heidegger's “poetic” thought disrupts the paradigm underlying the secular concept of religion and points us toward an alternative understanding of religion as tantamount to being-in-the-world. Heidegger thus opens the way for post-secular reflection on the transformative potential of religion in human culture.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Dominican Council

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augustine, St. 1959. On True Religion. Translated by Burleigh, J.H.S.. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.Google Scholar
Crowe, Benjamin D. 2008. Heidegger's Phenomenology of Religion: Realism and Cultural Criticism. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana UP.Google Scholar
de Lubac, Henri. 1950. Catholicism. Translated by Sheppard, Lancelot C.. London, UK: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14:125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J.G. (1762) / 2007. “Aesthetica in Nuce.” In Johann Georg Hamann: Writings on Philosophy and Language. Edited and Translated by Haynes, Kenneth, 6095. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1983. Die Grundbegriff der Metaphysik. Welt—Endlichkeit—Einsamkeit. GA 29–30. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. / 1995. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Translated by McNeill, William and Walker, Nicholas. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana UP. (FCM)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2009. “Hölderlin and the Essence of Poetry.”Translated by Jerome Veith. In The Heidegger Reader, edited by Figal, Günter, 117–29. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana UP. (HEP)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1977. Holzwege. GA 5. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. / 2002. Off the Beaten Track. Edited and Translated by Young, Julian and Haynes, Kenneth. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. (OBT)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2002. Identität und Differenz/Identity and Difference, bilingual edition. Translated by Stambaugh, Joan. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1985. Unterwegs zur Sprache. GA 12. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2000. Vorträge und Aufsätze. GA 7. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann./1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper & Row. (PLT)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1967. Wegmarken. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. (WM)/1998. Pathmarks. Translated by McNeill, William. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. (PM)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1956/58. Was ist das—die Philosophie?/What is Philosophy? Bilingual Edition. Translated by Kluback, William and Wilde, Jean T.. Tübingen: Pfullingen/Twayne Publishers. (WIP)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1987. Zollikoner Seminare, Protokolle—Gespräche—Briefe Herausgegeben vom Medard Boss. GA 89. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. / 2001. “Conversations with Medard Boss, 1961–1972: March 3, 1972, Freiburg-Zähringen.” In Zollikon Seminars: Protocols-Conversations-Letters. Translated by Mayr, Franz and Askay, Richard, edited by Boss, Medard, 149234. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP. (ZS)Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1983. Fear and Trembling/Repetition. Translated by Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2009. “Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide?Critical Inquiry 35:836–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. 1991. God Without Being. Translated by Carlson, Thomas A.. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Milbank, John. 2009. “The End of Dialogue.” In The Future of Love: Essays in Political Theology, edited by Milbank, John, 279300. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Graeme. 1975. “Heidegger on Thinking.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 13:491503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polt, Richard. 2006. The Emergency of Being: On Heidegger's Contributions to Philosophy. Ithaca/London: Cornell, UP.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1991. “The Human Experience of Time and Narrative.” Translated by David Pallauer. In A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination, edited by Valdés, Mario J., 99116. Toronto/Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sikka, Sonia. 1997. Forms of Transcendence: Heidegger and Medieval Mystical Theology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Christian. 2003. Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture. Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, James K.A. 2009. Desiring the Kingdom: Worship, Worldview, and Cultural Formation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Vedder, Ben. 2007. Heidegger's Philosophy of Religion: From God to the Gods. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne UP.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2003. “Between the earth and the sky: Heidegger on life after the death of God.” In Religion After Metaphysics, edited by Wrathall, Mark A., 7883. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A.. 2006. “The Revealed Word and World Disclosure: Heidegger and Pascal on the Phenomenology of Religious Faith,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 37:7677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar