Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T19:29:50.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intervention in Aboriginal Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

John Howard the then Prime Minister of Australia introduced a series of measures (June 2007) to regulate the life of Aboriginal peoples in the Northern Territory, an action that became known as the Intervention. The measures were introduced as emergency measures designed to control the widespread physical and sexual abuse of children, the excessive use of alcohol, poor levels of education and unemployment rife among Aboriginal people in the Territory according to a government sponsored report, Little Children are Sacred. The local councils of aboriginal communities were immediately dissolved, their property acquired by compulsory leases for five years and business managers appointed to administer them. After an initial occupation by army units and police to stabilize the situation in Aboriginal communities and settlements, the Federal government introduced a number of measures designed to channel welfare money for purchase of wholesome food, to limit access to alcohol and it made a commitment to refurbish schools and clinics and to build houses to ease overcrowding. These were all good things to do and cost the government hundreds of millions of dollars, but were imposed from without in a bureaucratic manner with little consultation of local people. Construction programs were conducted largely by non-aboriginal workers and school curricula were not revised with an eye to Aboriginal cultural needs or interests. The ancient culture of Aboriginal people depends upon the land, family relationship and upon the Dreaming. The bureaucracy dealt with Aboriginal communities as if it were dealing with a particularly difficult city suburb that required a new master plan. Instead of this, Aboriginal people must resolve their communal problems in their own way. For that to happen there is a need to encourage initiative and creativity and conversion of life. The Intervention and what followed did not deal well with the cultural side of its program and it did more to smother Aboriginal initiative than to encourage it.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2011 The Author. New Blackfriars © 2011 The Dominican Council

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ampe Akelyeremane Meke MeKarle, “Little Children are Sacred,” Report of the Northern Territory Board of Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse, 2007, report sgned by Rex Wild and Pat Anderson’

2 Northern Territory Emergency Response Act 2007, see Hansard [Australian] June 21 2007

3 Martin, John Hilary, “#56 Australian Aboriginal Societies,”Oxford Handbook of Global Religions, ed. Juergensmeyer, M., Oxford Univ. Press, 2006Google Scholar.

4 Since the Intervention attempts have been made to force communities to agree to extended leases in return for special funding for housing. To insist that what is being imposed is merely leasehold makes little difference since a lease on land for 99 years, or even 40 years, effectively removes that property from community initiative and control and dilutes tribal structures.