Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-ntdpv Total loading time: 0.589 Render date: 2022-01-28T20:35:56.028Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Waldo Heliodoor Zagwijn (1928–2018): the instigator and architect of European chronostratigraphy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2019

Henry Hooghiemstra
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098XHAmsterdam, the Netherlands
Wim Z. Hoek
Affiliation:
Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On 26 June 2018 Waldo Heliodoor Zagwijn died at the age of 89. He was an Emeritus Professor of the Faculty of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. As a geologist, palynologist and palaeobotanist he focused on developing a stratigraphy of the Netherlands based on changes in vegetation and climate. The Dutch setting of a subsiding basin, and the clear signal of a sequence of glacial–interglacial cycles, was promising. As early as the late 1950s it became clear that the Quaternary Period included more than the previously assumed four ice ages in the Netherlands. In his PhD thesis Zagwijn defined the start of the Quaternary around 2.5 million years before the present (2.5 Ma). The international community accepted Zagwijn’s arguments after he retired. He showed how the rivers Meuse, Scheldt and Rhine had built the Netherlands in four dimensions. He is the instigator and architect of the climate- and chronostratigraphy of the Quaternary Period of Western Europe.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

Early education

Waldo Zagwijn was born on 16 October 1928 in The Hague. His father, a composer, had married when he was 50. Waldo’s uncle was a music conductor but Waldo did not inherit the family’s musical genes. His mother was much younger and had travelled a lot in her 20s, to Africa and elsewhere. Later, she worked as a telephone operator. She had a collection of minerals, and perhaps this interest explains Waldo’s second name ‘Heliodoor’ (Al2Be3, a light-green mineral). Is it surprising that Waldo became a geologist?

Waldo attended the Haganum Gymnasium in The Hague where the well-known Dr Schierbeek taught biology. During the war he persuaded Waldo to spend a summer in the province of Limburg, where he collected fossils in the famous ‘Heimansgroeve’. Waldo collected fossil seeds and fruits, and his interest in Earth sciences mushroomed. When Waldo left the gymnasium in 1947, studying geology was an obvious choice.

Academic education in Leiden

Waldo studied geology at Leiden University from 1947 to 1952. He was taught by professors Escher, Niggli, de Sitter, Van der Vlerk (geology), Florschütz (palaeobotany) and Lam (botany). He chose to study the Quaternary, a field of research in which his teachers Van der Vlerk and Florschütz had already achieved significant recognition. Florschütz did pioneering work in palynology in the 1930s and is considered the founding father of Dutch palynology. Later, Waldo Zagwijn played an important part in the application of palynology in applied geology, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s. Within five years, while also having a job teaching students the basics of palynology, Waldo finished his studies (July 1952). Florschütz and Van der Vlerk must have been inspiring teachers. Thomas van der Hammen writes in his obituary on Florschütz, ‘Nearly three months before his death I received a letter from Van der Vlerk full of the same spirit as 25 years before. His mental capacity had in no way diminished and it seemed as if he had not aged’ (modified after Van der Hammen, Reference Van der Hammen1974).

Van der Vlerk and Florschütz published a very inspiring book Nederland in het ijstijdvak; de geschiedenis van flora, fauna en klimaat, toen aap en mammoet ons land bewoonden (‘The Netherlands during the Ice Ages; history of flora, fauna and climate, when ape and mammoth lived in our country’) (Van der Vlerk & Florschütz, Reference Van der Vlerk and Florschütz1950). The concepts explained in this book had a substantial influence on the development of Quaternary research in the Netherlands and on the education of a new generation of geo-ecologists, including Thomas van der Hammen and Waldo Zagwijn. Zagwijn took no interest in plants a priori, but he realised how this type of information could supplement regular geological information. Zagwijn became an all-round man early in his career. In 1952 he obtained his doctorate summa cum laude with geology, palaeontology and botany as the main subjects. Then, he joined the army.

Development of pollen analysis

Between the two world wars, palynological research developed rapidly (Birks & Berglund, Reference Birks and Berglund2017), becoming an essential instrument in stratigraphical correlation and relative age determination. Based on a geological–palaeobotanical–palaeoecological context, Waldo was able to reconstruct the regional climate history. Subsequently he compared the climate history of the Netherlands to that of Western and Mediterranean Europe. He was interested in relatively warm intervals (interglacials and interstadials) for practical reasons. During warm intervals the Netherlands was covered by vegetation, leaving evidence (seeds, fruits, pollen) in the sediments (Fig. 1). The lack of this palaeobotanical evidence in glacial deposits leads to the conclusion that during the coldest phases of glacial periods, the Netherlands had hardly any vegetation cover. Zagwijn placed the changing patterns of vegetation in a four-dimensional time–space image and reconstructed the palaeogeographical evolution of Western Europe. In the Netherlands pollen analysis was applied in e.g. archaeology, palaeoclimatology and industry, and in many government-funded projects varying from geological mapping to infrastructural works.

Fig. 1. Waldo Zagwijn in his favourite surroundings, studying plant remains in the Belfeld Clay in a pit at Maalbeek, 1992 (after de Jong, Reference De Jong1995).

A career at the Geological Survey

In April 1954 Waldo was employed at the Geological Survey. One of his first duties was to contribute several chapters of the Geological History of the Netherlands, edited by Pannekoek (Reference Pannekoek1956), which served as an explanatory volume to the Geological Map of the Netherlands on the scale of 1:200,000 published by the Royal Netherlands Geological and Mining Society (KNGMG) and the Geological Survey (RGD). The contents of this volume gave an early glimpse of his future career, with his contributions on: continental Miocene, continental Pliocene, Praetiglian, Tiglian, Needian, stratigraphy and periglacial phenomena of the Tubantian, aeolian sands of the Tubantian, Older Holocene deeper peat, peat, and recent blown sand and inland dunes. Together with Jan Zonneveld he wrote one of his first papers on the complexity of the Cromerian (Zagwijn & Zonneveld, Reference Zagwijn and Zonneveld1956). At the Geological Survey, he became head of the Department of Palaeobotany and Stratigraphy and was encouraged to study for a PhD. Professor Van der Vlerk, studying the Pleistocene of the Netherlands, was his supervisor. In contrast to older geological periods, defined on the basis of biostratigraphic evidence, Pleistocene stratigraphy was based on geomorphological evidence. The four Pleistocene ice ages of Western Europe (Günz, Mindel, Riss and Würm) had been defined on the evidence of moraines and river terraces using the terminology of Penck and Brückner (Reference Penck and Brückner1901–1909).

While working on his thesis Zagwijn published papers showing that the classical subdivision of the Pleistocene was too simplistic (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1956, Reference Zagwijn1957). In 1960 Zagwijn was awarded a PhD summa cum laude for his thesis ‘Aspects of the Pliocene and early Pleistocene vegetation of the Netherlands’. He was the first to show that the Pleistocene included more than four ice ages (Fig. 2). In Waldo’s thesis (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1960) the warm period of the Tiglian was not addressed, as Florschütz had already reserved this period for his own studies. Later, Waldo also published a paper about the Tiglian (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1963a) and a well-illustrated synthesis of his thesis for a wider audience (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1963b).

Fig. 2. The early and middle Pleistocene division nomenclature developed by Zagwijn (after Cohen & Gibbard Reference Cohen and Gibbard2019). Courtesy of K. Cohen.

Waldo married Reinske Sjoerds, a petrological laboratory technician at the Geological Survey. They had two sons, Peter (1965) and Erik (1968). Waldo was a well-organised man who worked full days at the Geological Survey but brought little work home. He had friendly contact with many colleagues, but maintained some distance as he liked his privacy.

Pollen analysis and palaeobotany were not the main objectives, but he used vegetation and climate history as a way to develop Quaternary stratigraphy. After Libby had discovered the radiocarbon-dating method Waldo immediately applied it and was able to date his earlier-published ‘Amersfoort’ interstadial at 64,000 years BP (uncalibrated) (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1961). The Geological Survey focused on geological mapping and applied geology but the relevance of using palaeobotany and palynology as a scientific instrument was well-recognised. Zagwijn was often out in the field, particularly in the area around Reuver and Tegelen in the Southeastern Netherlands, near the Dutch–German border (see also Westerhoff, Reference Westerhoff2009). He was in close contact with survey geologists in Krefeld, Nordrhein-Westphalia. At this time, the opencast lignite mines in the Lower Rhine Embayment were opened and steadily excavated to a depth of 400 m. Well-developed lowland sequences of Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene deposits were exposed there and the stratigraphy could be studied to new levels of detail. Later in his career Zagwijn also included the Holocene period in his studies.

Conceptual contributions to the start of the Quaternary

Zagwijn was much involved in the definition of the base of the Pleistocene. In 1957 he had already argued that the Pleistocene should start at the moment when thermophilous trees began to disappear from the European flora: this was during the cold period of the Pretiglian (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1957). He showed that climate cycles had also occurred in previous periods of the Pliocene but with less impact on Western European vegetation.

Zagwijn had expanded his terrestrial chronostratigraphy with sequences in Belgium (Zagwijn & Paepe, Reference Zagwijn and Paepe1968; Paepe & Zagwijn, Reference Paepe and Zagwijn1972), Germany (Zagwijn & Menke, Reference Zagwijn and Menke1971) and France (Suc & Zagwijn, Reference Suc and Zagwijn1983; Zagwijn & Suc, Reference Zagwijn and Suc1984) and found the climate cycles largely corresponded with oscillations in the marine oxygen isotope record. While more and more δ18O records had been constructed from long marine sediment cores, the marine δ18O record such as the V28-239 record of Shackleton & Opdyke (Reference Shackleton and Opdyke1976) had grown into a detailed record of global significance. In contrast, Zagwijn had to study short sediment cores and exposed profiles from many different locations, and his job was to complete a difficult jigsaw puzzle. His locations were close to the expansions of the glacial ice sheets, and the sedimentary archive had either partially been eroded or was no longer in situ. All the parts of the puzzle showed short and incomplete intervals of the Quaternary. In Western Europe the first long and continuous sedimentary archive covering a full glacial–interglacial cycle is found in northern France (Woillard & Mook, Reference Woillard and Mook1982). Zagwijn’s ability to deal with a four-dimensional dataset allowed him to build a solid chronostratigraphical framework from many short intervals and from a suite of locations. His encyclopaedic knowledge of the details of many published pollen records was very helpful. There is an interesting correspondence with Nick Shackleton who also remembered the details of many δ18O records. In discussions after congress presentations Zagwijn showed his erudition by knowing the evidence; discussions were always sharp, with much content, but sympathetic.

In the 1970s, discussions focused on the number and intensity of Pleistocene glaciations affecting Northwest Europe (de Jong, Reference De Jong1988). A paper in collaboration with English colleagues Phil Gibbard and Richard West well reflects the state of knowledge at the end of the 1980s (Gibbard et al., Reference Gibbard, West, Zagwijn, Balson, Burger, Funnell, Jeffrey, De Jong, Van Kolfschoten, Lister, Meijer, Norton, Preece, Rose, Stuart, Whiteman and Zalasiewicz1991). Marine geologists preferred to place the start of the Pleistocene at c.1.77 Ma, close to the start of the Olduvai palaeomagnetic subchron. However, considering climate, landscape and biotic evolution on the continents, changes in conditions around 1.77 Ma had little significance. Zagwijn saw the earlier slotted Pretiglian interval as the time when thermophilous trees disappeared from the Western European flora – more strongly than in Pliocene climate fluctuations before. The east–west orientation of European mountains (Alps, Pyrenees), and the southward expansion of the Scandinavian ice sheet that squeezed the latitudinally organised European vegetation zones, was leaving powerful evidence in the sedimentary archive in this part of the world, whereas in other parts of continents conditions and outcomes were different. Therefore, using ‘a first ice age’ to explain changing biogeographical patterns may be misleading. This process of migrating vegetation zones is well illustrated in the chapter ‘The floral record of the late Cenozoic of Europe’ (Van der Hammen et al., Reference Van der Hammen, Wijmstra, Zagwijn and Turekian1971), a classic paper still frequently cited.

Zagwijn used palaeobotanic evidence and its implications to build a chronostratigraphic framework. Every time he found the Pretiglian to be the logical start of the Quaternary period (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1963a, Reference Zagwijn1974a, Reference Zagwijn, Saito and Burkle1975a, Reference Zagwijn1982, Reference Zagwijn1985, Reference Zagwijn1992). Zagwijn defined several warm interglacials and interstadials and named them. On the basis of regional vegetation reconstructions he showed that up to one million years ago, glacial refugia of thermophilous trees were relatively close to the Netherlands (Central France and Southern Germany), whereas during the last million years these were further away (near the Alps and Mediteranean shores). In terms of palynologically inferred temperature fluctuations, there was good correlation with the ocean-averaged marine δ18O record (e.g. the LR04 stack of Lisiecky & Raymo, Reference Lisiecky and Raymo2005) that showed similar differences in intensity before and after c.1 Ma, a change dubbed ‘the mid-Pleistocene revolution’ (e.g. Head & Gibbard, Reference Head and Gibbard2005). The early and middle Pleistocene division nomenclature developed by Zagwijn is still used today (Fig. 2 after Cohen & Gibbard, Reference Cohen and Gibbard2019).

Serving geological mapping of the Netherlands, Zagwijn was involved in the lithostratigraphical division and nomenclature of the Dutch Quaternary (Zagwijn & Van Staalduinen, Reference Zagwijn and Van Staalduinen1975). In the pre-Quaternary period Zagwijn had recognised several less significant cool intervals, such as the Reuverian. Based on the presence of thermophilous trees such as Carya, Pterocarya and Tsuga, Zagwijn defined the Eburonian glacial, the Waalian interglacial and the Menapian glacial periods (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1957, Reference Zagwijn1960). Based on the same arboreal taxa, he argued that the early–middle Pleistocene transition should be placed between the Menapian and the Cromerian Complex. He studied the interglacial Bavelian Complex, chronostratigraphically positioned between the Menapian and the Cromerian Complex (Zagwijn et al., Reference Zagwijn, Van Montfrans and Zandstra1971), and marking the end of the early Pleistocene, with Jan de Jong (Zagwijn & de Jong, Reference Zagwijn and De Jong1984). He worked on the Holsteinian and Saalian organic beds in the Middle Pleistocene (de Ridder & Zagwijn, Reference De Ridder and Zagwijn1962; Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1973, Reference Zagwijn1978). For the Eemian of the Netherlands, he published a sea-level record (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1983, Reference Zagwijn1996). In the late Pleistocene Zagwijn studied the Amersfoort, Hengelo and Moershoofd interstadials (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1961, Reference Zagwijn1974b, Reference Zagwijn1989a; van der Hammen et al., Reference Van der Hammen, Maarleveld, Vogel and Zagwijn1967). Towards the end of his career he studied the Eemian and Holocene interglacials, using marker taxa to build consistent climate reconstructions (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1994, Reference Zagwijn1996). Together with Saskia Jelgersma, Jan de Jong and the physical geographer Jean François van Regteren Altena, Zagwijn studied the coastal dunes in profiles several kilometres long near IJmuiden, along the Noordzeekanaal and in the Waterleidingduinen (dune area with infiltration basins to produce drinking water for Amsterdam). They identified the so-called Old Dunes and Young Dunes between the villages of Bergen and Monster. Radiocarbon-dated soil horizons reflected alternating dry and wet periods. The authors show an increasing human impact on the dune area since the late Middle Ages. These studies contributed to understanding of the geology, archaeology and vegetation history of the coastal dune landscape (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1965, Reference Zagwijn1969, Reference Zagwijn1971, Reference Zagwijn1984; Jelgersma et al., Reference Jelgersma, De Jong, Zagwijn and Van Regteren Altena1970; van der Maarel & Zagwijn, Reference Van der Maarel and Zagwijn1971). This understanding aggregated in the monumental series of books Wilde Planten; flora en vegetatie in onze natuurgebieden (‘Wild plants, flora and vegetation of our nature reserves’) (Westhoff et al., Reference Westhoff, Bakker, Van Leeuwen and Van der Voo1971) in which Zagwijn showed how the present-day surface of the Netherlands is related to the complex structure of the subsurface.

The Geological Survey was mapping the North Sea basin, mainly for aggregates and other mineral resources; however, for Zagwijn the North Sea basin sediments were of importance in developing palaeomagnetic records. After the start of the Pleistocene had been defined (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1960), palaeomagnetism showed 2.3 million years to be the base of the Quaternary (Van Montfrans, Reference Van Montfrans1971). Where Zagwijn placed the start of the Pleistocene in the North Sea basin, sediment accumulation increased tenfold. Tectonic uplift of the hinterland was a possible explanation; however, according to Zagwijn, the increasing amplitude of climate fluctuations from the Pretiglian onwards (2.56–2.44 Ma) meant that Western Europe was mostly north of the forest line during much of a glacial period, and forest was gradually replaced by steppe, tundra and polar deserts. With the help of palaeomagnetic records Zagwijn and Suc (Montpellier) found a reliable correlation between the chronostratigraphies of Western Europe and the Mediterranean area (Suc & Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1983; Zagwijn & Suc, Reference Zagwijn and Suc1984).

The start of the Quaternary period has long been discussed. Arguments from marine geology (a start at 1.77 Ma) long prevailed over compelling evidence from the continents (a start at c. 2.6 Ma). In a summary at the end of his career, Zagwijn again argued for a start around 2.3 Ma (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1992); as he was nearing retirement he could make a definite statement: ‘Despite recent attempts, in particular by marine palaeontologists, to minimize the status of the Quaternary and even to deny it a place of its own in the stratigraphic scale, the present author is of the opinion that the exceptional climatic evolution that the planet Earth has witnessed in its latest history and which resulted in repeated large-scale glaciation in the northern hemisphere, is a sufficiently valid criterion to assign this interval a status of its own on the Period level.’ When he was 82 the International Commission on Stratigraphy of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS-ICS) formalised the redefinition of the start of the Pleistocene at c.2.58 Ma (Gibbard et al., Reference Gibbard, Head and Walker2010). This was not only a recognition of the concept published in Zagwijn’s 1960 thesis, but also a plea for a more prominent role of climate swings, also reflected in long palynological records, in the stratigraphy of the Quaternary (Suc et al., Reference Suc, Popescu, Bertini, Head, Gibbard and Diniz2018). Zagwijn did not see this acceptance as a personal victory; he had his own reasons for placing the start of the Pleistocene around 2.3 Ma, and he knew that other criteria are used in other regions. Zagwijn was too much of a scientist to be excited by other colleagues accepting or not his arguments.

Palaeogeographical maps

Probably during two glacial periods of the Pleistocene only, the northern part of the Netherlands was covered by ice. This caused the courses of the rivers Meuse, Scheldt and Rhine to change repeatedly. Zagwijn drew maps and showed in a spatial–temporal framework how the Netherlands were shaped during successive stages of the Quaternary (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1974c, Reference Zagwijn1975b, Reference Zagwijn, Oele, Schüttenhelm and Wiggers1979, Reference Zagwijn1989b; Van Staalduinen et al., Reference Van Staalduinen, Van Adrichem-Bogaert, Bless, Doppert, Harsveldt, Oele, Van Montfrans, Wermuth and Zagwijn1979) and he became well known for his popular scientific palaeogeographical maps of the Netherlands, showing how the Low Countries got their shape over Pleistocene and Holocene times (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1986). At the turn of the twenty-first century, palaeogeographical understanding of the Netherlands continued to expand, partly inspired by the work of Waldo Zagwijn (e.g. Berendsen & Stouthamer, Reference Berendsen and Stouthamer2001; Busschers, Reference Busschers2008; Westerhoff, Reference Westerhoff2009; Peeters et al., Reference Peeters, Busschers, Stouthamer, Bosch, Van den Berg, Wallinga, Versendaal, Bunnik and Middelkoop2016). The set of 12 palaeogeographical maps in the Atlas van Nederland in het Holoceen (Vos et al., Reference Vos, Bazelmans, Weerts and Van der Meulen2011) and updated versions (Vos & De Vries, Reference Vos and De Vries2013) show the impressive detail currently reached for different parts of the Netherlands – owing to continued data collection and computerised data combination (Hoek, Reference Hoek1997b; Van der Meulen et al., Reference Van der Meulen, Doornenbal, Gunnink, Stafleu, Schokker, Vernes, Van Geer, Van Gessel, Van Heteren, Van Leeuwen, Bakker, Bogaard, Busschers, Griffioen, Gruijters, Kiden, Schroot, Simmelink, Van Berkel, Van der Krogt, Westerhoff and Van Daalen2013; Pierik et al., Reference Pierik, Cohen and Stouthamer2016; Cohen et al., Reference Cohen, Dambrink, De Bruijn, Marges, Erkens, Pierik, Koster, Stafleu, Schokker, Hijma and Lauwerier2017a,b; Woolderink et al., Reference Woolderink, Kasse, Cohen, Hoek and Van Balen2019) as well as to the inspiration of Zagwijn’s palaeogeographical legacy (Berendsen & Stouthamer, Reference Berendsen and Stouthamer2001; Westerhoff, Reference Westerhoff2009; Vos, Reference Vos2015).

Zagwijn’s expertise was frequently consulted

Zagwijn’s research was key to palaeobotany, geology, climatology, physics and soil science coming together. Florschütz (1887–1965) had developed the foundations and contacts between academia, industry, museums and governmental organisations. Zagwijn expanded this field using new methods (C14-dating, palaeomagnetism) and new proxies. His personal archive contains much correspondence with colleagues from institutes representing many disciplines such as geology, oceanography, anthropology, archaeology, botany, zoology and palynology. Correspondence with governmental offices also increased substantially: foreign geological surveys and biostratigraphical companies. In the Netherlands Zagwijn was consulted by governmental offices about drinking-water, the establishment of polders in the IJsselmeer, the construction of canals in Twente, and by the Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat) for coastal protection. Many of his colleagues were well trained in thinking long-term. Robert C. Bright from the University of Minnesota wrote to Saskia Jelgersma – in a letter forwarded to Zagwijn because he was a member of the Netherlands’ Radiocarbon Dating Commission – on results of the samples he had submitted: his letter starts ‘It seems like a million years ago when we had a short meeting in Boulder …’

Zagwijn’s archive is an impressive source of information and it shows he was frequently consulted by colleagues about the interpretation of new data. Although time-consuming, it contributed to an ever-improving understanding of the climate stratigraphy of Western Europe. It is hardly surprising that he was often asked to contribute to national and international commissions; to name but a few: the IUGS-ICS Subcommission for Stratigraphic Classification; the INQUA (International Union for Quaternary Research) Subcommission on the Pleistocene of Europe (1967–1993); the Scientific Committee UNESCO–IUGS International Geological Correlation Programme (1976–1981); the Commission for Biosociology and Palaeobotany of the Royal Netherlands Botanical Society (1958–1961); the Foundation for Isotope Geological Research (1970–1985); the ministerial Advisory Commission of Natural History Museums (1981–1993); and the section Earth Sciences of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (1986–1993). His contributions to the INQUA were fundamental. He was a member, later chairman, of the INQUA-Netherlands Commission (1963–1993), and a member of the INQUA Commission for the Palaeogeographic Atlas of the Quaternary.

Zagwijn was a member of the editorial boards of Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology (1966–1971), Géologie Méditerranéenne (1975–1993), Bulletín de l’Association Française pour l’Etude du Quaternaire (1980–1993), Acta Palynologica (1989–1993) and Quaternary International (1989–1993); he was also an external examiner of PhD committees in the Netherlands and France.

Both Zagwijn and Van der Hammen were involved in the famous Climate/Long Range Investigation Mapping and Predictions Project (CLIMAP) of the US National Science Foundation. In 1974, in Amsterdam, they organised a workshop entitled ‘The climate record of the last million years’, in which top international scientists were involved. The results of the CLIMAP project were cited for decades, showing that the understanding of this group of scientists was far ahead of general societal perception of the impact of climate change.

International recognition

For a long time Zagwijn was active in the German Quaternary Association (DEUQUA) and he received the Albrecht Penck Medal in 1972. In 1974, Zagwijn and Van der Hammen received the Van Waterschoot van der Gracht Medal of the Royal Geological and Mining Society of the Netherlands (KNGMG). In 1980, Zagwijn was appointed a member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (KNAW) and in 1983 he was appointed Officier in de Orde van Oranje Nassau by the queen. He was elected an Honorary Life Fellow of INQUA in 1987, and an Honorary Member of the Quaternary Research Association in 1994.

Professor at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

In 1989 Zagwijn was appointed Professor of ‘Quaternary Palynology’ at Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam (Fig. 3). He was proud of this move so near the end of his career and held his inaugural lecture on Interglacials (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1991a). His teaching as professor included a fascinating series of lectures on the Quaternary vegetation history of Europe (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1991b). His unprecedented knowledge of the evidence was obvious and it became clear why he was the person who had completed the climate stratigraphical jigsaw puzzle. As there was only a short time before his retirement Zagwijn supervised only one PhD student, Wim Hoek, who got his PhD with the thesis ‘Palaeogeography of Lateglacial vegetations’ (Hoek, Reference Hoek1997a,b). This subject had developed in the 1970s but Zagwijn himself was unable to compile that much data; he had to wait for this unique opportunity. The Lateglacial, though, was a period which he investigated for his very first scientific publication (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1952).

Fig. 3. Waldo Zagwijn interviewed on the occasion of his appointment at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in 1989. Courtesy of mrs. R. Zagwijn-Sjoerds and collection photo press agency De Boer, Haarlem.

As well as teaching at Vrije Universiteit for one day a week, Zagwijn was involved in developing the new building for the Geological Survey. Hindered by delays in the building process, Zagwijn presented his inaugural lecture, entitled Interglacialen (‘Interglacials’) on 20 March 1991 (Zagwijn, Reference Zagwijn1991a). The new building was opened in 1992, coinciding with Zagwijn’s retirement from the Geological Survey, but he worked a further year at the university to finish several projects. During his four years of professorship Zagwijn developed climate reconstructions of the last two interglacial periods, the Eemian and Holocene (Zagwijn Reference Zagwijn1994, Reference Zagwijn1996).

Professor Zagwijn as an Emeritus

In 1993, on the occasion of Zagwijn’s retirement from Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, an international symposium was organised in the Royal Academy of Sciences building. In a special issue of Mededelingen van de Rijks Geologische Dienst, entitled Neogene and Quaternary Geology of North-West Europe; Contribution on the occasion of Waldo H. Zagwijn’s retirement, 34 papers written by 67 of his colleagues were published (Herngreen & Van der Valk, Reference Herngreen and Van der Valk1995). This special issue also includes a list of the almost 100 publications by Zagwijn (De Jong, Reference De Jong1995).

Zagwijn had decided to end his scientific work after retirement. He devoted his time to his family, to travelling and to his hobbies. In 2004 he was hospitalised and needed a period of convalescence. About ten years after this his mental health deteriorated and he spent his last year in a nursing home, where he died. Zagwijn was cremated after a funeral with only family members present.

We remember Waldo Zagwijn as an eminent, erudite and modest scientist with a fabulous memory for detail. He had a remarkable ability to develop an image in time and space of the Netherlands below the surface. He developed early understanding of the Pliocene and Quaternary palaeogeographical, geological and climatological developments of Western Europe, and the Netherlands in particular. He is the instigator and architect of the chrono- and climate stratigraphy of Western Europe.

Acknowledgements

This paper is an abridged version of an obituary in Dutch published at the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (KNAW). H.H. thanks Noord-Hollands Archief (Haarlem) for permission to consult Zagwijn’s personal archive, and also thanks Mrs Zagwijn and Jan de Jong for interviews, Phil Gibbard and Thijs van Kolfschoten for helpful correspondence, and Jean-Pierre Suc and co-authors for their informative paper about Zagwijn’s work in southern Europe. Kim Cohen is thanked for constructing the stratigraphic chart and his useful comments. Jeroen Schokker is thanked for improving a final draft. We thank Nicolas Broadbridge for improving the English text.

References

Berendsen, H.J.A. & Stouthamer, E., 2001. Palaeogeographic development of the Rhine-Meuse delta, the Netherlands. Van Gorcum (Assen).Google Scholar
Birks, H.J.B. & Berglund, B.E., 2017. One hundred years of Quaternary pollen analysis 1916-2016. Vegetation History Archaeobotany 27(2): 271309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busschers, F.S., 2008. Unravelling the Rhine. PhD Thesis. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (Amsterdam), Geology of the Netherlands 1, TNO & Geological Survey of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.M. & Gibbard, P.L., 2019. Global chronostratigraphical correlation table for the last 2.7 million years, version 2018 QI-500. Quaternary International 500: 2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K.M., Dambrink, R., De Bruijn, R., Marges, V.C., Erkens, G., Pierik, H.J., Koster, K., Stafleu, J., Schokker, J. & Hijma, M.P., 2017a. Mapping buried Holocene landscapes: past lowland environments, palaeoDEMs and preservation in GIS. In: Lauwerier, et al. (eds): Knowledge for informed choices. Netherlands Archeological Reports 55. Rijksdienst Cultureel Erfgoed (Amersfoort): 7395.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.M., Dambrink, R., De Bruijn, R., Schokker, J. & Hijma, M.P., 2017b. Vervaardiging van hoogtemodellen en landschapskaarten naar periode en diepte voor archeologisch gebruik in Holoceen-afgedekte delen van Nederland. Deltares Reports 1210450-000-BGS-0012.Google Scholar
De Jong, J., 1988. Climatic variability during the past three million years, as indicated by vegetational evolution in northwest Europe and with emphasis on data from The Netherlands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B318: 603617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, J., 1995. At the retirement of Prof. Dr. W.H. Zagwijn: review of his work and bibliography. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 92: 1319.Google Scholar
De Ridder, N.A. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1962. A mixed Rhine-Meuse deposit of Holsteinian age from the south-eastern part of The Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 41: 125130.Google Scholar
Gibbard, P.L., West, R.G., Zagwijn, W.H., Balson, P.S., Burger, A.W., Funnell, B.M., Jeffrey, D.H., De Jong, J., Van Kolfschoten, T., Lister, A.M., Meijer, T., Norton, P.E.P., Preece, R.C., Rose, J., Stuart, A.J., Whiteman, C.A. & Zalasiewicz, J.A., 1991. Early and Early Middle Pleistocene correlations in the southern North Sea basin. Quaternary Science Reviews 10: 2352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, P.L., Head, M.J. & Walker, M.J.C., 2010. Formal ratification of the Quaternary System/Period and the Pleistocene Series/Epoch with a base at 2.58 Ma. Journal of Quaternary Science 25: 96102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M.J. & Gibbard, P.L. (eds), 2005. Early-Middle Pleistocene transitions: an overview and recommendation for the defining boundary. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 247(1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herngreen, G.F.W. & Van der Valk, L. (eds), 1995. Neogene and Quaternary geology of North-West Europe. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 52: 1510.Google Scholar
Hoek, W.Z., 1997a. Palaeogeography of Lateglacial vegetations:– aspects of Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation, abiotic landscape, and climate in the Netherlands. PhD Thesis, Volume I, Netherlands Geographical Studies (Utrecht–Amsterdam) 230: 160 pp.Google Scholar
Hoek, W.Z., 1997b. Atlas to Palaeogeography of Lateglacial vegetations: maps of Lateglacial and early Holocene landscape and vegetation in the Netherlands, with an extensive review of available palynological data. PhD Thesis, Volume II, Netherlands Geographical Studies (Utrecht–Amsterdam) 231: 176 pp.Google Scholar
Jelgersma, S., De Jong, J., Zagwijn, W.H. & Van Regteren Altena, J.F., 1970. The coastal dunes of the western Netherlands: geology, vegetational history and archaeology. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst (Nieuwe Serie) 21: 93167.Google Scholar
Lisiecky, L.E. & Raymo, M.E., 2005. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20: PA1003, 1–17.Google Scholar
Paepe, R. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1972. Possibilités de corrélation des dépôts Weichseliens de la Belgique et des Pays-Bas. Bulletin Association Francaise pour l’étude du Quaternaire 1: 5969.Google Scholar
Pannekoek, A.J. (ed.), 1956. Geological history of the Netherlands: explanation to the General Geological Map of The Netherlands on the scale of 1:200,000. Government Printing and Publishing Office (The Hague): 147 pp.Google Scholar
Peeters, J., Busschers, F.S., Stouthamer, E., Bosch, J.H.A., Van den Berg, M.W., Wallinga, J., Versendaal, A.J., Bunnik, F.P.M. & Middelkoop, H., 2016. Sedimentary architecture and chronostratigraphy of a late Quaternary incised-valley fill: a case study of the late Middle and Late Pleistocene Rhine system in the Netherlands. Quaternary Science Reviews 131: 211236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penck, A. & Brückner, E., 1901–1909. Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter. Tauchnitz (Leipzig): 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Pierik, H.J., Cohen, K.M. & Stouthamer, E., 2016. A new GIS approach for reconstructing and mapping dynamic late Holocene coastal plain palaeogeography. Geomorphology 270: 5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, N.J. & Opdyke, N.D., 1976. Oxygen isotope and paleomagnetic stratigraphy of Pacific core V28-239, Late Pliocene to Latest Pleistocene. Geological Society of America Memoir 145: 449464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suc, J.-P. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1983. Plio-Pleistocene correlations between the northwestern Mediterranean region and northwestern Europe according to recent biostratigraphic and palaeoclimatic data. Boreas 12: 153166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suc, J.-P., Popescu, S.-M., Bertini, A., Head, M.J., Gibbard, P.L. & Diniz, F., 2018. The pioneering contributions and legacy of Waldo H. Zagwijn (1928-2018). Alpine and Mediterranean Quaternary 31: iiiviii.Google Scholar
Van der Hammen, T., 1974. In memoriam prof. dr. I.M. van der Vlerk. Geologie en Mijnbouw 53: 241243.Google Scholar
Van der Hammen, T., Wijmstra, T.A. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1971. The floral record of the Late Cenozoic of Europe. In: Turekian, K.K. (ed.): Late Cenozoic glacial ages. Yale University Press (New Haven–London): 391424.Google Scholar
Van der Hammen, T., Maarleveld, G.C., Vogel, J.C. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1967. Stratigraphy, climatic succession radiocarbon dating of the Last Glacial in The Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 46: 7995.Google Scholar
Van der Maarel, E. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1971. Historic and dynamic aspects of coastal dune vegetations in the Netherlands. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 20: 173182.Google Scholar
Van der Meulen, M.J., Doornenbal, J.C., Gunnink, J.L., Stafleu, J., Schokker, J., Vernes, R.W., Van Geer, F.C., Van Gessel, S.F., Van Heteren, S., Van Leeuwen, R.J.W., Bakker, M.A.J., Bogaard, P.J.F., Busschers, F.S., Griffioen, J., Gruijters, S.H.L.L., Kiden, P., Schroot, B.M., Simmelink, H.J., Van Berkel, W.O., Van der Krogt, R.A.A., Westerhoff, W.E. & Van Daalen, T.M., 2013. 3D geology in a 2D country: perspectives for geological surveying in the Netherlands. Journal Geosciences 92: 217241.Google Scholar
Van der Vlerk, I.M. & Florschütz, F., 1950. Nederland in het ijstijdvak. De geschiedenis van flora, fauna en klimaat toen aap en mammoet ons land bewoonden. De Haan (Utrecht): 287 pp.Google Scholar
Van Montfrans, H.M., 1971. Paleomagnetic dating in the North Sea basin. PhD Thesis. University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Van Staalduinen, C.J., Van Adrichem-Bogaert, H.A., Bless, M.J.M., Doppert, J.W.C., Harsveldt, H.M., Oele, E., Van Montfrans, H.M., Wermuth, R.A. & Zagwijn, W.H., 1979. The geology of the Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 31: 949.Google Scholar
Vos, P.C., 2015. Origin of the Dutch coastal landscape: long-term landscape evolution of the Netherlands during the Holocene described and visualized in national, regional and local palaeogeographical map series. PhD Thesis. University of Utrecht & Barkhuis (Groningen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, P.C., Bazelmans, L., Weerts, H.J.T. & Van der Meulen, M.J. (eds), 2011. Atlas van Nederland in het Holoceen. Bert Bakker (Amsterdam): 94 pp.Google Scholar
Vos, P.C. & De Vries, S., 2013. 2e generatie palaeogeografische kaarten van Nederland (versie 2.0). Deltares, Utrecht & Rijksdienst Cultureel Erfgoed (Amersfoort).Google Scholar
Westerhoff, W.E., 2009. Stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution: the lower Rhine-Meuse system during the Late Pliocene and Early Pleistocene (southern North Sea basin). PhD Thesis. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (Amsterdam), Geology of the Netherlands 2, TNO & Geological Survey of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Westhoff, V., Bakker, P.A., Van Leeuwen, C.G. & Van der Voo, E.E., 1971. Wilde planten; flora en vegetatie in onze natuurgebieden. Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nerderland (Amsterdam): 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Woillard, G.M. & Mook, W.G., 1982. Carbon-14 dates at Grande Pile: correlation of land and sea chronologies. Science 215: 159161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolderink, H.A.G., Kasse, C., Cohen, K.M., Hoek, W.Z. & Van Balen, R.T., 2019. Spatial and temporal variations in river terrace formation, preservation and morphology in the Lower Meuse Valley, the Netherlands. Quaternary Research 91: 548569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1952. Pollenanalytische Untersuchungen einer spätglacialen Seeablagerung aus Tirol. Geologie en Mijnbouw 14: 235239.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1956. Zum heutigen Stand der Pollenanalytischen Untersuchungen des Pleistozäns in den Niederlanden. Geologie en Mijnbouw (Nieuwe Serie) 18: 426427.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1957. Vegetation, climate and time-correlations in the Early Pleistocene of Europe. Geologie en Mijnbouw (Nieuwe Serie) 19: 233244.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1960. Aspects of the Pliocene and early Pleistocene vegetation of the Netherlands. PhD Thesis. Leiden University (Leiden) & Mededelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Serie C-III-1(5): 178.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1961. Vegetation, climate and radiocarbon datings in the Late Pleistocene of the Netherlands. Part 1: Eemian and Early Weichselian. Mededelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Nieuwe Serie 14: 1545.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1963a. Pollen-analytic investigations in the Tiglian of the Netherlands. Mededelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Nieuwe Serie 16: 4972.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1963b. Pleistocene stratigraphy in the Netherlands based on changes in vegetation and climate. Verhandelingen Koninklijk Nederlands Geologisch Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap, Geologische Serie 21: 173196.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1965. Pollen-analytic correlations in the coastal barrier deposits near The Hague (The Netherlands). Mededelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Nieuwe Serie 17: 8388.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1969. Geologie en vegetatiegeschiedenis van de Nederlandse kustduinen. Koninklijke Maatschappij voor Natuurkunde ‘Diligentia’, Den Haag, Jaarboek 1968-69: 167176.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1971. Vegetational history of the coastal dunes in the western Netherlands. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 20: 174182.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1973. Pollenanalytic studies of Holsteinian and Saalian beds in the northern Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, Nieuwe Serie 24: 139156.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1974a. The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in western and southern Europe. Boreas 3: 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1974b. Vegetation, climate and radiocarbon datings in the Late Pleistocene of the Netherlands. Part II: Middle Weichselian. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, Nieuwe Serie 25: 101110.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1974c. The palaeogeographic evolution of the Netherlands during the Quaternary. Geologie en Mijnbouw 53: 369385.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1975a. A model-theory for the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary determination, based on past climate changes. In: Saito, LT, Burkle, LH (eds): Late Neogene epoch boundaries. Micropalaeontology, Special Publication 1: 7174.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1975b. De paleogeografische ontwikkeling van Nederland in de laatste drie miljoen jaar. Geografisch Tijdschrift 9: 181201 (with 12 palaeogeographical maps).Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1978. A macroflora of Holsteinian age from the northern part of the Netherlands. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 26: 243248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1979. Early and middle Pleistocene coast lines in the southern North Sea basin. In: Oele, E., Schüttenhelm, R.T.E. & Wiggers, A.J. (eds): The Quaternary history of the North Sea. Symposia Universitatis Upsaliensis annum quingentesium celebrantis, Book 2 (Uppsala): 3142.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1982. Het begin van het IJstijdvak. Verslag Afdeling Natuurkunde 91: 5458.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1983. Sea-level changes in the Netherlands during the Eemian. Geologie en Mijnbouw 62: 437450.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1984. The formation of the Younger Dunes of the west coast of the Netherlands (AD 1000–1600). Geologie en Mijnbouw 63: 259268.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1985. An outline of the Quaternary stratigraphy of the Netherlands. Geologie en Mijnbouw 64: 1724.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1986. Nedearland in het Holoceen. Geologie van Nederland, deel 1, Haarlem/Den Haag: 46 pp.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1989a. Vegetation and climate during warmer intervals in the Late Pleistocene of Western and Central Europe. Quaternary International 3–4: 5767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1989b. The Netherlands during the Tertiary and the Quaternary: a case history of Coastal Lowland evolution. Geologie en Mijnbouw 68: 107120.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1991a. Interglacialen. Oratie, Faculteit der Aardwetenschappen, 20 maart 1991. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1991b. Lectures ‘Vegetatiegeschiedenis van het Europese Kwartair’. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (Amsterdam): 6 volumes.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1992. The beginning of the ice age in Europe and its major subdivisions. Quaternary Science Reviews 11: 583591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1994. Reconstruction of climate change during the Holocene in western and central Europe based on pollen records of indicator species. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 3: 6588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1996. An analysis of Eemian climate in Western and Central Europe. Quaternary Science Reviews 15: 451469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H. & De Jong, J., 1984. Die Interglaziale von Bavel und Leerdam und ihre stratigraphische Stellung im niederländischen Früh-Pleistozän. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 37: 155169.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H. & Menke, B., 1971. Arbeitsgruppe fur Biostratigraphie des Pleistozäns im nordeuropäischen Vereisungsgebiet. Zusammenkunft vom 25-27.5.1971 in Haarlen. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 22: 192195.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H. & Paepe, R., 1968. Die Stratigraphie der weichselzeitlichen Ablagerungen der Niederlande und Belgiens. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 19: 129146.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H. & Suc, J.-P., 1984. Palynostratigraphie du Plio-Pléistocene d’Europe et de Méditerranée nord-occidentales: corrélations chronostratigraphiques. Histoire de le végétations et du climat. Paléobiologie Continentale 14: 475483.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., Van Montfrans, H.M. & Zandstra, J.G., 1971. Subdivision of the ‘Cromerian’in the Netherlands: pollen-analysis, paleomagnetism and sedimentary petrology. Geologie en Mijnbouw 50: 4158.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H. & Van Staalduinen, C.J., 1975. Toelichting bij Geologische overzichtskaarten van Nederland. Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 134 pp.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H. & Zonneveld, J.I.S., 1956. The interglacial of Westerhoven. Geologie en Mijnbouw (Nieuwe Serie) 18: 3746.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Waldo Zagwijn in his favourite surroundings, studying plant remains in the Belfeld Clay in a pit at Maalbeek, 1992 (after de Jong, 1995).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The early and middle Pleistocene division nomenclature developed by Zagwijn (after Cohen & Gibbard 2019). Courtesy of K. Cohen.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Waldo Zagwijn interviewed on the occasion of his appointment at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in 1989. Courtesy of mrs. R. Zagwijn-Sjoerds and collection photo press agency De Boer, Haarlem.

You have Access
Open access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Waldo Heliodoor Zagwijn (1928–2018): the instigator and architect of European chronostratigraphy
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Waldo Heliodoor Zagwijn (1928–2018): the instigator and architect of European chronostratigraphy
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Waldo Heliodoor Zagwijn (1928–2018): the instigator and architect of European chronostratigraphy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *