Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:30:18.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dallasaurus turneri, a new primitive mosasauroid from the Middle Turonian of Texas and comments on the phylogeny of Mosasauridae (Squamata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2016

G.L. Bell Jr.  and
M.J. Polcyn
G.L. Bell Jr.*
Affiliation:
Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Salt Flat, Texas 79847, USA
M.J. Polcyn
Affiliation:
Shuler Museum of Paleontology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275, USA
*
* Corresponding author. Email: gbell@dellcity.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new genus and species of primitive-limbed mosasauroid, Dallasaurus turneri, from the Middle Turonian (∼92 Ma) of north-central Texas, is described on the basis of two incomplete skeletons. The new taxon retains plesiomorphic characters such as facultatively terrestrial limbs (plesiopedal) but also exhibits certain characters shared with derived mosasaurs of the subfamily Mosasaurinae. In phylogenetic analysis, the new taxon reconstructs as the basal member of that clade. Other plesiopedal taxa previously included in the family Aigialosauridae reconstruct in basal positions within three different, major clades that include members that achieved the derived (hydropedal) fin-like limb condition. In addition, Opetiosaurus and Aigialosaurus reconstruct as successive outgroup taxa to all other mosasauroids, thereby demonstrating the paraphyletic nature of the current concept of Aigialosauridae. Interpretation of our phylogenetic analysis suggests that three different lineages of mosasauroids independently achieved the derived mosasaur body plan, including fully marine limb modifications culminating in the development of flippers or paddle-like appendages. The inclusion of plesiopedal forms within lineages of well-established hydropedal clades requires a reorganisation of our concepts of Mosasauridae to include these basal forms. In order to avoid continued use of the paraphyletic taxon ‘Aigialosauridae’ as currently defined, we recommend ‘Aigialosauridae’ as a formal taxonomic name be used only for inclusion of Aigialosaurus dalmaticus and potential members of its own independent lineage. This also avoids the implicit polyphyletic use of ‘Mosasauridae’. Additionally, the diagnosis of Mosasauridae should be modified to exclude limb characters that discriminate between more terrestrial versus more aquatic adaptations.

Keywords

Aigialosauridaeaquatic adaptationDallas aigialosaurMosasaursCretaceousTuronian
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 84 , Special Issue 3: Proceedings of the First Mosasaur Meeting , September 2005 , pp. 177 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2005

References

Adkins, W.S., 1928. Handbook of Texas Cretaceous fossils. University of Texas Bulletin 1838: 1–303.Google Scholar
Bardet, N., Pereda Suberbiola, X. & Jalil, N.-E., 2003. A new mosasauroid (Squamata) from the Late Cretaceous (Turonian) of Morocco. Comptes Rendus Palevol 2: 607–616.Google Scholar
Bell, G.L. Jr., 1993. A phylogenetic analysis of Mosasauroidea (Squamata). University of Texas at Austin, Texas: 293 pp. (unpubl. PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Bell, G.L. Jr., 1995. Middle Turonian (Cretaceous) mosasauroids from Big Bends National Park, Texas, In: Santucci, V.L. & McClelland, L. (eds): National Park Service Paleontological Research, Technical Report NPS/NRP01NRTR-95/16, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service (Denver, Colorado): 118 pp.Google Scholar
Bell, G.L. Jr., 1997. A phylogenetic revision of North American and Adriatic Mosasauroidea. In: Callaway, J.M. & Nicholls, E.L. (eds): Ancient marine reptiles. Academic Press (San Diego): 293–332.Google Scholar
Bell, G.L. Jr. & Polcyn, M.J., 1995. A new basal mosasauroid from the Arcadia Park Member of the Eagle Ford Shale (Late Middle Turonian) near Dallas, Texas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15 (Suppl. to 3): 18A.Google Scholar
Bell, G.L. Jr. & VonLoh, J.P., 1998. New records of Turonian mosasauroids from the western United States. In: Martin, J.E., Hogenson, J.W. & Benton, R.C. (eds): Partners preserving our past, planning our future. Dakoterra 5: 15–28.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M.W., Carroll, R.L. & Kaiser, H., 1995. The pectoral girdle and forelimb of Carsosaurus marchesetti (Aigialosauridae), with a preliminary phylogenetic analysis of mosasauroids and varanoids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15: 516–531.Google Scholar
Calligaris, R., 1988. I rettili fossili degli ‘Strati calcariei ittilitici di comeno’ e dell’isola di Lesina. Atti del Museo civico di Storia naturale Trieste 41: 85–125.Google Scholar
Carroll, R.L. & DeBraga, M., 1992. Aigialosaurs: mid-Cretaceous varanoid lizards. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12: 66–86.Google Scholar
DeBraga, M. & Carroll, R.L., 1993. The origin of mosasaurs as a model of macroevolutionary patterns and processes. Evolutionary Biology 27: 245–322.Google Scholar
Hattin, D.E., 1962. Stratigraphy of the Carlile Shale (Upper Cretaceous) in Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 156: 1–155.Google Scholar
Hill, R.T., 1901. Geography and geology of the Black and Grand Prairies, Texas. United States Geological Survey, Report 21(7): 1–666.Google Scholar
Jacobs, L.L., Ferguson, K., Polcyn, M.J. & Rennison, C., 2005a. Cretaceous δ13C stratigraphy and the age of dolichosaurs and early mosasaurs. In: Schulp, A.S. & Jagt, J.W.M., (eds): Proceedings of the First Mosasaur Meeting.Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 84: 257–268.Google Scholar
Jacobs, L.L., Polcyn, K.J., Taylor, L.H. & Ferguson, K., 2005b. Sea-surface temperatures and palaeoenvironments of dolichosaurs and early mosasaurs. In: Schulp, A.S. & Jagt, J.W.M., (eds): Proceedings of the First Mosasaur Meeting. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 84: 269–281.Google Scholar
Kornhuber, A.G., 1873. Über einen neuen fossilen Saurier aus Lesina. Abhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen geologischen Reichsanstalt zu Wien 5: 75–90.Google Scholar
Kornhuber, A.G., 1893. Carsosaurus marchesetti, ein neuer fossiler Lacertilier aus den Kreideschichten des Karstes bei Komen. Abhandlungen der geologischen Reichsanstalt zu Wien 17: 1–15.Google Scholar
Kornhuber, A.G., 1901. Opetiosaurus bucchichi, eine neue fossile Eidechse aus der unteren Kreide von Lesina in Dalmatien. Abhandlungen der geologischen Reichsanstalt zu Wien 17: 1–24.Google Scholar
Kramberger, K.G., 1892. Aigiaiosaurus, eine neue Eidechse aus den Kreideschiefern der Insel Lesina mit Rücksicht auf die bereits beschriebenen Lacertiden von Comen und Lesina. Glasnik huvatskoga naravolosovnoga derstva (Societas historico-matulis croatica) u Zagrebu 7: 74–106.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T., 1992. The tylosaurine mosasaurs (Reptilia, Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Europe and Africa. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 62: 171–194.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T., 1994. The mosasaur ‘Angolasaurus’ bocagei (Reptilia: Mosasauridae) from the Turonian of Angola re-interpreted as the earliest member of the genus Platecarpus. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 68(1/2): 287–282.Google Scholar
Lingham-Soliar, T., 1995. Anatomy and functional morphology of the largest marine reptile known, Mosasaurus hoffmani (Mosasauridae, Reptilia) from the Upper Cretaceous, Upper Maastrichtian of the Netherlands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B347: 155–180.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R.A., 1888. Catalogue of the fossil Reptilia and Amphibia in the British Museum (Natural History), Part 1. Ornithosauria, Crocodilia, Dinosauria, Squamata, Rhynchocephalia and Proterosauria. British Museum (NH) (London): xxviii + 309 pp.Google Scholar
Martin, L.D. & Stewart, J.D., 1977. The oldest (Turonian) mosasaurs from Kansas. Journal of Paleontology 51: 973–975.Google Scholar
Mulder, E.W.A. & Mai, H., 2003. Pre-Maastrichtian tetrapods from the Maastrichtian area: the oldest tylosaurine mosasaur (Reptilia: Squamata) from the late Cretaceous of Belgium; Hermann von Meyer (1860) revisited. In: Mulder, E.W.A.On the latest Cretaceous tetrapods from the Maastrichtian type area. Publicaties van het Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg 44: 19–22.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1851. A monograph on the Reptilia of the Cretaceous formations. Palaeontographical Society, London. 5: 1–118.Google Scholar
Páramo, M.E., 1994. Posición sistemática de un reptil marino con base en los restos fósiles encontrados en capas del Cretácico superior en Yaguara (Huila). Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias exactas, físicas y naturales 19: 63–80.Google Scholar
Páramo, M.E., 2000. Yaguarasaurus columbianus (Reptilia, Mosasauridae), a primitive mosasaur from the Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) of Columbia. Historical Biology 14: 121–131.Google Scholar
Polcyn, M.J. & Bell, G.L. Jr., 1996. A complete skull of a new mosasauroid from the Arcadia Park Member of the Eagle Ford Shale (Late Middle Turonian) near Dallas, Texas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16 (Supplement to 3): 58A.Google Scholar
Polcyn, M.J. & Bell, G.L., 2005. Russellosamus coheni n. gen., n. sp., a 92 million-year-old mosasaur from Texas (USA), and the definition of the parafamily Russellosaurina. In: Schulp, A.S. & Jagt, J.W.M., (eds): Proceedings of the First Mosasaur Meeting. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 84: 321–333.Google Scholar
Polcyn, M.J., Tchernov, E. & Jacobs, L.L., 1999. The Cretaceous biogeography of the eastern Mediterranean with a description of a new basal mosasauroid from ‘Ein Yabrud, Israel. In: Tomida, T., Rich, T. & Vickers-Rich, P. (eds): Proceedings of the Second Gondwanan Dinosaur Symposium. National Science Museum Tokyo, Monographs 15: 259–290.Google Scholar
Polcyn, M.J., Tchernov, E. & Jacobs, L.L., 2003. Haasiasaurus gen. nov., a new generic name for the basal mosasauroid Haasia Polcyn et al., 1999. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 476.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A., 1967. Systematics and morphology of American mosasaurs. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University 23: 1–241.Google Scholar
Stewart, J.D. & Bell, G.L. Jr., 1994. North America’s oldest mosasaurs are teleosts. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science 441: 1–9.Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates (Sunderland, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
Telles Antunes, M., 1964. 0 Neocretácico e o Cenozóico do litoral de Angola. Junta de Investigaçõ do Ultramar (Lisboa): 255 pp.Google Scholar
VonLoh, J.P. & Bell, G.L. Jr., 1998. Fossil reptiles from the Late Cretaceous Greenhorn Formation (Late Cenomanian-Middle Turonian) of the Black Hills region, South Dakota. In: Martin, J.E., Hogenson, J.W. & Benton, R.C. (eds): Partners preserving our past, planning our future. Dakoterra 5: 29–38.Google Scholar
Woodward, A.S., 1905. Note on some portions of mosasaurian jaws obtained by Mr. G.E. Dibley from the Middle Chalk of Cuxton, Kent. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 19: 185–187.Google Scholar