Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:17:35.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Localness and Mobility in Belarusian Nationalism: The Tactic of Tuteishaść*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Alexander Pershai*
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Theory and Criticism, University of Western Ontario, Somerville House, UWO, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada. Email: apershai@uwo.ca

Extract

Every nation has its own ways of telling its national story. Such narratives attempt to incorporate and explain the terms of a nation's history, culture, language, territory, economic welfare, and its citizens' sense of belonging. Some national stories are more complicated than others and require specific terminology to describe their nation and its “other.” Belarus is one of these complicated cases. Belarusian national character is often defined by the concept of tuteishaść, or “localness,” by which the people of Belarus identify themselves in relation to other nations and countries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamovich, Anthony. Opposition to Sovetization in Belorussian Literature (1917–1957). Munich: Institut zur Erforschung der UdSSR, 1958.Google Scholar
Brown, N. Anthony. “Language and Identity in Belarus.” Language Policy 4, no. 3 (2005): 311–31.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bulhakaŭ, Valerka. “Moi Bahushevich: Dyialektyka klasichnaha tesktu.” Frahmenty 4 (1998) <http://knihi.com/frahmenty/4bulhakaw.htm> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
Chernyavskaya, Yulia. “Piat’ paradoksov natsionalnogo samosoznaniya belorusov.” Belintellectuals.com: Gazieta intellektual'nogo soobshchiestva Belarusi, 4 January 2006 <http://belintellectuals.eu/discussions/?id=88> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Ermalovich, Mikola. Pa śliadakh adnaho mifa. Miensk: Navuka i tekhnika, 1991, <http://knihi.com/jermalovic/mif.html> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. “Between Speech and Silence: The Problematics of Research on Language and Gender.” In Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, edited by Di Leonardo, Michaela. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Gapova, Elena. “On Nation, Gender, and Class Formation in Belarus … and Elsewhere in the Post-Soviet World.” Nationalities Papers 30, no. 4 (2002): 639–63.Google Scholar
Gapova, Elena. “O politicheskoi ekonomii ‘natsionalnogo yazyka’ v Belarusi.” Ab Imperio, no. 3 (2005): 404441.Google Scholar
Goujon, Alexandra. “Language, Nationalism, and Populism in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27, no. 4 (1999): 661–66.Google Scholar
Ignatoŭski, Usevalad. Karotki narys gistoryi Belarusi. Minsk: Belaruś, 1992.Google Scholar
Ioffe, Grigory. “Understanding Belarus: Belarusian Identity.” Europe-Asia Studies 55, no. 8 2003a): 1241–72.Google Scholar
Ioffe, Grigory. “Understanding Belarus: Questions of Language.” Europe-Asia Studies 55, no. 7 2003b): 1009–47.Google Scholar
Kudzinienka, Andrei, dir. Mysterium Occupation (motion picture). Belarus: Navigator, 2003.Google Scholar
Marples, David R.National Awakening and National Consciousness in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27, no. 4 (1999): 565–56.Google Scholar
Marples, David R. “Europe's Last Dictatorship: The Roots and Perspectives of Authoritarianism in ‘White Russia.”’ Europe-Asia Studies 57, no. 6 (2005): 895908.Google Scholar
Nasuta, Andrei. “Kharyzma tuteishaści.” Belintellectuals.com: Gazieta intellektual'nogo soobshchiestva Belarusi, 28 November 2005, <http://belintellectuals.eu/discussions/?id=78> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Pershai, Alexander. “Questioning the Hegemony of the Nation State in Belarus: Production of Intellectual Discourses as Production of Resources.” Nationalities Papers 34, no. 5 (2006): 623–62.Google Scholar
Rudkoŭski, Piotra. “Tuteishyia—byli, yość i buduć.” Novaya Evropa, 7 January 2007 <http://n-europe.eu/content/?p=1056> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
Shevtsov, Yuri. Ob'yediniennaya natsyia: fienomien Bielarusi. Moscow: Evropa, 2005.Google Scholar
Shimov, Yaroslav. “Belorussia: vostochnoevropeiskiy paradoks.” Nieprikosnoviennyi Zapas, no. 47 (2006), <http://www.nz-online.ru/index.phtml?aid=80011752> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
Shparaga, Volga. “Być belaruskai, al'bo Pa-za miezhami tuteishaśći.” Novaya Evropa, 8 April 2007, <http://n-europe.eu/content/?p=1421> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
Sikorska-Kulesza, Jolanta. “Kobieta w rodzine drobnoszlacheckej w XIX wieku. Litwa i Białoruś.” In Kobieta i spoleczeństwo na ziemiach polskich w XIX wieku, edited by Żarnowska, Anna and Szwarc, Andrzej. Warsaw: Instytut Historyczny Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 1995.Google Scholar
Smalianchuk, Alés. Krajovaść u belaruskai i polskai historyi, 13 September 2001, <http://www.library.by/shpargalka/belarus/belarus/001/bel-037.htm> (accessed 3 July 2007).+(accessed+3+July+2007).>Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy. The Reconstruction of Nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569–1999. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Vakar, Nicholas P. Belorussia: The Making of a Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Weeks, Theodore. “‘Us’ or ‘Them'? Belarusians and Official Russia, 1863–1914.” Nationalities Papers 31, no. 2 (2003): 211–21.Google Scholar
Zaprudnik, Jan. Historical Dictionary of Belarus. Lanham, MD and London: Scarecrow Press 1998.Google Scholar