Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T03:22:26.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Employment Effects of the ‘New Economy’. A Comparison of the European Union and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Bart van Ark
Affiliation:
University of Groningen and The Conference Board
Robert Inklaar
Affiliation:
University of Groningen and The Conference Board
Robert H. McGuckin
Affiliation:
University of Groningen and The Conference Board
Marcel P. Timmer*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen and The Conference Board

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the trends in labour productivity and employment growth at industry level in the European Union and the United States during the 1990s. We analyse relationships for groups of industries, i.e. industries that produce ICT products and services, those that invest strongly in ICT, and those that make less intensive use of ICT. The main findings are that the inverse relationship between employment and productivity growth has been much more prominent in manufacturing industries than in services industries. Secondly, during the 1990s, this relationship has turned positive in many industries, in particular in ICT-producing industries and in ICT-using industries in the service sector. Finally, the employment-reducing effects of productivity growth have remained considerably stronger in Europe than in the US.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based on a study by Bart van Ark, Robert Inklaar and Robert H. McGuckin (2002a).

References

Acemoglu, D. (2002), ‘Technical change, inequality, and the labor market’, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, pp. 772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ark, B. van, Inklaar, R. and McGuckin, R.H. (2002a), ‘“Changing Gear”, productivity, ICT and service industries: Europe and the United States’, GGGD Research Memorandum, no. GD-60, downloadable from: www.eco.rug.nl/ggdc/pub/online/gd60(online).pdfGoogle Scholar
Ark, B. van, Melka, J.Mulder, N., Timmer, M.P. and Ypma, G., (2002b), ‘ICT investment and growth accounts for the European Union, 1980-2000’, GGGD Research Memorandum, no. GD-56, downloadable from: www.eco.rug.nl/ggdc/pub/online/gd56(online).pdfGoogle Scholar
Baily, M.N. (2002), ‘Distinguished lecture on economics in government: the new economy: post mortem or second wind?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 2, pp. 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W.J. (1967), ‘Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis’, The American Economic Review, 57, 3, pp. 415426.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (2000), ‘Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 4, pp. 2348, Fall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edquist, C., Hommen, L. and McKeyvey, M. (2001), Innovation and Employment. Process versus Product Innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Isern, J. and Rios, M. (2002), ‘Facing disconnection: hard choices for Europe's telecos’, The McKinsey Quarterly, 1.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (2001), ‘Information technology and the US economy’, American Economic Review, 91, 1, pp. 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuckin, R.H. and van Ark, B. (2003), Performance 2002, Productivity, Employment, and Income in the World's Economies, New York, The Conference Board.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute (2001), US Productivity Growth 1995-2000, Understanding the Contribution of Information Technology Relative To Other Factors, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute (2002), Reaching Higher Productivity Growth in France and Germany, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Naastepad, C.W.N. and Kleinknecht, A. (2002), ‘The Dutch productivity slowdown: the culprit at last?’, mimeo, Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, G., Bassanini, A., Ernst, E., Jean, S., Santiago, P. and Swaim, P. (2001), ‘Product and labour markets interaction in OECD countries’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 312, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1994a), The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis and Strategy, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1994b), The OECD Jobs Study, Evidence and Explanations, Part I, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1994c), The OECD Jobs Study, Evidence and Explanations, Part II, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1995), The OECD Jobs Study: Investment, Productivity and Employment, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1996a), Technology, Productivity and Job Creation - Vol. I: Highlights, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (1996b), Technology, Productivity and Job Creation - Vol. II: Analytical Report, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2001), The New Economy: Beyond the Hype - The OECD Growth Project, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2002), Measuring the Information Economy, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2003), The Sources of Economic Growth, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Oliner, S.D. and Sichel, D.E. (2002), ‘Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going?’, mimeo, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiroh, K.J. (2001), ‘Information technology and the US productivity revival: what do the industry data say?’, American Economic Review (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, P. and Soete, L. (2001), Technology and the Future of European Employment, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett, J.E. (1996), ‘High-tech industry productivity and hedonic price indices’ in OECD Proceedings: Industry Productivity, International Comparisons and Measurement Issues, p. 119142, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Triplett, J.E. and Bosworth, B.P. (2002), ‘“Baumol's Disease” has been cured: IT and multifactor productivity in US services industries’, mimeo.Google Scholar