Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:43:17.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dollars and Deficits - The US Current Account Deficit and its Exchange Rate Consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Extract

In the past three years the US dollar has been declining whilst the US current account deficit has expanded, and these two developments are clearly linked. However, the causes of the decline in the dollar and the solution to the US deficit may not be as closely related as at first may appear. The emergence of a sustained deficit does not automatically necessitate a fall in the exchange rate, and a fall in the exchange rate may not correct such a deficit. Deficits can exist if the currency moves above its sustainable real exchange rate, and a real depreciation can remove such a deficit. Deficits caused by exchange rate movements are likely to be more temporary than those that either emerge for long-term structural reasons or result from structural imbalances in the economy. A structural deficit can be the consequence of low domestic saving or high domestic government borrowing. If domestic investment is very profitable then even high levels of domestic saving may still result in a savings shortfall, and the high returns may induce a structural capital inflow which will produce a sustainable current account deficit as a consequence. All these factors have influenced the increase in the US deficit in the past decade, and it is difficult to see how a correction to the deficit can occur without one of the domestic drivers changing in some way. Here we present a set of simulations using NiGEM to examine the impacts of alternative adjustment scenarios and their global implications. Before adding to the debate about the possible remedies, we will attempt to establish the sources of the current conjuncture, as the alternative adjustment paths for deficits and for the dollar depend on the sources of misalignment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrell, R. and Dury, K. (2000), ‘An evaluation of monetary targeting regimes’, National Institute Economic Review, 174, October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R. and Holland, D. (2004), ‘The dollar, the jobless recovery and technical progress’, National Institute Economic Review, 188.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Holland, D. (2004a), ‘Are current exchange rates sustainable?’, National Institute Economic Review, 187.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Pain, N. (2000), ‘Monetary and fiscal policy in Europe’, National Institute Economic Review, 174, October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalsgaard, T., André, C. and Richardson, P. (2001), ‘Standard shocks in the OECD interlink model’, OECD Economics Department Working paper no. 306.Google Scholar
Erceg, C., Guerrieri, L. and Gust, C. (2004), ‘Sigma: a new open economy model for policy analysis’, US Federal Reserve Board, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Laxton, D., Isazrd, P., Faruqee, H., Prasad, E. and Turtelboom, B. (1998), Multimod Mark III’, Occasional Paper 164, IMF, Washington.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (2004), ‘The unsustainable US current account position revisited’, National Bureau of Economic Research, WP 10869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, O. and Weale, M. (2005), ‘Are we saving enough? The macroeconomics of the savings gap’, National Institute Economic Review, 191, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, L. (2004), ‘The United States and the global adjustment process’, Third Annual Stavros S. Niarchos Lecture, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar