Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:06:41.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A decomposition formula for representations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

George Kempf
George Kempf*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland 21218 U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let H be the Levi subgroup of a parabolic subgroup of a split reductive group G. In characteristic zero, an irreducible representation V of G decomposes when restricted to H into a sum V = ⊕mαWα where the Wα’s are distinct irreducible representations of H. We will give a formula for the multiplicities mα. When H is the maximal torus, this formula is Weyl’s character formula. In theory one may deduce the general formula from Weyl’s result but I do not know how to do this.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 107 , September 1987 , pp. 63 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1987

Footnotes

*

Partially supported by NSF Grant #MPS75-05578.

References

[1] Demazure, M., Desingularisations des variétés de Schubert généralisées, Ann. Ecole Nat. Sup., 7 (1974), 53–88.Google Scholar
[2] Kempf, G., Linear systems on homogeneous space, Ann. of Math., 103 (1976), 557–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Kempf, G., The Grothendieck-Cousin Complex of an Induced Representation, Adv. in Math., 29 (1978), 310–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Mehta, V. B. and Ramanathan, A., Frobenius splitting and cohomology vanishing for Schubert varieties, Ann. of Math., 122 (1985), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Mumford, D., Geometric Invariant Theory, Springer, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Ramanathan, A., Schubert varieties are arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay, Invent. Math., 80 (1985), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar