Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:41:50.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Activated Slags as Immobilisation Matrices for ILW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

NB Milestone
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, University of Sheffield, U.K.
Y Bai
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, University of Sheffield, U.K.
C.H. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Building Materials & Engineering, Chongqing University, P.R. China
Y.J. Shi
Affiliation:
Department of Building Materials & Engineering, Chongqing University, P.R. China
X.C. Li
Affiliation:
Yunnan Construction Concrete Co. Ltd, P.R. China
Get access

Abstract

Composite cements where large amounts of blast furnace slag (BFS) replace Portland cement are currently used for immobilisation of ILW. Hydration of BFS is activated by the small amount of OPC present but the amount of reaction that occurs is limited at ambient temperatures. Increasing the temperature increases the hydration of the BFS but large amounts still remain unreacted, leaving a porous matrix where the capillary pores remain filled with a highly alkaline solution. This solution causes corrosion of reactive metals giving rise to expansive reactions and hydrogen release, and it can destroy the structure of zeolites releasing the adsorbed species.

Apart from OPC, BFS hydration can be activated by other compounds such as hydroxides, sulphates, silicates, and calcium aluminate cements. The use of these alternatives gives rise to binders such as ettringite and strätlingite which have a different chemistry where the pore solution has a lower pH. Corrosion of metals does not readily occur in these binders. This may be due to the reduced pH but could also arise from the lack of pore water, as these binders bind more water in their structure so that it is not available for transport of ionic species. This extra water binding also has potential for immobilisation of sludges where high w/s ratios are necessitated by the need to transport the sludge.

This paper will review some of the alternative activators for slag hydration and present experimental results on several systems where slag has been activated with compounds other than OPC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gorce, J.P, and Milestone, NB, Probing the Microstructure and Water Phases in Composite Cement Blends, Cem. Concr. Res. 37 (2007) 310–318 Google Scholar
2 Setiadi, A, Milestone, NB, Hill, J, and Hayes, M, Corrosion of aluminium and magnesium in BFS composite cements, Adv. App. Ceram. 2006 105 (4) 191196 Google Scholar
3 Milestone, NB, “Reactions in cement encapsulated nuclear wastes: need for toolbox of different cement types”, Adv. Appl. Ceram. 105 (1) 1318, 2006 Google Scholar
4 Zhou, Q, Milestone, NB, and Hayes, M, An alternative to Portland cement for waste immobilisation – the calcium sulfoaluminate cement system, J. Hazard. Mat. 136 (2006) 120–129 Google Scholar
5 Glukhovsky, VD, et al., Binder, US Patent 4410365, 1983 Google Scholar
6 Shi, CJ, Wu, X, and Tang, MS, Research on alkali-activated cementitious systems in China: a review, Adv. Cem. Res., 5, (17), 17, (1993)Google Scholar
7 Roy, DM, and Silsbee, MR, Alkali activated cementitious materials: an overview, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1992, 245, pp. 153164.Google Scholar
8 Moranville-Regourd, M in Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete pp 664667. pub Elsevier 2004.Google Scholar
9 Bai, Y, Milestone, NB, and Yang, C, Sodium sulphate activated GGBS/PFA and its potential as a Nuclear Waste Immobilisation matrix, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2005 932 759766.Google Scholar