Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T10:33:56.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultra-thin strain relaxed SiGe buffer layers with 40% Ge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Klara Lyutovich
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Institute of Semiconductor Engineering, Pfaffenwaldring 47, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Erich Kasper
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Institute of Semiconductor Engineering, Pfaffenwaldring 47, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Michael Oehme
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Institute of Semiconductor Engineering, Pfaffenwaldring 47, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Virtual substrates with ultra-thin SiGe strain relaxed buffers have been grown on Si substrates by a method employing point defect supersaturation in the growing layers. A concept of the point defect influence on the strain relaxation and on defect interactions in layers has been proposed. A method is developed to increase the degree of relaxation in sub-100 nm SiGe buffer layers and to provide a smooth surface morphology. Layer growth has been realized by solid source molecular beam epitaxy in a chamber equipped with an in situ monitoring system. One of the growth stages, performed at a very low temperature, serves the generation of point defects. Strain relaxation tunable up to the high degree and a crosshatch-free surface morphology are demonstrated in 40nm thick SiGe buffers which contain 40-45% Ge.

Growth monitoring enables the control of the process window and the layer crystallization by a chosen mechanism.

Virtual substrates produced by the described method were successfully tested in nMODFET structures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Aniel, F., Enciso-Aguilar, M., Giguerre, L., Crozat, P., Adde, R., Mack, T., Seiler, U., Hackbarth, Th., Herzog, H.-J., König, U., Raynor, B., Solid-State Electronics 47, 283 (2003)Google Scholar
2. Kasper, E., Lyutovich, K., Solid-State Electronics (2004), 48, 12571263 (2004)Google Scholar
3. Kasper, E., Lyutovich, K., Bauer, M., Oehme, M., Thin Solid Films 336, 319322 (1998)Google Scholar
4. Bauer, M., Lyutovich, K., Oehme, M., Kasper, E., Herzog, H.-J., Ernst, F., Thin Solid Films 369, 152156 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Matthews, J.W., Blakeslee, A.E., J. Cryst. Growth 29, 126 (1975)Google Scholar
6. People, R., Bean, J.C., Appl Phys Lett 47, 322324 (1985) Erratum: Appl Phys Lett 49, 229 (1986)Google Scholar
7. Perova, T.S., Maurice, R., Moore, R.A., Lyutovich, K., Parry, C.P., Bauer, M., Kasper, E., J. Mater. Sci.: Materials in Electronics 14, 441444 (2003)Google Scholar
8. Lyutovich, K., Bauer, M., Kasper, E., Herzog, H.-J., Perova, T., Maurice, R., Hofer, C., Teichert, C., Mater. Sci. and Engin. B89, 341345 (2002)Google Scholar
9. Kasper, E., Herzog, H.-J., Daembkes, H., Abstreiter, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 56, 347 (1986)Google Scholar
10. Lyutovich, K., Oehme, M., Ernst, F., Euro Phys J. Appl. Phys. (2004), in press.Google Scholar