Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:26:48.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transition Pathway Analysis of Homogeneous Dislocation Nucleation in a Perfect Silicon Crystal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hasan Aftab Saeed
Affiliation:
hasan@fml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp, The University of Tokyo, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan
Satoshi Izumi
Affiliation:
izumi@fml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp, The University of Tokyo, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan
Shotaro Hara
Affiliation:
hara.shotaro@fml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp, The University of Tokyo, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan
Shinsuke Sakai
Affiliation:
sakai@fml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp, The University of Tokyo, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Transition pathway sampling was carried out for homogeneous dislocation nucleation in perfect crystal Si. The sampling algorithm employed was Nudged Elastic Band method. Results obtained were compared with corresponding results for Cu. The stress and activation barrier ranges were found to be much higher for Si than those reported for Cu. The results also showed that while for lower values of resolved shear stress the dislocation embryo approaches that of a perfect dislocation, for higher resolved shear stress values the embryo is far from perfect. That is, the shear displacement of most particles is considerably less than the Burger’s vector. This investigation also demonstrated for the first time that Athermal shear stress for homogeneous dislocation nucleation in Si does not exist, as the crystal undergoes twinning at such high stresses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Izumi, S. and Yip, S., J. Appl. Phys. 104, 033513 (2008).Google Scholar
(2) Boyer, R. D., Ph.D. thesis, MIT (2007).Google Scholar
(3) Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. and Jonsson, H., J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901 (2000).Google Scholar
(4) Zhu, T., Li, J., Samanta, A., Kim, H. G. and Suresh, S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 3031 (2007).Google Scholar
(5) Ogata, S., Li, J., Hirosaki, N., Shibutani, Y. and Yip, S., Phys. Rev. B, 70, 104104 (2004).Google Scholar
(6) Zimmerman, J. A, Kelchner, C. L., Klein, P. A., Hamilton, J. C. and Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 165507 (2001).Google Scholar
(7) Rabier, J. and Demenet, J. L., Scr. Mater. 45, 1259 (2001).Google Scholar