Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:58:55.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Evolution of Deuterium in 4H-Sic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

R. Delamare
Affiliation:
CERI/CNRS, 3A rue de la Férollerie, 45071 Orléans, France
E. Ntsoenzok
Affiliation:
CERI/CNRS, 3A rue de la Férollerie, 45071 Orléans, France
T. Sauvage
Affiliation:
CERI/CNRS, 3A rue de la Férollerie, 45071 Orléans, France
A. Shiryaev
Affiliation:
IRI, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands Institute of Crystallography, Leninsky Pr. 59, 117333 Moscow, Russia
A. van Veen
Affiliation:
IRI, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands
Ch. Dubois
Affiliation:
LPM, INSA, Bât. 502, 69621 Villerbanne, France
Get access

Abstract

4H-SiC samples were implanted at room temperature with 30 keV D+ ions at a dose of 5×1016 D+/cm2. Nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) and secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) measurements were performed to study the deuterium profiles after subsequent annealing at 1000-1250°C for 10min.Also, analytical techniques: RBS/C and thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) were carried out to characterize the evolution of implantation induced defects upon annealing. According to the NRA measurements, no deuterium release was found in the sample annealed at 1000°C. However, increasing the temperature to 1150°C led to a 40% decrease of deuterium content. Similar results about the evolution of D profiles upon annealing have also been obtained by SIMS measurements. In addition, SIMS measurements show that the maximum of the deuterium concentration shifts to the surface. Deuterium desorption at annealing temperatures higher than 1000°C was further confirmed by TDS experiments. Results from RBS/C indicated that during the desorption of deuterium, the implantation induced damage was annealed. These results are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wendler, E., Heft, A., Wesch, W, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. B 141 (1998) 105117;Google Scholar
2. Jiang, W., Weber, W.J., Thevuthasan, S., Nucl. Instr. And Meth. B 166-167 (2000) 374378;Google Scholar
3. Chevallier, J., Mater. Scien. And Engineer. B71 (2000) 6268;Google Scholar
4. Achtziger, N., Hulsen, C., Witthuhn, W., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 210, 395 (1998)Google Scholar
5. Siegele, R., S.Withrow, P., Roth, J. and Scherzer, B., J. Nucl. Mater. 176 & 177 (1990) 1010–17;Google Scholar
6. Nagata, S., Yamaguchi, S., Fujino, Y, J. Nucl. Mater. 128 & 129 (1984) 760 Google Scholar
7. Shiryaev, A., Veen, A. van, Rivera, A., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
8. Bohn, H.G., Mettargue, C.J. and Appleton, B.R., Nucl. Instr. And Meth. 209/210 (1983) 317;Google Scholar
9. Grisolia, J., Cristiano, F., Mauduit, B. De, Jour. Appl. Phys. Vol 87,N° 12 (2000).Google Scholar