Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T22:43:49.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal and Electromigration-Induced Strains in Copper Conductor Lines: X-ray Microbeam Measurements and Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

G. Wang
Affiliation:
gaw2@lehigh.eduLehigh UniversityMaterials Science and EngineeringBethlehem PA18015United States
H. Zhang
Affiliation:
hoz204@lehigh.edu, Lehigh University, Materials Science and Engineering, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, United States
G. S. Cargill III
Affiliation:
gsc3@lehigh.edu, Lehigh University, Materials Science and Engineering, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, United States
C. -K. Hu
Affiliation:
haohu@us.ibm.com, IBM Research, Yorktown Hts., NY, 10598, United States
Y. Ge
Affiliation:
geyz@scorec.rpi.edu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12180, United States
A. Maniatty
Affiliation:
maniatty@scorec.rpi.edu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12180, United States
Get access

Abstract

We have carried out measurements of electromigration-induced strains in copper conductor lines using microbeam energy dispersive x-ray diffraction. Strains developed in random texture damascene Cu 2μm-wide, 0.16 μm-thick conductor lines with TaN liners in low-k dielectric during electromigration at 350°C are much smaller than electromigration-induced strains in (111) fiber texture Al-on-Si, 10μm-wide, SiO2 passivated conductor lines. The reasons for these differences in electromigration behavior may involve the different roles of grain boundary and interface diffusion paths and the different passivation structures and materials for the two types of samples.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wang, P.-C., Cargill, G. S. III, Noyan, I. C., and Hu, C.-K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1296 (1998).Google Scholar
2 Hu, C.-K., Lee, K. Y., Gignac, L., Carruthers, R., Thin Solid Films 308–309, 443 (1997).Google Scholar
3 Korhonen, M. A., Bórgesen, P., Tu, K. N., and Li, Che-Yu, J. Appl. Phys. 73 (8), 3790 (1993).Google Scholar
4 Hau-Riege, Stefan P., and Thompson, Carl V., J. Mater. Res. 15 (8), 1797 (2000).Google Scholar
5 Eshelby, J. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 241, 376 (1957).Google Scholar
6 Hu, C.-K., Rosenberg, R., and Lee, K. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 (20), 294 (1999).Google Scholar