Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T21:08:34.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Stress Tensor Mediation of the Ledge Nucleation/Growth Process with the Surface Reconstruction Process in GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

D. K. Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
T. Halicioglu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
W. A. Tiller
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

A new GaAs semiempirical potential energy function which utilizes both two-body and three-body contributions has been used to evaluate the surface energy and surface stress tensor for the (111) and (001)(As-terminated) surfaces as well as for ledges on the (001) surface. Both surface and ledge reconstruction patterns appear to be driven by stress tensor considerations and a long range ledge-ledge interaction arises via the stress tensor. The impact of this finding on two dimensional cluster formation and nucleation at the growing surface is very substantial.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pearson, E., Takai, T., Halicioglu, T. and Tiller, W.A., J. Crystal Growth 70, 33 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Pearson, E., Computer Modeling of Atomic Interactions with Application to Silicon, Ph.D.Thesis, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 1985 Google Scholar
3. Pearson, E., Halicioglu, T. and Tiller, W.A., Surface Sci., accepted for publication.Google Scholar
4. Takai, T., Halicioglu, T. and Tiller, W.A., Surface Sci. 164. 341 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Biswas, R. and Hamann, D.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 2001 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Stillinger, F. and Weber, T., Phys. Rev. B 32 5262 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56. 632 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Takai, T., Choi, D.K., Halicioglu, T. and Tiller, W.A., submitted to Surface Sci.Google Scholar
9. Takai, T., Choi, D.K., Halicioglu, T. and Tiller, W.A., submitted to Surface Sci.Google Scholar
10. Erkoc, S., Halicioglu, T. and Tiller, W.A., submitted to Surface Sci.Google Scholar
11. Nordsieck, A., Math. Comp. 16 22 (1962).Google Scholar
12. Gear, C.W., Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations, (Prentice-Hall, Princeton, N.J., 1971).Google Scholar
13. Choi, D.K., Takai, T., Erkoc, S., Halicioglu, T. and Tiller, W.A., submitted to J. Crystal Growth.Google Scholar