Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T19:59:44.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subboundary Spacing and Appearance in Laser Zone-Melting Recrystallization of Silicon Onamorphous Substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J.P. Joly
Affiliation:
L.E.T.I. -C.E.A. -I.R.D.I. -Commissariat A lEnergie AtomiqueLETI -CENG -85 X -38041 Grenoble Cedex -FRANCE
J.M. Hode
Affiliation:
L.E.T.I. -C.E.A. -I.R.D.I. -Commissariat A lEnergie AtomiqueLETI -CENG -85 X -38041 Grenoble Cedex -FRANCE
J.C. Castagna
Affiliation:
L.E.T.I. -C.E.A. -I.R.D.I. -Commissariat A lEnergie AtomiqueLETI -CENG -85 X -38041 Grenoble Cedex -FRANCE
Get access

Abstract

Recrystallized silicon films on amorphous substrates are mainly characterized by subgrain boundaries separated by a few microns. Using seedina from the silicon substrate (lateral epitaxy), subboundary free areas adjacent to the seed are achieved in the direction of the beam scanninq. We have demonstrated the large influence of the growth direction and of the thickness of the silicon layer together on the incubation distance and on the spacing of the subboundaries. Surprisingly, a variation of the arowth (scan) velocity of two orders of magnitude (from 1 to 70 cm/s) has no noticeable influence on these narameters. A I × 10 elliptical Ar+ laser beam has been used in these experiments. An interpretation of these results in terms of lateral (step) growth and stress will be given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Maby, E.W., Atwater, H.A., Keigler, A.L., and Johnson, N.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 482 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Geis, M.W., Smith, H.I., Tsaur, B.Y., Fan, J.C.C., Silversmith, D.J., and Mountain, R.W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 2812 (1983)Google Scholar
3. Lan, H.W., Pinizzotto, R.F., and Tash, A.F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 128, 1981 (1981)Google Scholar
4. Rensch, D.B., and Chen, J.Y., IEEE Electron Device Letters EDL 5(2), 38 (1984)Google Scholar
5. Bolling, G.F., and Tiller, W.A., J. Appl. Phys. 31, 2040 (1960)Google Scholar
6. Cahn, J.W., Hillig, W.B., and Sears, G.W., Acta Metallurqica 12, 1421 (1964)Google Scholar
7. Davydov, D.A., Maslov, V.N., Sov. Phys. Cryst. 9, 393 (1965)Google Scholar
8. Pinizzotto, R.F., J. Cryst. Growth 63, 559 (1983)Google Scholar
9. Zorabedian, P., Adar, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 177 (1983)Google Scholar