Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T05:14:08.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure and Forces in Transfection Related Surfactant Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Samuel E. Campbell ,
Chad K. Park ,
Dan D. Lasic  and
Jacob N. Israelachvili
Samuel E. Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Chad K. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Dan D. Lasic
Affiliation:
7512 Birkdale Dr., Newark, CA 94560
Jacob N. Israelachvili*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
*
*To whom correspondence should be addressed
Get access

Abstract

Experiments have been performed on the cationic bilayer and liposome-forming surfactant DODAB, a successful DNA transfection agent. The surface forces apparatus (SFA) was utilized to measure the long-range colloidal and short-range adhesion forces between Langmuir-Blodgett bilayers exposing DODAB in the outer monolayers. Forces were measured in aqueous solutions of varying salt concentrations between 1 and 10 mM, with and without single-stranded DNA added to the solution. These represent the first measurements of the forces between surfactant/DNA assemblies. At low salt concentrations without DNA, the interbilayer forces are repulsive due to their electrostatic interaction, in agreement with DLVO theory. In contrast, in the presence of DNA which adsorbs to the bilayer surfaces, the forces between the bilayers changed to an enhanced and longer ranged repulsive steric-electrostatic interaction. At shorter range. the DNA can be excluded from the gap leading to an enhanced adhesion at contact accompanied by lipid rearrangement.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 489: Symposium K – Materials Science of the Cell , 1997 , 19
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Prasanna, G. and Panda, T., Bioprocess Eng. 16, 261 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Strittmatter, G. and Wegener, D., Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung C 48, 673 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Culver, K. and Blaese, M., TIG 10, 174 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Zhang, L., Li, L., An, Z., Hoffman, R., and Hoffman, G., Bioelectrochem. Bioenergetics 42, 283 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Grill, L., Agro-Food-Ind-High Tech., 20 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Akao, T. and Ito, A., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 213 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Hofland, H., Shepard, L., and Sullivan, S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 7305 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Radler, J., Koltover, I., Salditt, T., and Safinya, C., Science 275, 810 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Lasic, D., Strey, H., Stuart, M., Podgornik, R., and Frederik, P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 832 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Sternberg, B., Sorgi, F., and Huang, L., FEBS Lett. 356, 361 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Fang, Y. and Yang, J., J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 441 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Dan, N., Biophys. J. 71, 1267 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Lasic, D. D., Liposomes in Gene Delivery (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997).Google Scholar
14. Leckband, D., Helm, C., and Israelachvili, J., Biochemistry 32, 1127 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Hueberger, M., Luengo, G., and Israelachvili, J., Langmuir 13, 3839 (1997).Google Scholar
16. Mitrakos, P. and Macdonald, P., Biochemistry 35, 16714 (1996).Google Scholar