Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-28T10:39:19.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Transformations Due to Intermixing During Deposition oF Fe/Pt(001) Epitaxial Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. C. Hufnagel
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
M. C. Kautzky
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
V. Ramaswamy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
A. Leming
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
B. M. Clemens
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
Get access

Abstract

Previous studies of the structure of epitaxial Fe/Pt(001) multilayers have shown that the structure of the Fe layers depends on the Fe layer thickness. For small thicknesses (< 12 Å) the Fe is fcc, while for greater thicknesses (> 22 Å) the Fe has a bcc structure. We speculated that this transition of the Fe structure is a result of intermixing with subsequently deposited Pt. We explore this transition further by examining superlattice satellite peaks around the (111) fundamental reflection, and by using grazing incidence x-ray scattering (GIXS) to examine the structure of epitaxial Fe/Pt(001) multilayers during sputter deposition. The GIXS observations show that the initial growth of Fe is in the bcc structure; thin bcc Fe layers are partially transformed to fcc by subsequent deposition of Pt. The transformation is thermodynamically favorable because the intermixed fcc phase has lower epitaxial mismatch and bulk chemical free energy than the bcc phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schmailzl, P., Schmidt, K., Bayer, P., Döll, R., and Heinz, K., Surface Science 312, 73 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Daniels, B.J., Nix, W.D., and Clemens, B.M., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 356, 373 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Sakurai, M., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7272 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Clemens, B.M., Hufnagel, T.C., Kautzky, M.C., and Bobo, J.-F., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., Spring 1996 MRS Meeting, 1996 (in press).Google Scholar
5. Payne, A.P., Clemens, B.M., and Brennan, S., Rev. Sci. Instr. 63, 1147 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Fullerton, E.E., Schuller, I.K., Vanderstraeten, H., and Bruynseraede, Y., Phys. Rev. B 45, 9292 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Clemens, B.M. and Gay, J.G., Phys. Rev. B 35, 9337 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Payne, A.P., Lairson, B.M., Brennan, S., Daniels, B.J., Rensing, N.M., and Clemens, B.M., Phys. Rev. B 47, 16064 (1993).Google Scholar