Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:03:53.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size Effect on Crack Formation in Cu/Ta and Ta/Cu/Ta Thin Film Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

P. Gruber ,
J. Böhm ,
A. Wanner ,
L. Sauter ,
R. Spolenak  and
E. Arzt
P. Gruber
Affiliation:
Universitét Stuttgart, Institut für Metallkunde, Stuttgart, Germany
J. Böhm
Affiliation:
Universitét Stuttgart, Institut für Metallkunde, Stuttgart, Germany
A. Wanner
Affiliation:
Universitét Karlsruhe, Institut für Werkstoffkunde I, Karlsruhe, Germany
L. Sauter
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Stuttgart, Germany
R. Spolenak
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Stuttgart, Germany
E. Arzt
Affiliation:
Universitét Stuttgart, Institut für Metallkunde, Stuttgart, Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Layered structures of Cu and Ta thin films on silicon are well established for many technological applications in microelectronics. Electronic circuits used for flexible displays or wearable electronics are becoming increasingly popular. For such applications, the Cu/Ta system must be transferred to flexible substrates, incorporating a design rule for several percent of total strain. We have investigated the deformation behaviour of different Cu/Ta and Ta/Cu/Ta thin film systems on a flexible polyimide substrate subjected to total strains of more than 5%. A novel synchrotron X-ray diffraction technique allowed us to characterize the evolution of mechanical stress in very thin metallic films during isothermal tensile tests. We found that samples with a Cu film thickness below 300 nm showed a sudden stress decrease at a total strain of about 2.5%. This stress drop was attributed to fracture of the entire film system, initiated by cracks in the Ta layers.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 821: Symposium P – Nanoscale Materials & Modeling-Relations Among Processing, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties , 2004 , P2.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nix, W.D., Metall. Trans. A 20A, 2217–45 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Arzt, E., Acta Mater. 46, 5611–26 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Venkatraman, R. and Bravman, J.C., J. Mater. Res. 7 (8), 2040–48 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Vinci, R.P., Zielinski, E.M. and Bravman, J.C., Thin Solid Films 262, 142–53 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Shen, Y.L., Suresh, S., He, M.Y., Bagchi, A., Kienzle, O., Rühle, M. and Evans, A.G., J. Mater. Res. 13 (7), 1928-37 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Balk, T.J., Dehm, G. and Arzt, E., Acta Mater. 51, 4471–85 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Holloway, K. and Fryer, P.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (17), 1736–38 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Rogers, J.A., Bao, Z., Baldwin, K., Dodabalapur, A., Crone, B., Raju, V.R., Kuck, V., Katz, H., Amundson, K., Ewing, J. and Drzaic, P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (9), 4835–40 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Post, E.R., Orth, M., Russo, P.R. and Gershenfeld, N., IBM Syst. J. 39, 840–60 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Böhm, J., Gruber, P., Spolenak, R., Stierle, A., Wanner, A. and Arzt, E., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 (4), 1110–19 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Böhm, J., Gruber, P., Spolenak, R., Wanner, A. and Arzt, E., these proceedings, P1.6.Google Scholar
12. Feinstein, L.G. and Huttemann, R.D., Thin Solid Films 16, 129–45 (1973).Google Scholar
13. , Gruber et al. , work in progress.Google Scholar
14. Beuth, J.L., Int. J. Solids Structures 29, 1657–75 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Xia, Z.C. and Hutchinson, J.W., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48, 1107–31 (2000).Google Scholar