Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-rnj55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T04:38:20.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Si-Induced AlGaAs/GaAs Superlaitce Disordering Using a Grown-In Impurity Source and the Effects of Annealing Ambient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

B.L. Olmsted
Affiliation:
The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
S.N. Houde-Walter
Affiliation:
The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
Get access

Abstract

We report on a study of the role of defect diffusion from the crystal surface in the disordering of a multiple quantum well structure that was Si-doped during MBE growth. The distribution of native defects was inferred from correlating the results of photoluminescence spectroscopy, secondary ion mass spectrometry, and electrochemical C-V profiling. No significant change was observed between the Al-Ga interdiffusion coefficients of Si-doped and undoped superlattices when annealed with excess Ga. This is attributed to the lack of a source of group III vacancies. Furthermore, only a small fraction of the enhancement predicted for the Si doping was observed when excess As was used instead. The largest Fermi-level enhancement was observed when no excess Ga or As was included in the evacuated ampoule. The results indicate that the crystal surface was the source and sink of the native defects known to mediate the Al-Ga interdiffusion. Furthermore, significant electrical compensation of the donors was observed after both As- and Ga-rich anneals. This is attributed to ionized group III vacancy generation in the former case, and Si atoms moving from group In to V sites in the later.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Deppe, D. G. and Holonyak, N. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 64, R93 (1988), and references therein.Google Scholar
2. Zou, W. X., Law, K.-K., Grossard, A. C., Hu, E. L., Coldren, L. A., and Merz, J. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2534 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Thornton, R. L., Mosby, W. J., Donaldson, R. M., and Paoli, T. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1623 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Thornton, R. L., Mosby, W. J., and Paoli, T. L., J. Lightwave Technol. 6, 786 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Pavesi, L., Ky, N. H., Ganidre, J. D., Reinhart, F. K., Baba-Ali, N., Harrison, I., Tuck, B., and Henini, M., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 2225 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Deppe, D. G., Holonyak, N. Jr., and Hsieh, K. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 581 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Olmsted, B. L. and Houde-Walter, S. N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 368 (1992), and references therein.Google Scholar
8. Mei, P., Venkatesan, T., Schwarz, S. A., Stoffel, N. G., Harbison, J. P., and Florez, L. A., in Epitaxy of Semiconductor Layered Structures, edited by Tung, R. T., Dawson, L. R., and Gunshor, R. L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 102, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988), pp. 161164.Google Scholar
9. Mei, P., Yoon, H. W., Venkatesan, T., Schwarz, S. A., and Harbison, J. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1823 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Deppe, D. G., Holonyak, N. Jr., Piano, W. E., Robbins, V. M., Dallesasse, J. M., Hsieh, K. C., and Baker, J. E., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1838 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Gao, Y., in Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry SIMS VII, edited by Benninghoven, A., Evans, C. A., McKeegan, K. D., Storms, H. A., and Werner, H. W. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1990), pp. 155158.Google Scholar
12. Magee, C. W., Harrington, W. L., and Botnick, E. M., Int. J. Mass Spectrometry Ion Processes 103, 45 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Olmsted, B. L., Houde-Walter, S. N., and Viturro, R. E., in Materials Research Society Meeting. Advanced III-V Compound Semiconductor Growth. Processing and Devices, edited by Pearton, S. J., Sadana, D. K., and Zavada, J. M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 240, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991), pp. 721726.Google Scholar
14. The results have been recalculated using the revised parameters 134 Å GaAs/126 Å Al0.58Ga0.42As that were determined using double-crystal x-ray diffractometry.Google Scholar
15. Tan, T. Y. and Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1240 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Sze, S. M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981), p. 19.Google Scholar